Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on current management and recent research for amblyopia treatment. Part I will review patching, atropine penalization, and pharmacological treatments. Part II will focus on perceptual learning, video gaming, and binocular dichoptic approaches.

Methods

A literature search was performed in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and reference lists of retrieved articles until December 20, 2018, for all papers containing “amblyopia treatment” or “amblyopia therapy.” We have included RCTs, prospective observational studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, pilot studies, and review articles.

Results

The mainstay of treatment for amblyopia has been based on increasing visual stimulation of the amblyopic eye by occlusion, atropine, or optical penalization of the dominant eye. It has been established that refractive adaptation alone can significantly enhance visual acuity. However, the duration of optical correction varies between studies and the effectiveness of spectacle wear over early beginning of patching is still under investigation. Additionally, by means of occlusion dose monitors, it was found that adherence to occlusion affects the outcome, as a dose-response relationship exists between adherence and visual acuity. Treatment efficiency declines with age; however, recent evidence indicates cortical plasticity beyond the “critical period” and recommends that an attempt at treatment should be offered to all amblyopic children regardless of age, including those in later childhood. Novel approaches targeted to the restoration of binocular functions, such as perceptual learning, video gaming, and dichoptic training, have shown small effects on visual acuity and have failed to demonstrate non-inferiority over standard treatments.

Conclusions

On review, significant evidence for the successful management of amblyopia, with occlusion therapy and atropine, has been found. However, the management of amblyopia remains challenging, mainly due to compliance issues and suboptimal treatment outcomes during occlusion and atropine penalization. Recent studies have found evidence of new ways of treating amblyopia particularly in regard to binocular treatment although these remain under investigation. Further robust clinical trials on these new treatment modalities are still warranted in order to establish their role in treating amblyopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W, Jolly N, Sparkes R (1998) Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 105:154–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hakim RB, Tielsch JM (1992) Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy. A risk factor for childhood strabismus. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1459–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chew E, Remaley NA, Tamboli A, Zhao J, Podgor MJ, Klebanoff M (1994) Risk factors for esotropia and exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 112:1349–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D (2002) Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. Lancet 360:597–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams C (2009) Amblyopia. BMJ Clin Evid 2009:0709

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1970) The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol Lond 206:419–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. von Noorden GK, Crawford ML (1979) The sensitive period. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 99:442–446

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holmes JM, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Astle WF, Birch EE, Cole SR, Cotter SA, Donahue S, Everett DF et al (2004) Risk of amblyopia recurrence after cessation of treatment. J AAPOS 8:420–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park KH, Hwang JM, Ahn JK (2004) Efficacy of amblyopia therapy initiated after 9 years of age. Eye 18:571–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Snowdon SK, Stewart-Brown SL (1997) Preschool vision screening. Health Technol Assess 1:1–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bloch D, Wick B (1991) Differences between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia: research findings and impact on management. Problems Optom 3:276–292

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor K, Elliott S (2014) Interventions for strabismic amblyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD006461

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cotter SA, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Edwards AR, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, Birch EE, Donahue SP et al (2006) Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction. Ophthalmology 113:895–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Cooperative MOTAS (2004a) Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1552–1556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Writing Committee for the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Cotter SA, Foster NC, Holmes JM, Melia BM, Wallace DK, Repka MX, Tamkins SM, Kraker RT, Beck RW et al (2012) Optical treatment of strabismic and combined strabismic anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 119:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen PL, Chen JT, Tai MC, Fu JJ, Chang CC, Lu DW (2007) Anisometropic amblyopia treated with spectacle correction alone: possible factors predicting success and time to start patching. Am J Ophthalmol 143:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asper L, Watt K, Khuu S (2018) Optical treatment of amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Optom 101:431–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao TY, Anstice N, Babu RJ, Black JM, Bobier WR, Dai S et al (2018a) Optical treatment of amblyopia in older children and adults is essential prior to enrolment in a clinical trial. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 38:129–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW, Edwards AR, Birch E, Cotter SA, Crouch ER Jr, Cruz OA, Davitt BV et al (2005) Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol 123:437–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallace DK, Chandler DL, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Bacal DA, Birch EE, Felius J, Frazier M, Holmes JM et al (2007) Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Am J Ophthalmol 144:487–496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarke MP, Wright CM, Hrisos S, Anderson JD, Henderson J, Richardson SR (2003) Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening. BMJ 327:1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moseley MJ, Neufeld M, McCarry B, Charnock A, McNamara R, Rice T, Fielder A (2002) Remediation of refractive amblyopia by optical correction alone. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 22:296–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR (2004b) Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3048–3054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maconachie G, Farooq S, Bush G, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I (2012) Effect of compliance to glasses wear on the outcome of visual acuity after refractive adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:5609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Norris JH, Pilling RF, Hook J (2009) An audit of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists strabismic amblyopia treatment protocol: a departmental review. Strabismus 17:78–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Qurrah TI (1991) Vision and perception. Obiekan Publishing House, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tan JH, Thompson JR, Gottlob I (2003) Differences in the management of amblyopia between European countries. Br J Ophthalmol 87:291–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Repka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cotter SA, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Moke PS et al (2003) A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 121:603–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Repka MX et al (2003) A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 110:2075–2087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Awan M, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I (2005) A randomized controlled trial of unilateral strabismic and mixed amblyopia using occlusion dose monitors to record compliance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:1435–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart CE, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Moseley MJ, Cooperative MOTAS (2007a) Modeling dose-response in amblyopia: toward a child-specific treatment plan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2589–2594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stewart CE, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Moseley MJ, ROTAS Cooperative (2007b) Objectively monitored patching regimens for treatment of amblyopia: randomised trial. BMJ 335:707

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wallace MP, Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Monitored Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study (MOTAS) Cooperatives; Randomized Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study (ROTAS) Cooperatives (2013) Compliance with occlusion therapy for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:6158–6166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dixon-Woods M, Awan M, Gottlob I (2006) Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study. Arch Dis Child 91:491–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Parkes LC (2001) An investigation of the impact of occlusion therapy on children with amblyopia, its effect on their families, and compliance with treatment. Br Orthopt J 58:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oliver M, Neumann MD, Chaimovitch Y, Gotesman N, Shimshoni M (1986) Compliance and results of treatment for amblyopia in children more than 8 years old. Am J Ophthalmol 102:340–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nucci P, Alfarano R, Piantanida A, Brancato R (1992) Compliance in anti-amblyopia occlusion therapy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 70:128–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith LK, Thompson JR, Woodruff G, Hiscox F (1995) Factors affecting treatment compliance in amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 32:98–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hudak D, Magoon E (1997) Poverty predicts amblyopia treatment failure. J AAPOS 4:214–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Newsham D (2000) Parental non-concordance with occlusion therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 84:957–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Loudon SE, Fronius M, Looman CW, Awan M, Simonsz B, van der Maas PJ, Simonsz HJ (2006) Predictors and a remedy for noncompliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the occlusion dose monitor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4393–4400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tjiam AM, Akcan H, Ziylan F, Vukovic E, Loudon SE, Looman CW, Passchier J, Simonsz HJ (2011) Sociocultural and psychological determinants in migrants for noncompliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1893–1899

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Newsham D (2002) A randomised controlled trial of written information: the effect on parental non-concordance with occlusion therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 86:787–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Searle A, Norman P, Harrad R, Vedhara K (2002) Psychosocial and clinical determinants of compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopic children. Eye 16:150–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tjiam AM, Holtslag G, Vukovic E, Asjes-Tydeman WL, Loudon SE, Borsboom GJ, de Koning HJ, Simonsz HJ (2012) An educational cartoon accelerates amblyopia therapy and improves compliance, especially among children of immigrants. Ophthalmology 119:2393–2401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tjiam AM, Holtslag G, Van Minderhout HM, Simonsz-Toth B, Vermeulen-Jong MH, Borsboom GJ, Loudon SE, Simonsz HJ (2013) Randomised comparison of three tools for improving compliance with occlusion therapy: an educational cartoon story, a reward calendar, and an information leaflet for parents. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:321–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pradeep A, Proudlock FA, Awan M, Bush G, Collier J, Gottlob I (2014) An educational intervention to improve adherence to high-dosage patching regimen for amblyopia: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 98:865–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Holmes JM, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Johnson DA, Klimek DL, Kraker RT, Lee KA, Lyon DW et al (2005) A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia. J AAPOS 9:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2008) A randomized trial of near versus distance activities while patching for amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7 years. Ophthalmology 115:2071–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Alotaibi AG, Fawazi SM, Alenazy BR, Abu-Amero KK (2012) Outcomes of 3 hours part-time occlusion treatment combined with near activities among children with unilateral amblyopia. Saudi Med J 33:395–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Epelbaum M, Milleret C, Buisseret P, Dufier JL (1993) The sensitive period for strabismic amblyopia in humans. Ophthalmology 100:323–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fronius M, Cirina L, Ackermann H, Kohnen T, Diehl CM (2014) Efficiency of electronically monitored amblyopia treatment between 5 and 16 years of age: new insight into declining susceptibility of the visual system. Vis Res 103:11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2004) A prospective, pilot study of treatment of amblyopia in children 10 to <18 years old. Am J Ophthalmol 137:581–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mintz-Hittner HA, Fernandez KM (2000) Successful amblyopia therapy initiated after age 7 years: compliance cures. Arch Ophthalmol 118:1535–1541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mohan K, Saroha V, Sharma A (2004) Successful occlusion therapy for amblyopia in 11- to 15-year-old children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 41:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Klaeger-Manzanell C, Hoyt CS, Good WV (1994) Two step recovery of vision in the amblyopic eye after visual loss and enucleation of the fixing eye. Br J Ophthalmol 78:506–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. American Academy of Ophthalmology Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel (2012) Preferred practice pattern® guidelines. Amblyopia. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology. Available from: http://www.aao.org/ppp. Accessed 5 Aug 2018

  58. Bhola R, Keech RV, Kutschke P, Pfeifer W, Scott WE (2006) Recurrence of amblyopia after occlusion therapy. Ophthalmology 113:2097–2100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nilsson J, Baumann M, Sjöstrand J (2007) Strabismus might be a risk factor for amblyopia recurrence. J AAPOS 11:240–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Walsh LA, Hahn EK, LaRoche GR (2009) The method of treatment cessation and recurrence rate of amblyopia. Strabismus 17:107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Foley-Nolan A, McCann A, O'Keefe M (1997) Atropine penalisation versus occlusion as the primary treatment for amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 81:54–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2002) A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 120:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Repka MX, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Donahue S, Everett DF, Hertle RW et al (2005) Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 123:149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Repka MX, Cotter SA, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Birch EE, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Holmes JM, Quinn GE et al (2004) A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 111:2076–2085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Felius J, Holmes JM, Kundart J, Morrison DG et al (2008) Patching vs atropine to treat amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years: a randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 126:1634–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch E, Cotter SA, Holmes JM, Hertle RW, Hoover DL, Klimek DL et al (2009) Treatment of severe amblyopia with weekend atropine: results from 2 randomized clinical trials. J AAPOS 13:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2003) The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study. Am J Ophthalmol 136:630–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Menon V, Shailesh G, Sharma P, Saxena R (2008) Clinical trial of patching versus atropine penalization for the treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in older children. J AAPOS 12:493–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Felius J, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Chu RH, Cole SR, Hill M, Huang K, Kulp MT, Lazar EL et al (2010) Evaluating the burden of amblyopia treatment from the parent and child’s perspective. J AAPOS 14:389–395

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Repka MX, Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Hoover DL, Weise KK, Waters AL, Rice ML, Peters RJ (2015) A randomized trial of adding a plano lens to atropine for amblyopia. J AAPOS 19:42–48

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2009) Pharmacological plus optical penalization treatment for amblyopia: results of a randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 127:22–30

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Repka MX, Ray JM (1993) The efficacy of optical and pharmacological penalization. Ophthalmology 100:769–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Simons K, Stein L, Sener EC, Vitale S, Guyton DL (1997) Full-time atropine, intermittent atropine, and optical penalization and binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 104:2143–2155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kaye SB, Chen SI, Price G, Kaye LC, Noonan C, Tripathi A, Ashwin P, Cota N, Clark D, Butcher J (2002) Combined optical and atropine penalization for the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS 6:289–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Tejedor J, Ogallar C (2008) Comparative efficacy of penalization methods in moderate to mild amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 145:562–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Laria C, Piñero DP, Alió JL (2011) Characterization of Bangerter filter effect in mild and moderate anisometropic amblyopia: predictive factors for the visual outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:759–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Agervi P, Kugelberg U, Kugelberg M, Simonsson G, Fornander M, Zetterström C (2009) Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles or in combination with translucent Bangerter filters. Ophthalmology 116:1475–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing Committee, Rutstein RP, Quinn GE, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Bonsall DJ, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Holmes JM, Hoover DL et al (2010) A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 117:998–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Laria C, Pinero DP (2012) Characterization of Bangerter filter effect in mild and moderate amblyopia associated with strabismus. Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano 27:174–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Iacobucci I, Archer S, Furr B, Martonyi EJ, Del Monte MA (2001) Bangerter foils in the treatment of moderate amblyopia. Am Orthopt J 51:84–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Agervi P (2011) Treatment with Bangerter filters. J AAPOS 15:121–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Repka MX, Gramatikov BI (2006) The reproducibility of blur with a Bangerter filter. J AAPOS 10:80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Rutstein RP, Foster NC, Cotter SA, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2011) Visual acuity through Bangerter filters in nonamblyopic eyes. J AAPOS 15:131–134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Iuvone PM, Tigges M, Fernandes A, Tigges J (1989) Dopamine synthesis and metabolism in rhesus monkey retina: development, aging, and the effects of monocular visual deprivation. Vis Neurosci 2:465–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Gottlob I, Stangler-Zuschrott E (1990) Effect of levodopa on contrast sensitivity and scotomas in human amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:776–780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Gottlob I, Charlier J, Reinecke RD (1992) Visual acuities and scotomas after one week levodopa administration in human amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:2722–2728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Gottlob I, Wizov SS, Reinecke RD (1995) Visual acuities and scotomas after 3 weeks’ levodopa administration in adult amblyopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:407–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Leguire LE, Rogers GL, Bremer DL, Walson PD, McGregor ML (1993a) Levodopa/carbidopa for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:3090–3095

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Leguire LE, Walson PD, Rogers GL, Bremer DL, McGregor ML (1993b) Longitudinal study of levodopa/carbidopa for childhood amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 30:354–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Leguire LE, Walson PD, Rogers GL, Bremer DL, McGregor ML (1995) Levodopa/carbidopa treatment for amblyopia in older children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 32:143–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Leguire LE, Rogers GL, Walson PD, Bremer DL, McGregor ML (1998) Occlusion and levodopa-carbidopa treatment for childhood amblyopia. JAAPOS 2:257–264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Dadeya S, Vats P, Malik KP (2009) Levodopa/carbidopa in the treatment of amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 46:87–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Yang CI, Yang ML, Huang JC, Wan YL, Jui-Fang Tsai R, Wai YY, Liu HL (2003) Functional MRI of amblyopia before and after levodopa. Neurosci Lett 339:49–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Mohan K, Dhankar V, Sharma A (2001) Visual acuities after levodopa administration in amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 38:62–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Atkinson CS, Bacal DA, Bremer DL, Davis PL, Gearinger MD, Glaser SR et al (2010) Pilot study of levodopa dose as treatment for residual amblyopia in children aged 8 years to younger than 18 years. Arch Ophthalmol 128:1215–1217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Bhartiya P, Sharma P, Biswas NR, Tandon R, Khokhar SK (2002) Levodopa-carbidopa with occlusion in older children with amblyopia. J AAPOS 6:368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Repka MX, Kraker RT, Dean TW, Beck RW, Siatkowski RM, Holmes JM, Beauchamp CL, Golden RP, Miller AM et al (2015) A randomized trial of levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in older children. Ophthalmology 122:874–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Razeghinejad MR, Nowroozzadeh MH, Eghbal MH (2016) Levodopa and other pharmacologic interventions in ischemic and traumatic optic neuropathies and amblyopia. Clin Neuropharmacol 39:40–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Secades JJ, Lorenzo JL (2006) Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review, 2006 update. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 28(Suppl B):1–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Secades JJ, Frontera G (1995) CDP-choline: pharmacological and clinical review. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 17(Suppl B):1–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Campos EC, Schiavi C, Benedetti P, Bolzani R, Porciatti V (1995) Effect of citicoline on visual acuity in amblyopia: preliminary results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:307–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Parisi V, Manni G, Colacino G, Bucci MG (1999) Cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine (citicoline) improves retinal and cortical responses in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 106:1126–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Rejdak R, Toczołowski J, Solski J, Duma D, Grieb P (2002) Citicoline treatment increases retinal dopamine content in rabbits. Ophthalmic Res 34:146–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Porciatti V, Schiavi C, Benedetti P, Baldi A, Campos EC (1998) Cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine improves visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and visually-evoked potentials of amblyopic subjects. Curr Eye Res 17:141–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Campos EC, Bolzani R, Schiavi C, Baldi A, Porciatti V (1996) Cytidin-5′-diphosphocholine enhances the effect of part-time occlusion in amblyopia. Doc Ophthalmol 93:247–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Pawar PV, Mumbare SS, Patil MS, Ramakrishnan S (2014) Effectiveness of the addition of citicoline to patching in the treatment of amblyopia around visual maturity: a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Ophthalmol 62:124–129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Sabetti L, Masedu F, Tresca C, Bianchi F, Valenti M (2017) The use of choline in association with the Bangerter filters for the treatment of amblyopia. Int J Ophthalmol 10:1777–1778

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Fresina M, Dickmann A, Salerni A, De Gregorio F, Campos EC (2008) Effect of oral CDP-choline on visual function in young amblyopic patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:143–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. BenEzra O, Herzog R, Cohen E, Karshai I, BenEzra D (2007) Liquid crystal glasses: feasibility and safety of a new modality for treating amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 125:580–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Spierer A, Raz J, Benezra O, Herzog R, Cohen E, Karshai I, Benezra D (2010) Treating amblyopia with liquid crystal glasses: a pilot study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3395–3398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Erbağcı I, Okumuş S, Öner V, Coşkun E, Çelik O, Ören B (2015) Using liquid crystal glasses to treat ambyopia in children. J AAPOS 19:257–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Wang J, Neely DE, Galli J, Schliesser J, Graves A, Damarjian TG, Kovarik J, Bowsher J, Smith HA et al (2016) A pilot randomized clinical trial of intermittent occlusion therapy liquid crystal glasses versus traditional patching for treatment of moderate unilateral amblyopia. J AAPOS 20:326–331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Gibson EJ (1963) Perceptual learning. Annu Rev Psychol 14:29–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Campbell FW, Hess RF, Watson PG, Banks R (1978) Preliminary results of a physiologically based treatment of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 62:748–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Willshaw HE, Malmheden A, Clarke J, Williams A, Dean L (1980) Experience with the CAM vision stimulator: preliminary report. Br J Ophthalmol 64:339–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Tytla ME, Labow-Daily LS (1981) Evaluation of the CAM treatment for amblyopia: a controlled study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20:400–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Nyman KG, Singh G, Rydberg A, Fornander M (1983) Controlled study comparing CAM treatment with occlusion therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 67:178–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Levi DM, Li RW (2009a) Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: a mini-review. Vis Res 49:2535–2549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Levi DM, Li RW (2009b) Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 364:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Levi DM, Polat U, Hu YS (1997) Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia. Practice makes better. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:1493–1510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Huang CB, Zhou Y, Lu ZL (2008) Broad bandwidth of perceptual learning in the visual system of adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4068–4073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D (2004) Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:6692–6697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Li RW, Young KG, Hoenig P, Levi DM (2005) Perceptual learning improves visual performance in juvenile amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3161–3168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Li RW, Provost A, Levi DM (2007) Extended perceptual learning results in substantial recovery of positional acuity and visual acuity in juvenile amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5046–5051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Spierer A (2009) Treatment of children with amblyopia by perceptual learning. Vis Res 49:2599–2603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Chung ST, Li RW, Levi DM (2006) Identification of contrast-defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia. Vis Res 46:3853–3861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Zhou Y, Huang C, Xu P, Tao L, Qiu Z, Li X, Lu ZL (2006) Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Vis Res 46:739–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Li RW, Klein SA, Levi DM (2008) Prolonged perceptual learning of positional acuity in adult amblyopia: perceptual template retuning dynamics. J Neurosci 28:14223–14229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Huang CB, Lu ZL, Zhou Y (2009) Mechanisms underlying perceptual learning of contrast detection in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. J Vis 9:1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Astle AT, Webb BS, McGraw PV (2011) The pattern of learned visual improvements in adult amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7195–7204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Ding J, Levi DM (2011) Recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning in human adults with abnormal binocular vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:733–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Hou F, Huang CB, Tao L, Feng L, Zhou Y, Lu ZL (2011) Training in contrast detection improves motion perception of sinewave gratings in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:6501–6510

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Chung ST, Li RW, Levi DM (2012) Learning to identify near-acuity letters, either with or without flankers, results in improved letter size and spacing limits in adults with amblyopia. PLoS One 7:35829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Hussain Z, Webb BS, Astle AT, McGraw PV (2012) Perceptual learning reduces crowding in amblyopia and in the normal periphery. J Neurosci 32:474–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Xi J, Jia WL, Feng LX, Lu ZL, Huang CB (2014) Perceptual learning improves stereoacuity in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:2384–2391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Zhang JY, Cong LJ, Klein SA, Levi DM, Yu C (2014) Perceptual learning improves adult amblyopic vision through rule-based cognitive compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:2020–2030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Vagge A, Nelson LB (2016) Amblyopia update: new treatments. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27:380–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Chen Z, Li J, Liu J, Cai X, Yuan J, Deng D, Yu M (2016) Monocular perceptual learning of contrast detection facilitates binocular combination in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Sci Rep 6:20187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Jia W, Lan F, Zhao X, Lu ZL, Huang CB, Zhao W, Li M (2017) The effects of monocular training on binocular functions in anisometropic amblyopia. Vis Res S0042-6989(17):30099–30098

    Google Scholar 

  140. Ooi TL, Su YR, Natale DM, He ZJ (2013) A push-pull treatment for strengthening the ‘lazy eye’ in amblyopia. Curr Biol 23:309–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Zhai J, Chen M, Liu L, Zhao X, Zhang H, Luo X, Gao J (2013) Perceptual learning treatment in patients with anisometropic amblyopia: a neuroimaging study. Br J Ophthalmol 97:1420–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Buckley D, Codina C, Bhardwaj P, Pascalis O (2010) Action video game players and deaf observers have larger Goldmann visual fields. Vis Res 50:548–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Li R, Polat U, Makous W, Bavelier D (2009) Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training. Nat Neurosci 12:549–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Green CS, Bavelier D (2007) Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychol Sci 18:88–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Green CS, Bavelier D (2003) Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature 423:534–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Foss AJ (2017) Use of video games for the treatment of amblyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 28:276–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Li RW, Ngo C, Nguyen J, Levi DM (2011) Video-game play induces plasticity in the visual system of adults with amblyopia. PLoS Biol 9:1001135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Jeon ST, Maurer D, Lewis TL (2012) The effect of video game training on the vision of adults with bilateral deprivation amblyopia. Seeing Perceiving 25:493–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Hussain Z, Astle AT, Webb BS, McGraw PV (2014) The challenges of developing a contrast-based video game for treatment of amblyopia. Front Psychol 5:1210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Li J, Thompson B, Deng D, Chan LY, Yu M, Hess RF (2013) Dichoptic training enables the adult amblyopic brain to learn. Curr Biol 23:308–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Hess RF, Thompson B (2013) New insights into amblyopia: binocular therapy and noninvasive brain stimulation. J AAPOS 17:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B (2010) A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. Restor Neurol Neurosci 28:793–802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Vedamurthy I, Knill DC, Huang SJ, Yung A, Ding J, Kwon OS, Bavelier D, Levi DM (2016) Recovering stereo vision by squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 371:20150264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Hess RF, Thompson B (2015) Amblyopia and the binocular approach to its therapy. Vis Res 114:4–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Vedamurthy I, Nahum M, Bavelier D, Levi DM (2015a) Mechanisms of recovery of visual function in adult amblyopia through a tailored action video game. Sci Rep 5:8482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Vedamurthy I, Nahum M, Huang SJ, Zheng F, Bayliss J, Bavelier D, Levi DM (2015b) A dichoptic custom-made action video game as a treatment for adult amblyopia. Vis Res 114:173–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Bossi M, Tailor VK, Anderson EJ, Bex PJ, Greenwood JA, Dahlmann-Noor A, Dakin SC (2017) Binocular therapy for childhood amblyopia improves vision without breaking interocular suppression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:3031–3043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Kelly KR, Jost RM, Wang YZ, Dao L, Beauchamp CL, Leffler JN, Birch EE (2018) Improved binocular outcomes following binocular treatment for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:1221–1228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Knox PJ, Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Cleary M (2012) An exploratory study: prolonged periods of binocular stimulation can provide an effective treatment for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:817–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Guo CX, Babu RJ, Black JM, Bobier WR, Lam CS, Dai S, Gao TY, Hess RF, Jenkins M et al (2016) Binocular treatment of amblyopia using videogames (BRAVO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 17:504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Li SL, Jost RM, Morale SE, Stager DR, Dao L, Stager D, Birch EE (2014) A binocular iPad treatment for amblyopic children. Eye 28:1246–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Li SL, Jost RM, Morale SE, De La Cruz A, Dao L, Stager D Jr, Birch EE (2015) Binocular iPad treatment of amblyopia for lasting improvement of visual acuity. JAMA Ophthalmol 133:479–480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Birch EE, Li SL, Jost RM, Morale SE, De La Cruz A, Stager D Jr, Dao L, Stager DR Sr (2015) Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool children. JAAPOS 19:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  164. Gambacorta C, Nahum M, Vedamurthy I, Bayliss J, Jordan J, Bavelier D, Levi DM (2018) An action video game for the treatment of amblyopia in children: a feasibility study. Vis Res 148:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Foss AJ, Gregson RM, MacKeith D, Herbison N, Ash IM, Cobb SV, Eastgate RM, Hepburn T, Vivian A et al (2013) Evaluation and development of a novel binocular treatment (I-BiT™) system using video clips and interactive games to improve vision in children with amblyopia (‘lazy eye’): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 14:145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Waddingham PE, Butler TK, Cobb SV, Moody AD, Comaish IF, Haworth SM, Gregson RM, Ash IM, Brown SM et al (2006) Preliminary results from the use of the novel Interactive binocular treatment (I-BiT) system, in the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Eye 20:375–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Cleary M, Moody AD, Buchanan A, Stewart H, Dutton GN (2009) Assessment of a computer-based treatment for older amblyopes: the Glasgow Pilot Study. Eye 23:124–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Herbison N, Cobb S, Gregson R, Ash I, Eastgate R, Purdy J, Hepburn T, MacKeith D, Foss A, I-BiT study group (2013) Interactive binocular treatment (I-BiT) for amblyopia: results of a pilot study of 3D shutter glasses system. Eye 27:1077–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Herbison N, MacKeith D, Vivian A, Purdy J, Fakis A, Ash IM, Cobb SV, Eastgate RM, Haworth SM et al (2016) Randomised controlled trial of video clips and interactive games to improve vision in children with amblyopia using the I-BiT system. Br J Ophthalmol 100:1511–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Holmes JM, Manh VM, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Birch EE, Kraker RT, Crouch ER, Erzurum SA, Khuddus N et al (2016) Effect of a binocular iPad game vs part-time patching in children aged 5 to 12 years with amblyopia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 134:1391–1400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Kelly KR, Jost RM, Dao L, Beauchamp CL, Leffler JN, Birch EE (2016) Binocular iPad game vs patching for treatment of amblyopia in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 134:1402–1408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Manh VM, Holmes JM, Lazar EL, Kraker RT, Wallace DK, Kulp MT et al (2018) A randomized trial of a binocular iPad game versus part-time patching in children aged 13 to 16 years with amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 186:104–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Gao TY, Guo CX, Babu RJ, Black JM, Bobier WR, Chakraborty A et al (2018b) Effectiveness of a binocular video game vs placebo video game for improving visual functions in older children, teenagers, and adults with amblyopia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:172–181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Holmes JM, Manny RE, Lazar EL, Birch EE, Kelly KR, Summers AI et al (2018) A randomized trial of binocular Dig Rush game treatment for amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years of age. Ophthalmology S0161-6420:32304–32302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Li SL, Reynaud A, Hess RF, Wang YZ, Jost RM, Morale SE, De La Cruz A, Dao L, Stager D Jr et al (2015) Dichoptic movie viewing treats childhood amblyopia. J AAPOS 19:401–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Tsirlin I, Colpa L, Goltz HC, Wong AM (2015) Behavioral training as new treatment for adult amblyopia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:4061–4075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Holmes JM (2018) Lessons from recent randomized clinical trials of binocular treatment for amblyopia. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:181–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527:633–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Thompson B, Mansouri B, Koski L, Hess RF (2008) Brain plasticity in the adult: modulation of function in amblyopia with rTMS. Curr Biol 18:1067–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Clavagnier S, Thompson B, Hess RF (2013) Long lasting effects of daily theta burst rTMS sessions in the human amblyopic cortex. Brain Stimul 6:860–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Spiegel DP, Byblow WD, Hess RF, Thompson B (2013) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation transiently improves contrast sensitivity and normalizes visual cortex activation in individuals with amblyopia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27:760–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Ding Z, Li J, Spiegel DP, Chen Z, Chan L, Luo G, Yuan J, Deng D, Yu M, Thompson B (2016) The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity and visual evoked potential amplitude in adults with amblyopia. Sci Rep 6:19280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Siedentopf CM, Golaszewski SM, Mottaghy FM, Ruff CC, Felber S, Schlager A (2002) Functional magnetic resonance imaging detects activation of the visual association cortex during laser acupuncture of the foot in humans. Neurosci Lett 327:53–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Zhao J, Lam DS, Chen LJ, Wang Y, Zheng C, Lin Q, Rao SK, Fan DS, Zhang M et al (2010) Randomized controlled trial of patching vs acupuncture for anisometropic amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years. Arch Ophthalmol 128:1510–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Lam DS, Zhao J, Chen LJ, Wang Y, Zheng C, Lin Q, Rao SK, Fan DS, Zhang M et al (2011) Adjunctive effect of acupuncture to refractive correction on anisometropic amblyopia: one-year results of a randomized crossover trial. Ophthalmology 118:1501–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Wallace DK (2011) Acupuncture for amblyopia: study design considerations. Arch Ophthalmol 129:1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Repka MX (2011) Acupuncture for anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS 15:3–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Maconachie GD, Gottlob I (2015) The challenges of amblyopia treatment. Biom J 38:510–516

    Google Scholar 

  189. Paysse EA, Tychsen L, Stahl E (2012) Pediatric refractive surgery: corneal and intraocular techniques and beyond. J AAPOS 16:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Stahl ED (2017) Pediatric refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 28:305–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Alió JL, Wolter NV, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Sari ES, Cankaya C, Laria C (2011) Pediatric refractive surgery and its role in the treatment of amblyopia: meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature. J Refract Surg 27:364–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Pirouzian A, Ip KC (2010) Anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in children to treat severe anisometropic myopia and amblyopia: 3-year clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1486–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Shi M, Jiang H, Niu X, Dai H, Ye Y (2014) Hyperopic corneal refractive surgery in patients with accommodative esotropia and amblyopia. J AAPOS 18:316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Emara KE, Al Abdulsalam O, Al Habash A (2015) Implantation of spherical and toric copolymer phackic intraocular lens to manage amblyopia due to anisometropic hyperopia and myopia in pediatric patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2458–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Eissa SA (2017) Management of pseudophakic myopic anisometropic amblyopia with piggyback Visian® implantable collamer lens. Acta Ophthalmol 95:188–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Tailor V, Bossi M, Greenwood JA, Dahlmann-Noor A (2016) Childhood amblyopia: current management and new trends. Br Med Bull 119:75–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo Area, 41110, Larissa, Greece

    Eleni Papageorgiou & Evangelia E. Tsironi

  2. Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Eleni Papageorgiou, Gail Maconachie & Irene Gottlob

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

    Ioannis Asproudis

Authors
  1. Eleni Papageorgiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ioannis Asproudis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gail Maconachie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Evangelia E. Tsironi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Irene Gottlob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleni Papageorgiou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papageorgiou, E., Asproudis, I., Maconachie, G. et al. The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257, 1061–1078 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04254-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04254-w

Keywords

search

Navigation