References
Chatziralli I, Theodossiadis G, Kabanarou SA, Parikakis E, Xirou T, Mitropoulos P, Theodossiadis P (2017) Ranibizumab versus dexamethasone implant for central retinal vein occlusion: the Ranidex study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3719-5 Published online June 15, 2017
Freund KB, Korobelnik JF, Deveny R et al (2015) Treat-and extend regimens with anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases. Retina 35:1489–1506
Gover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, Chalam KV (2009) Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis). Am J Ophthalmol 148:266–271
Kuppermann BD, Haller JA, Bandello F (2014) Onset and duration of visual acuity improvement after dexamethasone intravitreal implant in eyes with macular edema due to vcretinal vein occlusion. Retina 34:1743–1749
Campochiaro PA, Brown DM, Awh CC, Lee SY, Gray S, Saroj N, Murahashi WY, Rubio RG (2011) Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: twelve-month outcomes of a phase lll study. Ophthalmology 118:2041–2049
Haller JA, Bandello F, RJr B, Blumenkranz MS, Gilles M, Heier J, Loewenstein A, Yoon YH, Jiao J, Li XY, Whitcup SM (2011) Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema related to branch or central retinal vein occlusion: twelve-month study results. Ophthalmology 118(Ozurdex Geneva Study Group):2453–2560
Călugăru D, Călugăru M (2015) Intravitreal bevacizumab in acute central/hemicentral retinal vein occlusions: three-year results of a prospective clinical study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 31:78–86
Călugăru D, Călugăru M (2017) Treatment patterns of ranibizumab intravitreal injection and dexamethasone intravitreal implant for retinal vein occlusion in the USA. Eye 31:1112–1113
Călugăru D, Călugăru M (2017) Baseline choroidal thickness as a predictor for treatment oucomes in central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 176:257–258
Călugăru D, Călugăru M (2017) Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in retinal vein occlusion: real-life data from a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:427–428
Acknowledgments
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No financial disclosures. Both authors (D.C. and M.C.) were involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
The authors have full control over the primary data and they agree to allow Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review their data if requested.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Călugăru, D., Călugăru, M. Ranibizumab versus dexamethasone implant for central retinal vein occlusion: the Ranidex study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255, 2073–2075 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3749-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3749-z