Advertisement

Assessment of OCT measurements as prognostic factors in myopic macular hole surgery without foveoschisis

  • Micol AlkabesEmail author
  • Leyla Padilla
  • Cecilia Salinas
  • Paolo Nucci
  • Lucia Vitale
  • Francesco Pichi
  • Anniken Burès-Jelstrup
  • Carlos Mateo
Retinal Disorders

Abstract

Background

To assess the role of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) measurements as prognostic factors in myopic macular hole (MMH) surgery.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 42 eyes of 42 patients (Spherical equivalent > −6.00 D) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for MMH without foveoschisis. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with preoperative BCVA, age, degree of myopia and seven preoperative OCT measurements: macular hole (MH) base, MH minimum diameter, MH height, Hole Form Factor (HFF), Macular Hole Index (MHI), Diameter Hole Index (DHI) and Tractional Hole Index (THI).

Results

Primary and final anatomical success rate were 83.3 % (35/42) and 90.5 % (38/42), respectively. Four patients deferred reoperation and three underwent a second surgical approach to achieve MH closure. A posterior staphyloma was observed in 27 of 42 patients, and in three of them the MH was located in the apex of the staphyloma. Two of these three cases showed an open MH after the first surgery. Postoperative visual acuity improved in 22/42 (52.4 %) patients, worsened in 7/42 (16.7 %) and remained unchanged in 13/42 (30.9 %). Only MH minimum diameter (P = 0.03) and HFF (P = 0.02) correlated significantly with postoperative BCVA.

Conclusions

Minimum diameter and HFF are strongly correlated with postoperative visual outcomes in cases of MMH. Since analyzing MH configuration seems to improve the anatomical success rate after vitreous surgery in highly myopic patients, these parameters should be preoperatively evaluated by SD-OCT.

Keywords

High myopia Myopic macular hole Posterior staphyloma Optical coherence tomography Vitreoretinal surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are greatly indebted to Giovanni Taibbi, Davide Ausili and Daniela Gilardi for their precious help in the statistical analysis.

Financial disclosures

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Knapp H (1869) Ueber isolirte zerreissungen der aderhaut in folge von traumen auf dem augapfel. Arch Augenheilkd 1:6–29Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coppé AM, Ripandelli G (2003) Optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of vitreoretinal disorders of the macula in highly myopic eyes. Semin Ophthalmol 18(2):85–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faghihi H, Hajizadeh, Riazi-Esfahani M (2010) Optical coherence tomographic findings in highly myopic eyes. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 5(2):110–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tano Y (2002) Pathologic myopia: where are we now? Am J Ophthalmol 134(5):645–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curtin BJ (1977) The posterior staphyloma of pathologic myopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 75:67–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oie Y, Ikuno Y, Fujikado T, Tano Y (2005) Relation of posterior staphyloma in highly myopic eyes with macular hole and retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 49(6):530–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumura N, Ikuno Y, Tano Y (2004) Posterior vitreous detachment and macular hole formation in myopic foveoschisis. Am J Ophthalmol 138(6):1071–1073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sayanagi K, Ikuno Y, Tano Y (2006) Reoperation for persistent myopic foveoschisis after primary vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 141(2):414–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kono T, Takesue Y, Shiga S (2006) Scleral resection technique combined with vitrectomy for a macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmologica 220(3):159–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakagawa N, Parel JM, Murray TG, Oshima K (2000) Effect of scleral shortening on axial length. Arch Ophthalmol 118(7):965–968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanaka T, Ando F, Usui M (2005) Episcleral macular buckling by semirigid shaped-rod exoplant for recurrent retinal detachment with macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Retina 25:147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qian J, Jiang YR (2010) Anatomic evaluation of macular holes with silicone oil tamponades in highly myopic eyes using optical coherence tomography. Eur J Ophthalmol 20(5):938–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bonnet M, Semiglia R (1993) Late recurrences after successful surgery for retinal detachment with macular hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231:347–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seike C, Kusaka S, Sakagami K, Ohashi Y (1997) Reopening of macular holes in highly myopic eyes with retinal detachments. Retina 17(1):2–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sayanagi K, Ikuno Y, Tano Y (2005) Macular hole diameter after vitrectomy for macular hole and retinal detachment. Retina 25(5):608–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yonekawa Y, Hirakata A, Inoue M, Okada AA (2010) Spontaneous closure of a recurrent myopic macular hole previously repaired by pars plana vitrectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 89(6):e536–e537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254(5035):1178–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Velthoven ME, Faber DJ, Verbraak FD, Van Leeuwen TG, De Smet MD (2007) Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 26:57–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Sakata V, Girkin CA (2009) Optical coherence tomography of the retina and optic nerve—a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37(1):90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J (2004) Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 137:156–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coppé AM, Ripandelli G, Parisi V, Varano M, Stirpe M (2005) Prevalence of asymptomatic macular holes in highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmology 112(12):2103–2109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaucher D, Erginay A, Lecleire-Collet A, Haouchine B, Puech M, Cohen SY, Massin P, Gaudric A (2008) Dome-shaped macula in eyes with myopic posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol 145(5):909–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Panozzo G, Mercanti M (2004) Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1455–1460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gass JDM (1988) Idiopathic senile macular holes: its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 106:629–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson RN, Gass JDM (1998) Idiopathic macular holes: observations, stages of formation and implications of surgical intervention. Ophthalmology 95:917–924Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kusuhara S, Teraoka Escaño MF, Fujii S, Nakanishi Y, Tamura Y, Nagai A, Yamamoto H, Tsukahara Y, Negi A (2004) Prediction of postoperative visual outcome based on hole configuration by optical coherence tomography in eyes with idiopathic macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 138(5):709–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Piñero DP, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P (2008) Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 92(5):640–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ip MS, Baker BJ, Duker JS, Reichel E, Baumal CR, Gangnom R, Puliafito CA (2002) Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 120:29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Benson SE, Schlottmann PG, Bunce C, Charteris DG (2008) Comparison of macular hole size measured by optical coherence tomography, digital photography, and clinical examination. Eye (Lond) 22(1):87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uemoto R, Yamamoto S, Aoki T, Tsukahara I, Yamamoto T, Takeuchi S (2002) Macular configuration determined by optical coherence tomography after idiopathic macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Br J Ophthalmol 86(11):1240–1242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoerauf H (2007) Predictive values in macular hole repair. Br J Ophthalmol 91(11):1415–1416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alkabes M, Salinas C, Vitale L, Burès A, Nucci P, Mateo C (2011) En face optical coherence tomography of inner retinal defects after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(11):8349–8355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Song Y, Lee BR, Shin YW, Lee YJ (2012) Overcoming segmentation errors in measurements of macular thickness made by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 32(3):569–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, Duker JS, Reichel E, Schuman JS, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG (1995) Optical coherence tomography of macular hole. Ophthalmology 102:748–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Desai VN, Hee MR, Puliafito CA (1999) Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. In: Madreperla SA, McCuen BW (eds) Macular hole: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 37–47Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, Priglinger SG, Gass CA, Kampik A (2007) Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35(3):208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A (2002) Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 86(4):390–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Salman AG (2006) Healing pattern of myopic macular hole based on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Saudi J Ophth 20(2):124–130Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Georgalas I, Ezra E (2007) Delayed closure after surgery for a full-thickness macular hole in a highly myopic eye. Can J Ophthalmol 42(2):341–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ikuno Y, Tano Y (2003) Early macular holes with retinoschisis in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 136(4):741–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ikuno Y, Sayanagi K, Oshima T, Gomi F, Kusaka S, Kamei M, Ohji M, Fujikado T, Tano Y (2003) Optical coherence tomography findings of macular hole and retinal detachment after vitrectomy in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 136:477–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kokame GT (1995) Early stage of macular hole in a severely myopic eye. Am J Ophthalmol 119(2):240–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sun CB, Liu Z, Xue AQ, Yao K (2010) Natural evolution from macular retinoschisis to full-thickness macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Eye (Lond) 24(12):1787–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Saka N, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Sueyoshi S, Nagaoka N, Hayashi W, Hayashi K, Moriyama M, Kojima A, Yasuzumi K, Yoshida T, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M (2010) Long-term changes in axial length in adult eyes with pathologic myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 150(4):562–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hsiang HW, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Hayashi K, Moriyama M, Yoshida T, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M (2008) Clinical characteristics of posterior staphyloma in eyes with pathologic myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 146(1):102–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micol Alkabes
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Leyla Padilla
    • 2
  • Cecilia Salinas
    • 2
  • Paolo Nucci
    • 3
  • Lucia Vitale
    • 3
  • Francesco Pichi
    • 3
  • Anniken Burès-Jelstrup
    • 2
  • Carlos Mateo
    • 2
  1. 1.IMO—Instituto de Microcirugía OcularBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.IMO—Instituto de Microcirugía OcularBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Clinica Oculistica—Ospedale San GiuseppeUniversità di MilanoMilanItaly
  4. 4.University Eye ClinicSan Giuseppe HospitalMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations