Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selective laser trabeculoplasty induced changes in the thickness of ciliary body and iris evaluated by ultrasound biomicroscopy

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is widely used for the treatment of glaucoma. The main target tissue of this treatment modality is trabecular meshwork. We aimed to detect the SLT-induced changes in the thickness of ciliary body (CBT) and iris (IT), quantitatively.

Methods

Thirty-one patients treated by SLT were examined by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) at different locations of ciliary body and iris at four quadrants, before and after (3rd, 7th, and 30th days) SLT. The IT was measured at various locations; 500 μm anterior to the scleral spur (IT1), 2 mm from the iris root (IT2) and near the pupillary edge where the iris thickness was maximum (IT3) at four quadrants. The CBT at positions 1 and 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur were measured (CBT1-2). Additionally, intraocular pressure (IOP) levels were measured in all visits and post-laser 1 h.

Results

There were statistically significant higher CBT values at 3rd and 7th-day measurements in the study compared to pre-treatment levels (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). CBT2 values at day 30 were similar compared to pre-treatment values (overall p = 0.140), but CBT1 values at day 30 were not exactly similar compared to pre-treatment values in superior and nasal quadrants (overall p = 0.027). IT values obtained in the 3rd and 7th days were significantly higher in all quadrants and regions when compared to the pre-treatment values (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the IT values at the 30th day in comparison to the pre-treatment values (p = 0.45).

Conclusions

The results suggest that SLT induces prominent increases in CBT and IT returning to baseline thickness in a month, which may be caused by inflammation, vascular engorgement, or mechanical muscular contraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van der Zypen E, Frankhauser F (1982) Lasers in the treatment of chronic simple glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 102(PT 1):147–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Latina MA, Park C (1995) Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulsed and CW laser interactions. Exp Eye Res 60:359–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Buskirk EM, Pond V, Rosenquist RC, Acott TS (1984) Argon laser trabeculoplasty. Studies of mechanisms of action. Ophthalmology 91:1005–1010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer TR, Noecker RJ (2001) Comparison of the morphological changes after selective laser trabeculoplasty and argon laser trabeculoplasty in human eye bank eyes. Ophthalmology 108:773–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Latina MA, Sibayan SA, Shin DH, Noecker RJ, Marcellino G (1998) Q-switched 532-nmNd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clinical study. Ophthalmology 105:2082–2088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley JM, Anderssohn AM, Colvis CM, Parshley DE, Zhu XH, Ruddat MS, Samples JR, Acott TS (2000) Mediation of laser trabeculoplasty-induced matrix metalloproteinase expression by IL-1b and TNF Alpha. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:422–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guzey M, Vural H, Satıcı A, Karadede S, Doğan Z (2001) Increase of free oxygen radicals in aqueous humor induced by selective Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty in the rabbit. Eur J Ophthalmol 11:47–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, Foster FS (1991) Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology 98:287–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Foster FS (1992) Ultrasound biomicroscopy of anterior segment structures in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 113:381–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Damji KF, Shah KC, Rock WJ, Bains HS, Hodge WS (1999) Selective laser trabeculoplasty vs argon laser trabeculoplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 83:718–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Juzych MS, Chopra V, Banitt MR, Hughes BA, Kim C, Goulas MT, Shin DH (2004) Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 111:1853–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melamed S, Epstein DL (1987) Alteration of aqueous humor outflow following argon laser argon laser trabeculoplasty in monkeys. Br J Ophthalmol 71:776–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cvenkel B, Hvala A, Drnovsek-Olup B, Gale N (2003) Acute ultrastructural changes of the trabecular meshwork after selective laser trabeculoplasty and low power argon laser trabeculoplasty. Lasers Surg Med 3:204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dueker DK, Norberg M, Johnson DH, Tschumper RC, Feeney-Burns L (1990) Stimulation of cell division by argon and Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty in cynomolgus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:115–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tello C, Liebmann J, Potash SD, Cohen H, Ritch R (1994) Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3549–3552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Urbak SF, Pederson JK, Thorsen TT (1998) Ultrasound biomicroscopy. II. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:546–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marchini G, Ghilotti G, Bonadimani M, Babighian S (2003) Effects of 0.005% latanoprost on ocular anterior structures and ciliary body thickness. J Glaucoma 12:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen E, Golchin S, Blomdahl S (2004) A comparison between 90 degrees and 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma 13:62–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arıkan G, Yaman A, Ozbek Z, Saatci AO, Durak I (2008) Effect of diode laser cyclophotocoagulation on the anterior segment: An Orbscan Study. Cornea 27:152–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Macdonald JM, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF (1987) Effect of inflammation on the corneal endothelial pump and barrier. Curr Eye Res 6:1125–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Realini T, Charlton J, Hettlinger M (2010) The impact of anti-inflammatory therapy on intraocular pressure reduction following selective laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 41:100–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Matilla M, Macias JM, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Garcia-Sanchez J (2004) Selective vs argon laser trabeculoplasty: hypotensive efficacy, anterior chamber inflammation, and postoperative pain. Eye 18:498–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mermoud A, Pittet N, Herbort CP (1992) Inflammation patterns after laser trabeculoplasty measured with the laser flaremeter. Arch Ophthalmol 110:368–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Statistical analyses of the data were performed by MeStACon, Medical Statistics and Analysis Consultancy System, SBB Consulting GMBH, Vienna.

Financial Support

The authors of this paper have no financial/conflicting interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umit Aykan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aykan, U., Salcan, I., Yildirim, O. et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty induced changes in the thickness of ciliary body and iris evaluated by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 887–894 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1572-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1572-x

Keywords

Navigation