Association between reading speed, cycloplegic refractive error, and oculomotor function in reading disabled children versus controls
Approximately one in ten students aged 6 to 16 in Ontario (Canada) school boards have an individual education plan (IEP) in place due to various learning disabilities, many of which are specific to reading difficulties. The relationship between reading (specifically objectively determined reading speed and eye movement data), refractive error, and binocular vision related clinical measurements remain elusive.
One hundred patients were examined in this study (50 IEP and 50 controls, age range 6 to 16 years). IEP patients were referred by three local school boards, with controls being recruited from the routine clinic population (non-IEP patients in the same age group). A comprehensive eye examination was performed on all subjects, in addition to a full binocular vision work-up and cycloplegic refraction. In addition to the cycloplegic refractive error, the following binocular vision related data was also acquired: vergence facility, vergence amplitudes, accommodative facility, accommodative amplitudes, near point of convergence, stereopsis, and a standardized symptom scoring scale. Both the IEP and control groups were also examined using the Visagraph III system, which permits recording of the following reading parameters objectively: (i) reading speed, both raw values and values compared to grade normative data, and (ii) the number of eye movements made per 100 words read. Comprehension was assessed via a questionnaire administered at the end of the reading task, with each subject requiring 80% or greater comprehension.
The IEP group had significantly greater hyperopia compared to the control group on cycloplegic examination. Vergence facility was significantly correlated to (i) reading speed, (ii) number of eye movements made when reading, and (iii) a standardized symptom scoring system. Vergence facility was also significantly reduced in the IEP group versus controls. Significant differences in several other binocular vision related scores were also found.
This research indicates there are significant associations between reading speed, refractive error, and in particular vergence facility. It appears sensible that students being considered for reading specific IEP status should have a full eye examination (including cycloplegia), in addition to a comprehensive binocular vision evaluation.
KeywordsBinocular vision Reading Visagraph Vergence Accommodation
Acknowledgements / Disclosures
The authors have no financial interests in any of the products or testing procedures discussed in this paper. No conflicts of interest or conflicting affiliations are reported as of the date of submission of this paper. The authors have full control of all primary data, and agree to allow Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review any data if requested. The authors wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Patricia Hyrnchak (Faculty, University of Waterloo) for valuable comments on the manuscript prior to submission.
- 5.Young B, Collier-Gary K, Schwing S (1994) Visual factors: a primary cause of failure in beginning reading. J Optom Vis Dev 32(1):58–71Google Scholar
- 7.Fulk G, Goss D (2001) Relation between refractive status and teacher evaluation of school achievement. J Optom Vis Dev 32:80–82Google Scholar
- 13.Scheimann M, Blaskey P, Ciner EB, Gallaway M, Parisi M, Pollack K, Selznick R (1990) Vision characteristics of individuals indentified as Irlen filter candidates. J Am Optom Assoc 61:600–605Google Scholar
- 18.Crawford C (2002) Learning Disabilities in Canada: Economic Costs to Individuals, Families and Society. Prepared for the Learning Disabilities Association of Canada by the Roeher InstituteGoogle Scholar
- 19.Quaid PT, Hamilton-Wright A (2010) Diagnosing extraocular muscle dysfunction in clinic: comparing computerized hess analysis, Park’s 3-step test and a novel 3-step test. J Optom Vis Dev 41(3):143–157Google Scholar
- 21.Sassanov O, Sassonov Y, Koslowe CK, Shneor E (2010) The effect of test sequence on measurement of positive and negative fusional vergence. J Optom Vis Dev 41(1):24–27Google Scholar
- 30.O’Donaghue L, Rudnicka A, McClelland J, Logan N, Saunders K (2012) Visual acuity measures do not reliably detect childhood refractive error: an epidemiological study. PLoS ONE 7(3):1–7Google Scholar
- 32.Gallaway M, Boas M (2007) The impact of vergence and accommodative therapy on reading eye movements and reading speed. J Optom Vis Dev 38(3):115–120Google Scholar