Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

iStent inject in phakic open angle glaucoma

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness and complication profile of the iStent inject implantation among different open angle glaucoma subgroups were analyzed.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort outcome study, 35 consecutive patients suffering from glaucoma (primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) N = 17, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEX) N = 15, and pigmentary glaucoma (PG) N = 3) were treated with the iStent inject. The intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of antiglaucoma medications before and after surgery were evaluated.

Results

In POAG, the mean IOP at 6 months measured 14.19 ± 1.38 mmHg with an average decrease of 33 % from preoperative IOP (p < 0.001), and 15.33 ± 1.07 mmHg with an average decrease of 35 % in PEX (p < 0.001), respectively. The number of antiglaucoma medications significantly decreased from 2.19 ± 0.91 to 0.88 ± 0.62 in POAG (p < 0.001) and from 2.33 ± 1.23 to 1.04 ± 0.30 in PEX (p < 0.001) after 6 months. In PG, IOP before surgery was 28.31 ± 3.21 mmHg and the number of antiglaucoma medications was 3.66 ± 0.57. One day after surgery, IOP decreased significantly to 12.33 mmHg ± 4.93 (p < 0.001). Within four weeks after surgery, IOP was raised above 30 mmHg in every patient. To exclude a steroid response, topical steroids were stopped, but IOP did not decrease. To exclude blockage, Nd:YAG – laser treatment of the visible opening of the iStents was performed. Since the IOP stayed high and escalation of antiglaucoma medication was insufficient to control IOP, trabeculectomy was performed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, implantation of the iStent inject has the ability to lower the postoperative IOP significantly in POAG and PEX after a short follow-up of 6 months with a favorable risk profile. However, limitation of this surgical procedure in phakic PG may exist and need to be investigated in further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Tezel G, Kass MA, Kolker AE, Wax MB (1996) Comparative optic disc analysis in normal pressure glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 103(12):2105–2113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cvenkel B, Kontestabile AS (2011) Correlation between nerve fibre layer thickness measured with spectral domain OCT and visual field in patients with different stages of glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(4):575–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ritch R (1994) Exfoliation syndrome. The most common identifiable cause of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 3(2):176–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Niyadurupola N, Broadway DC (2008) Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma–a major review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 36(9):868–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Le K, Saheb H (2014) iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 8(9):1937–1945

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Voskanyan L, García-Feijoó J, Belda JI, Fea A, Jünemann A, Baudouin C, Synergy Study Group (2014) Prospective, unmasked evaluation of the iStent® inject system for open-angle glaucoma: synergy trial. Adv Ther 31(2):189–201

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fea AM, Belda JI, Rękas M, Jünemann A, Chang L, Pablo L, Voskanyan L, Katz LJ (2014) Prospective unmasked randomized evaluation of the iStent inject(®) versus two ocular hypotensive agents in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 8(5):875–882

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh Y-J, Giamporcaro JE, for the US iStent Study Group (2011) Randomized evaluation of the trabecular microbypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology 118(3):459–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fea AM (2010) Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with micro-bypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(3):407–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE, for the iStent Study Group (2012) Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(8):1339–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luebke J, Boehringer D, Neuburger M, Anton A, Wecker T, Cakir B, Reinhard T, Jordan JF (2015) Refractive and visual outcomes after combined cataract and trabectome surgery: a report on the possible influences of combining cataract and trabectome surgery on refractive and visual outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(3):419–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jordan JF, Wecker T, van Oterendorp C, Anton A, Reinhard T, Boehringer D, Neuburger M (2013) Trabectome surgery for primary and secondary open angle glaucomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(12):2753–2760

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klamann MK, Gonnermann J, Maier AK, Ruokonen PC, Torun N, Joussen AM, Bertelmann E (2013) Combined clear cornea phacoemulsification in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma associated with cataract: significance of trabecular aspiration and ab interno trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(9):2195–2199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ting JL, Damji KF, Stiles MC, Trabectome Study Group (2012) Ab internotrabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(2):315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Belovay GW, Nagi A, Chan BJ, Rateb M, Ahmed II (2012) Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(11):1911–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D, García-Vidal SE, Fernández-Pérez C, García-Sánchez J, García-Feijoó J (2013) Mid-term evaluation of the new Glaukos iStent with phacoemulsification in coexistent open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 97(10):1250–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

All authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants, participation in speakers’ bureaus, memberships, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, and knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias K. J. Klamann.

Additional information

Necip Torun and Eckart Bertelmann contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klamann, M.K.J., Gonnermann, J., Pahlitzsch, M. et al. iStent inject in phakic open angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 941–947 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3014-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3014-2

Keywords

Navigation