Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term outcomes of needle revision of failing deep sclerectomy blebs

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report on long-term outcomes of mitomycin C (MMC)-augmented needle revision of failing deep sclerectomy (DS) blebs.

Methods

Retrospective database search of all needle revisions with MMC for DS blebs between 2002 and 2008 was conducted. Sixty-six eyes of 66 patients were included in the study. Subconjunctival MMC 0.01–0.02 mg was injected 15 min before needle revision. Complete success was defined as intraocular pressure ≤ 18 mmHg or 20 % decrease from baseline with no glaucoma medications or further surgical procedures. Partial success was based on the same criteria, but with medications.

Results

Mean follow-up after index needle revision was 67.8 ± 24.8 months (range 1–10 years). The mean number of needle revisions was 1.6 ± 0.8 (range 1–4). Two or more procedures were done in 31 eyes (47.0 %). Mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 23.2 ± 6.9 mmHg. Complete and partial success rates were 64 % and 71 % at 1 year, 57 % and 68 % at 3 years, and 40 % and 58 % at 5 years after surgery, respectively. Early needle revision, within 6 months of index surgery, was significantly associated with failure, both on uni- and multivariate tests. Significant complications included delayed hypotony in five eyes (7.6 %), delayed bleb leak in two eyes (3.0 %), endophthalmitis in one eye (1.5 %), and corneal oedema in two eyes (3.0 %).

Conclusions

Needle revision with subconjunctival MMC may successfully lower the intraocular pressure in eyes with a failing DS bleb in the long term. Complications known to be associated with trabeculectomy and MMC were anticipated and observed in our DS group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kazakova D, Roters S, Schnyder CC et al (2002) Ultrasound biomicroscopy images: long-term results after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:918–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muller M, Hoerauf H, Geerling G et al (2006) Filtering bleb evaluation with slit-lamp-adapted 1310-nm optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 31:909–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiou AG, Mermoud A, Hediguer SE, Schnyder CC, Faggioni R (1996) Ultrasound biomicroscopy of eyes undergoing deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Br J Ophthalmol 80:541–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aptel F, Dumas S, Denis P (2009) Ultrasound biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography imaging of filtering blebs after deep sclerectomy with new collagen implant. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:223–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A (2011) Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma 20:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lachkar Y, Neverauskiene J, Jeanteur-Lunel MN (2004) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: a 6-year retrospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol 14:26–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bissig A, Rivier D, Zaninetti M, Sharaawy T, Mermood A, Roy S (2008) Ten years follow-up after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Glaucoma 17:680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galassi F, Giambene B (2008) Deep sclerectomy with SkGel implant: 5-year results. J Glaucoma 17:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anand N, Pilling R (2010) Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy: outcomes. Acta Ophthalmol 88:110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mavrakanas N, Mendrinos E, Shaarawy T (2010) Postoperative IOP is related to intrascleral bleb height in eyes with clinically flat blebs following deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and mitomycin. Br J Ophthalmol 94:410–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez-Buenaga R, Rebolleda G, Casas-Llera P, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Perez-Lopez M (2002) A comparison of intrascleral bleb height by anterior segment OCT using three different implants in deep sclerectomy. Eye (Lond) 26:552–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anand N, Wechsler D (2012) Deep sclerectomy with mitomycin C in eyes with failed glaucoma surgery and pseudophakia. Eye Lond 26:70–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shin DH, Kim YY, Ginde SY, Kim PH, Eliassi-Rad B, Khatana AK, Keole NS (2001) Risk factors for failure of 5-fluorouracil needling revision for failed conjunctival filtration blebs. Am J Ophthalmol 132:875–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Broadway DC, Bloom PA, Bunce C, Thiagarajan M, Khaw PT (2004) Needle revision of failing and failed trabeculectomy blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil: survival analysis. Ophthalmology 111:665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawkins AS, Flanagan JK, Brown SV (2002) Predictors for success of needle revision of failing filtration blebs. Ophthalmology 109:781–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rotchford AP, King AJ (2008) Needling revision of trabeculectomies bleb morphology and long-term survival. Ophthalmology 115:1148–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mardelli PG, Lederer CM Jr, Murray PL, Pastor SA, Hassanein KM (1996) Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 103:1946–1955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anand N, Khan A (2009) Long-term outcomes of needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: a comparative safety and efficacy report. J Glaucoma 18:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cantor LB, Mantravadi A, WuDunn D et al (2003) Morphologic classification of filtering blebs after glaucoma filtration surgery: the Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. J Glaucoma 12:266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz AL, Van Veldhuisen PC, Gaasterland DE, Ederer F, Sullivan EK, Cyrlin MN (1999) The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 5. Encapsulated bleb after initial trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 127:8–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feldman RM, Tabet RR (2008) Needle revision of filtering blebs. J Glaucoma 17:594–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno-Montanes J, Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete FJ (2007) Prognostic value of gonioscopy after deep sclerectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:702–708

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vuori ML (2003) Complications of Neodymium:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:573–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mansouri K, Mendrinos E, Shaarawy T, Dosso AA (2011) Visualization of the trabeculo-Descemet membrane in deep sclerectomy after Nd:YAG goniopuncture: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Arch Ophthalmol 129:1305–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mietz H (1996) The toxicology of mitomycin C on the ciliary body. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 7:72–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maestrini HA, Cronemberger S, Matoso HD et al (2011) Late needling of flat filtering blebs with adjunctive mitomycin C: efficacy and safety for the corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology 118:755–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shetty RK, Wartluft L, Moster MR (2005) Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using high-dose mitomycin. C J Glaucoma 14:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kessing SV, Heegaard S, Nissen OI (2006) Intrastromal diathermal keratostomy: a new micropenetrating clear-cornea glaucoma procedure. J Glaucoma 15:437–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kessing SV, Flesner P, Jensen PK (2006) Determinants of bleb morphology in minimally invasive, clear-cornea micropenetrating glaucoma surgery with mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 15:84–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Iwach AG, Delgado MF, Novack GD, Nguyen N, Wong PC (2003) Transconjunctival mitomycin-C in needle revisions of failing filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 110:734–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sihota R, Dada T, Gupta SD, Sharma S, Arora R, Agarwal HC (2000) Conjunctival dysfunction and mitomycin C-induced hypotony. J Glaucoma 9:392–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mietz H, Roters S, Krieglstein GK (2005) Bullous keratopathy as a complication of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:1284–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sauder G, Jonas JB (2006) Limbal stem cell deficiency after subconjunctival mitomycin C injection for trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 141:1129–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sihota R, Sharma T, Agarwal HC (1998) Intraoperative mitomycin C and the corneal endothelium. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:80–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McDermott ML, Wang J, Shin DH (1994) Mitomycin and the human corneal endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol 112:533–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roy S, Thi HD, Feusier M, Mermood A (2012) Crosslinked sodium hyaluronate implant in deep sclerectomy for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 22:70–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

There was no prior financial support and none of the contributing authors has any financial interest related to this manuscript.

None of the authors has conflict of interests with the submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antigoni Koukkoulli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koukkoulli, A., Musa, F. & Anand, N. Long-term outcomes of needle revision of failing deep sclerectomy blebs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 99–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2810-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2810-4

Keywords

Navigation