Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

23G pars plana vitrectomy for vitreal floaters: prospective assessment of subjective self-reported visual impairment and surgery-related risks during the course of treatment

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Quantifying the subjective impairment due to floaters based on an indication-specific questionnaire and setting its change between prior to and 3/12 months after elective vitrectomy in relation to surgical risks.

Methods

Single-arm longitudinal observational multicenter study. Sixty-four floater patients underwent 23G pars plana vitrectomy; simultaneous phacoemulsification was excluded. An overall self-rated impairment index (SRI) and sub-indices SRI were calculated on the basis of a modified Visual Quality of Life questionnaire (VQoL), which addresses general vision, glare, near-sight problems and mobility of floaters. SRI ranged from 0 to 100% (maximum impairment). Secondary endpoints included corrected visual acuity and complications.

Results

Data were collected prior to and 3 (n = 64) and 12 (n = 62) months after surgery. The median overall SRI improved (44, 12, 11%) with a statistically significant median reduction of 69% (95% confidence interval 50–89%) 3 months postop. The median sub-SRIs improved for glare (50, 17, 17%), near sight problems (50, 17, 8%), and mobility of floaters (43, 5, 0%). Sixteen eyes needed cataract surgery during follow-up (10 showed cataract already prior to vitrectomy). Eight complications were reported (6 intra-operative retinal holes, 2 post-operative retinal detachments).

Conclusion

For the majority of floater patients, subjective impairment was profoundly reduced by vitrectomy. Benefits of surgery prevailed despite complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milston R, Madigan MC, Sebag J (2016) Vitreous floaters: etiology, diagnostics, and management. Surv Ophthalmol 61(2):211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.11.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sebag J (1989) The vitreous—structure, function an pathobiology. Springer-Verlag, New Yor

    Google Scholar 

  3. Serpetopoulos CN, Korakitis RA (1998) An optical explanation of the entoptic phenomenon of ‘clouds’ in posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18(5):446–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sebag J, Yee KM, Wa CA, Huang LC, Sadun AA (2014) Vitrectomy for floaters: prospective efficacy analyses and retrospective safety profile. Retina 34(6):1062–1068. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagle AM, Lim WY, Yap TP, Neelam K, Au Eong KG (2011) Utility values associated with vitreous floaters. Am J Ophthalmol 152(1):60–65 e61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo EH, Haddock LJ, Bhardwaj N, Fortun JA (2016) Cataracts induced by neodymium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lysis of vitreous floaters. Br J Ophthalmol https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309005

  7. Cowan LA, Khine KT, Chopra V, Fazio DT, Francis BA (2015) Refractory open-angle glaucoma after neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lysis of vitreous floaters. Am J Ophthalmol 159(1):138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mason JO 3rd, Neimkin MG, JOt M, Friedman DA, Feist RM, Thomley ML, Albert MA (2014) Safety, efficacy, and quality of life following sutureless vitrectomy for symptomatic vitreous floaters. Retina 34(6):1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Nie KF, Crama N, Tilanus MA, Klevering BJ, Boon CJ (2013) Pars plana vitrectomy for disturbing primary vitreous floaters: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(5):1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2205-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schulz-Key S, Carlsson JO, Crafoord S (2011) Longterm follow-up of pars plana vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: complications, outcomes and patient satisfaction. Acta Ophthalmol https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01682.x

  11. Tan HS, Mura M, Lesnik Oberstein SY, Bijl HM (2011) Safety of vitrectomy for floaters. Am J Ophthalmol 151(6):995–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoerauf H, Muller M, Laqua H (2003) Vitreous body floaters and vitrectomy with full visual acuity. Ophthalmologe 100(8):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-002-0766-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiff WM, Chang S, Mandava N, Barile GR (2000) Pars plana vitrectomy for persistent, visually significant vitreous opacities. Retina 20(6):591–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frost NA, Sparrow JM, Durant JS, Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Brookes ST (1998) Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 5(4):185–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen MN, Rahimy E, Ho AC, Garg SJ (2015) Management of symptomatic floaters: current attitudes, beliefs, and practices among vitreoretinal surgeons. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46(8):859–865. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20150909-11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Castilla-Marti M, van den Berg TJ, de Smet MD (2015) Effect of vitreous opacities on straylight measurements. Retina 35(6):1240–1246. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiao L, Wan X, Cai X, Vasudevan B, Xiong Y, Tan J, Guan Z, Atchison DA, Wang N (2014) Comparison of ocular modulation transfer function determined by a ray-tracing aberrometer and a double-pass system in early cataract patients. Chin Med J 127(19):3454–3458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia GA, Khoshnevis M, Yee KM, Nguyen-Cuu J, Nguyen JH, Sebag J (2016) Degradation of contrast sensitivity function following posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.005

  19. Feng H, Adelman RA (2014) Cataract formation following vitreoretinal procedures. Clin Ophthalmol 8:1957–1965. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S68661

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. NA Frost for the permission to use the Visual Quality of Life questionnaire for developing the Floaters questionnaire. Furthermore, the authors are grateful to Mrs. Nicole Waack for study coordination, to Mrs. Levka Dahmen for assistance in data management, and to Mrs. Tara Rödter and to Mrs. Chui Lai Choo-Ludwig for revising the paper focusing on syntax as well as comprehensibility.

The OcuNet Trial Group thank Alcon Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, for supporting the study financially.

Participating study physicians

Dr. H. Kaymak, Gerl-Gruppe, Augenklinik Ahaus, Ahaus

Prof. K. Ludwig, Ober Scharrer Gruppe, ARIS MVZ Nuremberg, Nuremberg

Dr. O. Cartsburg, Augen-Zentrum-Nordwest, Augenpraxis Ahaus, Ahaus

Dr. A. Lommatzsch, Augenärzte am St. Franziskus Hospital, Muenster

Dr. T. Littan, Augenpraxisklinik Lohr, Lohr

Dr. U. Weigmann, Augenklinik Dr. Hoffmann, Braunschweig

Dr. P. Requat, Augenklinik Dr. Hoffmann, Braunschweig

Dr. A. Bunse, Augenärzte Hamburg-Bergedorf, Dr. Bunse Dr. Elsner Dr. Pörksen, Hamburg

Dr. S. Spang, Augen-Partner-Gruppe, Augenzentrum Tuttlingen, Tuttlingen

Funding

This study was funded by Alcon Pharma GmbH, Freiburg: funding was used for clinical project management resources and administrated by U Hahn (OcuNet).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Hahn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The coordinating Independent Ethics Committee (Bavaria) gave unrestricted consent to the investigation design at hand by its vote in 08 / 2011; so did all local Committees subsequently in accordance with this vote.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

The floater-specific questionnaire will be made available on request. Please contact Ursula Hahn (ursula.hahn@uni-wh.de).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hahn, U., Krummenauer, F. & Ludwig, K. 23G pars plana vitrectomy for vitreal floaters: prospective assessment of subjective self-reported visual impairment and surgery-related risks during the course of treatment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256, 1089–1099 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3979-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3979-8

Keywords

Navigation