Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pain score of patients undergoing single spot, short pulse laser versus conventional laser for diabetic retinopathy

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To compare pain score of single spot short duration time (20 milliseconds) panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with conventional (100 milliseconds) PRP in diabetic retinopathy.

Methods

Sixty-six eyes from 33 patients with symmetrical severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (non-PDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. One eye of each patient was randomized to undergo conventional and the other eye to undergo short time PRP. Spot size of 200 μm was used in both laser types, and energy was adjusted to achieve moderate burn on the retina. Patients were asked to mark the level of pain felt during the PRP session for each eye on the visual analog scale (VAS) and were examined at 1 week, and at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months.

Results

Sixteen women and 17 men with mean age 58.9 ± 7.8 years were evaluated. The conventional method required a mean power of 273 ± 107 mW, whereas the short duration method needed 721 ± 406 mW (P = 0.001). An average of 1,218 ± 441 spots were delivered with the conventional method and an average of 2,125 ± 503 spots were required with the short duration method (P = 0.001). Average pain score was 7.5 ± 1.14 in conventional group and 1.75 ± 0.87 in the short duration group (P = 0.001). At 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months following PRP, the mean changes of central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline in the conventional group remained 29.2 μm (P = 0.008), 40.0 μm (P = 0.001), and 40.2 μm (P = 0.007) greater than the changes in CMT for short time group.

Conclusion

Patient acceptance of short time single spot PRP was high, and well-tolerated in a single session by all patients. Moreover, this method is significantly less painful than but just as effective as conventional laser during 6 months of follow-up. The CMT change was more following conventional laser than short time laser.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1981) Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy (DRS) findings, DRS report number 8. Ophthalmology 88:583–600

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tonello M, Costa RA, Almeida FP, Barbosa JC, Scott IU, Jorge R (2008) Panretinal photocoagulation versus PRP plus intravitreal bevacizumab for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (IBeHi study). Acta Ophthalmol 86:385–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zakrzewski PA, O’Donnell HL, Lam WC (2009) Oral versus topical diclofenac for pain prevention during panretinal photocoagulation. Ophthalmology 116:1168–1744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu WC, Hsu KH, Chen TL, Hwang YS, Lin KK, Li ML, Shih CP, Lai CC (2006) Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial. Eye 20:712–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tesha PE, Giavedoni LR, Berger AR, Altomare F, Chow DR, Navajas EV, Yoganathan P, Wong DT, Principe A (2010) SubconjunctivalLidocaine before laser treatment, a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 117:1810–1814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aideanu D, Taylor P, McAndrew P, Hildreth A, Deady JA, Stee DH (2006) Double masked randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of paracetamol in reducing pain in panretinal photocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol 90:713–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson C, Waterman H (2009) Pain relief during panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: a national survey. Eye 23:2233–2237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ko BW, Shim JW, Lee BR, Cho HY (2009) Analgesic effects of tramadol during panretinal photocoagulation. Korean J Ophthalmol 23:273–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muqit MMK GR, Gray JCB, McLauchlan R, Henson DB, Young LB, Patton N, Charles SJ, Turner GS, Stanga PE (2010) Pain responses of Pascal 20 ms multi-spot and 100 ms single-spot panretinal photocoagulation: Manchester Pascal Study, MAPASS report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1493–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luttrull JK, Musch DC, Spink CA (2008) Subthreshold diode micropulsepanretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Eye 22:607–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blumenkranz MS, Yellachich D, Andersen DE, Wiltberger MW, Mordaunt D, Marcellino GR, Palanker D (2006) Semiautomated patterned scanning laser for retinal photocoagulation. Retina 26:370–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain A, Blumenkranz MS, Paulus Y, Wiltberger MW, Andersen DE, Huie P, Palanker D (2008) Effect of pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in retinal photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol 126:78–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Hussainy S, Dodson PM, Gibson JM (2008) Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times. Eye 22:96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagpal M, Marlecha S, Nagpal K (2010) Comparison of laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy using 532-nm standard laser versus multi spot pattern scan laser. Retina 30:452–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vujosevic S, Bottega E, Casciano M, Pilotto E, Convento E, Midena E (2010) Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular edema: subthresholdmicropulse diode laser versus modified early treatment diabetic retinopathy study laser photocoagulation. Retina 30:908–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laursen ML, Moeller F, Sander B, Sjoelie AK (2004) Subthresholdmicropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1173–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Figueira J, Khan J, Nunes S, Sivaprasad S, Rosa A, de Abreu JF, Cunha-Vaz JG, Chong NV (2009) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing subthresholdmicropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 93:1341–1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Muqit MM, Wakely L, Stanga PE, Henson DB, Ghanchi FD (2010) Effects of conventional argon panretinal laser photocoagulation on retinal nerve fibre layer and driving visual fields in diabetic retinopathy. Eye 24:1136–1142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Muqit MM, Gray JC, Marcellino GR, Henson DB, Young LB, Charles SJ, Turner GS, Stanga PE (2009) Fundus autofluorescence and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of 100 and 20 millisecond Pascal retinal photocoagulation treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 93:518–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Desmettre TJ, Mordon SR, Buzawa DM, Mainster MA (2006) Micropulse and continuous wave diode retinal photocoagulation: visible and subvisible lesion parameters. Br J Ophthalmol 90:709–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mainster MA (1999) Decreasing retinal photocoagulation damage: principles and techniques. Sem Ophthalmol 14:200–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roider J, Hillenkamp F, Flotte T, Birngruber R (1993) Microphotocoagulation: selective effects of repetitive short laser pulses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8643–8647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paulus YM, Jain A, Gariano RF, Stanzel BV, Marmor M, Blumenkranz MS, Palanker D (2008) Healing of retinal photocoagulation lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:5540–5545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shimura M, Yasuda K, Nakazawa T, Kano T, Ohta S, Tamai M (2003) Quantifying alterations of macular thickness before and after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy and good vision. Ophthalmology 110:2386–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SB, Yun YJ, Kim SH, Kim JY (2010) Changes in macular thickness after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy and no macular edema. Retina 30:756–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Henricsson M, Heiji A (1994) The effect of panretinal photocoagulation on visual acuity, visual field and on subjective visual impairment in preproliferative and early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 72:570–575

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Higgins KE, Meyers SM, Jaffe MJ, Roy MS, de Monasterio FM (1986) Temporary loss of foveal contrast sensitivity associated with panretinal photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol 104:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McDonald HR, Schatz H (1985) Visual loss following panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 92:388–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McDonald HR, Schatz H (1985) Macular edema following panretinal photocoagulation. Retina 5:5–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Diabetic retinopathy clinical research network, Brucker AJ, Qin H, Antoszyk AN, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Glassman AR, Gross JG, Kollman C, Wells JA (2009) Observational study of the development of diabetic macular edema following panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation given in 1 or 4 sittings. Arch Ophthalmol 127:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yi Q, Bamroongsuk P, McCarty DJ, Mukesh BN, Harper CA (2003) Clinical outcomes following laser photocoagulation treatment for diabetic retinopathy at a large Australian ophthalmic hospital. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 31:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaiser RS, Maguire MG, Grunwald JE, Lieb D, Jani B, Brucker AJ, Maguire AM, Ho AC, Fine SL (2000) One-year outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 129:178–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grants from Tehran University of Medical Science.

Financial Interests

The authors do not have any financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Roozbahani.

Additional information

Authors have full control of all primary data, and they agree to allow Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review their data upon request.

Clinical trial registration number: www.irct.ir IRCT138811073178N1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirshahi, A., Lashay, A., Roozbahani, M. et al. Pain score of patients undergoing single spot, short pulse laser versus conventional laser for diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 1103–1107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2167-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2167-5

Keywords

Navigation