Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) and wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK: comparison of contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations at 1 year

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To compare 1-year results of the refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) flex technique performed as a commercial bilateral simultaneous procedure to a matched group of wavefront-optimized Femto-Lasik for correction of myopia and astigmatism with emphasis on contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations (HOA).

Methods

In this retrospective study 44 eyes of 22 patients with spherical equivalent (SE) of −5.13 D who underwent ReLEx were matched to 50 eyes of 25 patients with SE of −5.42 D treated by wavefront-optimized Femto-Lasik. We used Carl Zeiss Meditec (CZM) VisuMax® femtosecond laser system with a 200 kHz repetition rate. In addition, for Femto-LASIK, MEL 80 Excimer Laser (CZM) with aspheric ablation profiles was used for ablation.

Results

At 1 year, the mean SE in the ReLEx group was −0.23 ± 0.35 D and in the Femto-LASIK group −0.15 ± 0.27 D. The mesopic contrast sensitivity of ReLEx treated eyes at 12 and 18 cpd improved from 1.49 and 0.99 to 1.54 and 1.1 respectively. In the Femto-LASIK group the numbers were pre-op 1.51 and 1.03, and after 1 year 1.54 and 1.06. The high-order aberrations (HOA) after ReLEx changed from 0.15 to 0.23 μm, and after Femto-LASIK from 0.175 to 0.320 μm (p = 0.0023).

Conclusion

At 1 year, wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK produced similar refractive outcomes to ReLEx® flex with better, but non-significant accuracy. In contrast, ReLEx® flex showed significantly less induction of HOA and better mesopic mid-term contrast sensitivity then the wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann CH, Gille A, Bissmann W, Stobrawa G, Sticker M, Bischoff M, Blum M (2008) First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum M, Kunert K, Schröder M, Sekundo W (2010) Femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: preliminary 6-month results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1019–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum M, Sekundo W (2010) Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx). Ophthalmology 107:967–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M (2011) Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 95:335–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:127–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blum M, Kunert KS, Engelbrecht C, Dawczynski J, Sekundo W (2010) Femtosekunden Lentikel-Extraktion (FLEx): 12-monats-Ergebnisse bei myopem Astigmatismus. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 227:961–965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens JD, Sekundo W (2003) Wellenfrontanalyse und adaptive Optiken. Ophthalmologe 100:593–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah R, Shah S (2011) Effect of scanning patterns on the results of femtosecond laser lenticule extraction refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1636–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riau AK, Angunawela RI, Chaurasia SS, Lee WS, Tan DT, Mehta JS (2011) Early corneal wound healing and inflammatory responses following refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:6213–6221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Sekundo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gertnere, J., Solomatin, I. & Sekundo, W. Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) and wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK: comparison of contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations at 1 year. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 1437–1442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2220-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2220-4

Keywords

Navigation