Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to “Mehdi-ODM; a modified digital monitoring of the occlusion therapy for amblyopia”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fronius M, Bachert I, Lüchtenberg M (2009) Electronic monitoring of occlusion treatment for amblyopia in patients aged 7 to 16 years. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247:1401–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simonsz HJ (1997) Call for collaborators on compliance measurements in amblyopia patching. Strabismus 5:224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simonsz HJ, Polling JR, Voorn R, van Leeuwen J, Meester H, Romijn C, Dijkstra BG (1999) Electronic monitoring of treatment compliance in patching for amblyopia. Strabismus 7:113–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fielder AR, Auld R, Irwin M, Cocker KD, Jones HS, Moseley MJ (1994) Compliance monitoring in amblyopia therapy. Lancet 343:547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fielder AR, Irwin M, Auld R, Cocker KD, Jones HS, Moseley MJ (1995) Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 79:585–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chopovska Y, Loudon SE, Cirina L, Zubcov A, Simonsz HJ, Lüchtenberg M, Fronius M (2005) Electronic recording of occlusion treatment for amblyopia: potential of the new technology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:539–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fronius M, Chopovska Y, Nolden J, Loudon SE, Lüchtenberg M, Zubcov A, Pepler L (2006) Occlusion treatment for amblyopia: assessing the performance of the electronic Occlusion Dose Monitor. Strabismus 14:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loudon SE, Polling JR, Simonsz HJ (2003) Electronically measured compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia is related to visual acuity increase. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241:176–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, on behalf of the MOTAS Cooperative (2004) Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3048–3054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Awan M, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I (2005) A randomized controlled trial of unilateral strabismic and mixed amblyopia using occlusion dose monitors to record compliance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:1435–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loudon SE, Fronius M, Looman CWN, Awan M, Simonsz B, van der Maas PJ, Simonsz HJ (2006) Predictors and a remedy for non-compliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the Occlusion Dose Monitor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4393–4400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ophthalmology Department, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Maria Fronius

Authors
  1. Maria Fronius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Fronius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fronius, M. Response to “Mehdi-ODM; a modified digital monitoring of the occlusion therapy for amblyopia”. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 947–948 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1492-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1492-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation