Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restoration of the photoreceptor layer and improvement of visual acuity in successfully treated optic disc pit maculopathy: a long follow-up study by optical coherence tomography

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate by optical coherence tomography (OCT) the evolution of the photoreceptor layer and its association with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in optic disc pit (ODP) maculopathy after successful surgical treatment.

Methods

Fourteen eyes of 14 patients were included in this study, and followed up from 36 to 95 months (mean 57.36 ± 18.32 months). The follow-up period started at the time of complete subretinal fluid absorption. Examination was performed by time-domain OCT before and after treatment. Spectral-domain OCT was used after treatment. Parameters assessed were type of elevation, central foveal thickness, time elapsed from onset to treatment, type of treatment, BCVA, and inner segment outer segment (IS/OS) junction line. The IS/OS junction was characterized after treatment as intact, interrupted, or absent (not distinguishable).

Results

Significant restoration of the IS/OS junction line was first noticed between 6 and 12 months after fluid absorption (p = 0.02; Wilcoxon signed rank test). Restoration was continuous up to the 24th month of postoperative examination after fluid absorption (p = 0.14; Wilcoxon signed rank test). BCVA was 0.99 ± 0.38 logMar before treatment, 0.81 ± 0.26 logMar (p = 0.011; paired t-test) immediately after fluid absorption and 0.61 ± 0.33 logMar (p = 0.026; one-way ANOVA) 24 months after fluid resolution. BCVA was significantly positively correlated with the integrity of the IS/OS junction line during follow-up (Pearson r = 0.775; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The IS/OS junction restoration cannot be detected immediately after fluid resolution in the majority of cases. It became evident 6–12 months later and was completed 24 months after fluid absorption. Improvement in BCVA was noticed only during the first 2 years of follow-up. No significant changes were noticed in BCVA or the IS/OS line after 2 years. Among the studied variables, the final photoreceptor layer condition and BCVA immediately after fluid absorption are the main factors predicting final BCVA after successful surgical treatment of ODP maculopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiethe T (1882) Ein Fall von angelborener Difformität der Sehnervenpapille. Arch Augenheiikd 11:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kranenburg E (1960) (1960) Crater-like holes in the optic disc and central serous retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 64:912–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gass JDM (1969) Serous detachment of the macula secondary to congenital pit of the optic nerve head. Am J Ophthalmol 67:821–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferry AP (1963) Macular detachment associated with congenital pit of the optic nerve head. Pathologic findings in two cases simulating malignant melanoma of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol 70:346–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krivoy D, Gentile R, Liebmann JM, Stegman Z, Rosen R, Walsh JB, Ritch R (1996) Imaging congenital optic disc pits and associated maculopathy using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 114:165–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lincoff H, Schiff W, Krivoy D, Ritch R (1996) Optic coherence tomography of optic disc pit maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 122:264–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Imamura Y, Zweifel SA, Fujiwara T, Freund KB, Spaide RF (2010) High-resolution optical coherence tomography findings in optic pit maculopathy. Retina 30:1104–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akiba J, Kakehashi A, Hikichi T, Trempe CL (1993) Vitreous findings in cases of optic nerve pits and serous macular detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 116:38–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Theodossiadis PG, Grigoropoulos VG, Emfietzoglou J, Theodossiadis GP (2007) Vitreous findings in optic disc pit maculopathy based on optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:1311–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugar HS (1964) Congenital pits of the optic disc. Am J Ophthalmol 57:833–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown GC, Shields JA, Patty BE, Goldberg RE (1979) Congenital pits of the optic nerve head. I. Experimental studies in collie dogs. Arch Ophthalmol 97:1341–1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Theodossiadis GP, Ladas ID, Panagiotidis DN, Kollia AC, Voudouri AN, Theodossiadis PG (1999) Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographic findings in congenital optic disc pit associated with macular detachment. Retina 19:6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Theodossiadis GP, Panopoulos M, Kollia AK, Georgopoulos G (1992) Long-term study of patients with congenital pit of the optic nerve and persistent macular detachment. Acta Ophthalmol 70:495–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugar HS (1967) Congenital pits in the optic disc and their equivalents (congenital colobomas and colobomalike excavations) associated with submacular fluid. Am J Ophthalmol 63:298–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Theodossiadis G, Theodossiadis P, Malias J, Moschos M, Moschos M (2002) Preoperative and postoperative assessment by multifocal electroretinography in the management of optic disc pits with serous macular detachment. Ophthalmology 109:2295–2302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Theodossiadis G (1977) Evolution of congenital pit of the optic disc with macular detachment in photocoagulated and non photocoagulated eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 84:620–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirakata A, Okada AA, Hida T (2005) Long-term results of vitrectomy without laser treatment for macular detachment associated with an optic disc pit. Ophthalmology 112:1430–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai S, Polkinghorne P (2003) Peeling the internal limiting membrane in serous macula detachment associated with congenital optic disc pit. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 31:272–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghosh YK, Banerjee S, Konstantinidis A, Athanasiadis I, Kirkby GR, Tyagi AK (2008) Surgical management of optic disc pit associated maculopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:142–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Georgalas I, Petrou P, Koutsandrea C, Papaconstadinou D, Ladas I, Gotzaridis E (2009) Optic disc pit maculopathy treated with vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas tamponade: a report of two cases. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:324–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cox MS, Witherspoon CD, Morris RE, Flynn HW (1988) Evolving techniques in the treatment of macular detachment caused by optic nerve pits. Ophthalmology 95:889–896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Arumí J, Guraya BC, Espax AB, Castillo VM, Ramsay LS, Motta RM (2004) Optical coherence tomography in optic pit maculopathy managed with vitrectomy-laser-gas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:819–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Theodossiadis GP (1996) Treatment of maculopathy associated with optic disc pit by sponge explant. Am J Ophthalmol 121:630–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Theodossiadis GP, Theodossiadis PG (2001) Optical coherence tomography in optic disk pit maculopathy treated by the macular buckling procedure. Am J Ophthalmol 132:184–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Spaide RF, Fisher Y, Ober M, Stoller G (2006) Surgical hypothesis: inner retinal fenestration as a treatment for optic disc pit maculopathy. Retina 26:89–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iida T, Hagimura N, Sato T, Kishi S (2000) Evaluation of central serous chorioretinopathy with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 129:16–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ojima Y, Tsujikawa A, Yamashiro K, Ooto S, Tamura H, Yoshimura N (2010) Restoration of outer segments of foveal photoreceptors after resolution of central serous chorioretinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 54:55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanis MJ (2006) Integrity of foveal cones in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome assessed with OCT and foveal reflection analyzer. Br J Ophthalmol 90:795–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sikorski BL, Wojtkowski M, Kaluzny JJ, Szkulmowski M, Kowalczyk A (2008) Correlation of spectral optical coherence tomography with fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1552–1557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith AJ, Telander DG, Zawadzki RJ, Choi SS, Morse LS, Werner JS, Park SS (2008) High-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetric findings after macula-off retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 115:1923–1929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Benson SE, Schlottmann PG, Bunce C, Xing W, Charteris DG (2006) Optical coherence tomography analysis of the macula after vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:1179–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS, Paunescu LA, Kowalevicz AM, Hartl I, Drexler W, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Duker JS (2005) Comparison of ultrahigh- and standard-resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging macular pathology. Ophthalmology 112:1922–1935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Duker JS, Paunescu LA, Drexler W, Baumal CR, Puliafito CA, Reichel E, Rogers AH, Schuman JS (2004) Comparison of ultrahigh- and standard-resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging macular hole pathology and repair. Ophthalmology 111:2033–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Freund KB (2008) Photoreceptor outer segment abnormalities as a cause of blind spot enlargement in acute zonal occult outer retinopathy-complex diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 146:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sano M, Shimoda Y, Hashimoto H, Kishi S (2009) Restored photoreceptor outer segment and visual recovery after macular hole closure. Am J Ophthalmol 147:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Theodossiadis PG, Grigoropoulos VG, Theodossiadis GP (2011) The significance of the external limiting membrane in the recovery of photoreceptor layer after successful macular hole closure: a study by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica 225:176–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Cisiecki S, Adelman R, Nawrocki J (2008) Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery: a spectral optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:823–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H, Murakami Y, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, Tano Y (2009) Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair: imaging analysis by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 116:519–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N, Sakamoto A, Tsujikawa A, Kita M, Yoshimura N (2009) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 29:232–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Theodossiadis PG, Theodossiadis GP, Charonis A, Emfietzoglou I, Grigoropoulos VG, Liarakos VS (2011) The photoreceptor layer as a prognostic factor for visual acuity in the secondary epiretinal membrane after retinal detachment surgery: imaging analysis by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 151:973–980

    Google Scholar 

  41. Barr CC (1990) The histopathology of successful retinal reattachment. Retina 10:189–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cook B, Lewis GP, Fisher SK, Alder R (1995) Apoptotic photoreceptor degeneration in experimental retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:990–996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lewis GP, Charteris DG, Sethi CS, Leitner WP, Linberg KA, Fisher SK (2002) The ability of rapid retinal reattachment to stop or reverse the cellular and molecular events initiated by detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2412–2420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kusaka S, Toshimo A, Ohashi Y, Sakaue E (1998) Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments. Jpn J Ophthalmol 42:218–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure information

The above authors confirm that the manuscript with the above title submitted for consideration for publication in Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is not related with any proprietary or commercial interests. No sponsoring organizations have been involved, and no grants were received from any organization or institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George P. Theodossiadis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theodossiadis, G.P., Grigoropoulos, V.G., Liarakos, V.S. et al. Restoration of the photoreceptor layer and improvement of visual acuity in successfully treated optic disc pit maculopathy: a long follow-up study by optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250, 971–979 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1918-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1918-z

Keywords

Navigation