Skip to main content
Log in

Usability of a gravity- and tilt-compensated sensor with data logging function to measure posturing compliance in patients after macular hole surgery: a pilot study

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To investigate the use of a small gravity- and tilt-compensated, head-fixed sensor with data-logging function to measure compliance and head posture of patients after macular hole surgery based on the recommendation of a face-down position. Main outcome measures were the median inclination, the times with correct or incorrect head position and the acceptance/annoyance of a data-logging device.

Methods

A small battery-driven electronic sensor device with gravity and tilt compensations was placed within a plastic box and fixed on a patient’s head with a headband. Face-down position data were logged every half second for 24 h after macular hole surgery and were stored on a memory card.

Results

Thirteen patients were involved (seven females, six males, median age, 68 years, range, 50–75 years), two cases with early dropout. Ten of 11 datasets could be evaluated showing a complete data record file. The average percentage for face-down >45° was 18 % within 24 h and 17 % in the daytime. The median inclination was −6.7° (min: −89.7° max: 90°). The sensor system was well tolerated and disturbance was rated low by all ten patients.

Conclusions

While the patients’ face-down posture considerably varied over time in extent and continuity, the assessment might lead to optimizing the patients’ compliance with the optimal position. Results showed an excellent acceptance of the motion sensor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly NE, Wendel RT (1991) Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 109:654–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandra A, Charteris DG, Yorston D (2011) Posturing after macular hole surgery: a review. Ophthalmol J Int d'ophtalmol Int J Ophthalmol Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde 226(Suppl 1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Solebo AL, Lange CAK, Bunce C, Bainbridge JW (2011) Face-down positioning or posturing after macular hole surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD008228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008228.pub2

  4. Dhawahir-Scala FE, Maino A, Saha K, Mokashi AA, McLauchlan R, Charles S (2008) To posture or not to posture after macular hole surgery. Retina 28:60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaefer H, Koss MJ, Singh P, Koch F (2012) Significant Improvement in Compliance with the face-down position after vitrectomy and gas tamponade. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 229:928–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krohn J (2005) Duration of face-down positioning after macular hole surgery: a comparison between 1 week and 3 days. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:289–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nadal J, Delas B, Pinero A (2012) Vitrectomy without face-down posturing for idiopathic macular holes. Retina 32:918–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carvounis PE, Kopel AC, Kuhl DP, Heffez J, Pepple K, Holz ER (2008) 25-gauge vitrectomy using sulfur hexafluoride and no prone positioning for repair of macular holes. Retina 28:1188–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iezzi R, Kapoor KG (2013) No face-down positioning and broad internal limiting membrane peeling in the surgical repair of idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cullen R (1998) Macular hole surgery: helpful tips for preoperative planning and postoperative face-down positioning. J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol 17:179–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah SP, Manjunath V, Rogers AH, Baumal CR, Reichel E, Duker JS (2013) Optical coherence tomography-guided facedown positioning for macular hole surgery. Retina 33:356–362

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madgula IM, Costen M (2008) Functional outcome and patient preferences following combined phaco-vitrectomy for macular hole without prone posturing. Eye 22:1050–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma D, Jalabi MW, Watts WG, Naylor G (2002) Evaluation of posturing in macular hole surgery. Eye 16:701–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatham A, Banerjee S (2010) Face-down posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 94:626–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waterman H, Harker R, MacDonald H, McLaughlan R, Waterman C (2005) Evaluation of an action research project in ophthalmic nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 52:389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Alexander Leitritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leitritz, M.A., Ziemssen, F., Voykov, B. et al. Usability of a gravity- and tilt-compensated sensor with data logging function to measure posturing compliance in patients after macular hole surgery: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252, 739–744 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2517-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2517-y

Keywords

Navigation