Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of rarebit perimetry in evaluation of functional outcome after successful macular hole and epiretinal membrane surgery

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Nilsson M, Wanger, Martin L (2006) Perception of very small visual stimuli in the fovea- normative dana for the rarebit foveal test. Clin Exp Optom 89(2):81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin L, Wanger P (2004) New perimetric techniques- a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 13:268–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson M, von Wendt G, Wagner P, Martin LM (2007) Early detection of macular changes in diabetic patients using rarebit fovea test and optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1596–1598

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vislisel JM, Doyle CK, Johnson CA, Wall M (2011) Variability of rarebit and standard perimetry sizes I and III in normal. Optom Vis Sci 88(5):635–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nilsson M, Abdiu O, Laurell CG, Martin L (2010) Rarebit perimetry and fovea test before and after cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88(4):479–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lana Dujmović.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dujmović, L., Benčić, G. & Vatavuk, Z. The role of rarebit perimetry in evaluation of functional outcome after successful macular hole and epiretinal membrane surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 167–168 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2825-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2825-x

Keywords

Navigation