Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing the detection and agreement of parapapillary atrophy progression using digital optic disk photographs and alternation flicker

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Parapapillary atrophy (PPA) progression has been associated with progressive glaucoma, but has proven to be difficult to assess clinically. We compared inter- and intra-observer agreement using a novel automated alternation flicker technology and side-by-side digital photography inspection for the evaluation of PPA progression.

Methods

Consecutive patients with serial digital optic nerve photographs at least 1 year apart were included. Two graders (NR, BV) masked to image chronology assessed a set of photographs for progressive PPA using predefined criteria based on reference photographs containing mild, moderate, extensive or no PPA progression. At a separate session, the graders evaluated photographs using alternation flicker (EyeIC, Narberth, PA, USA) applying the same criteria. The order of patients and technique was randomized. Graders then assessed the same set of flickers and photographs a second time with the order of presentation reversed. The main outcome measure was the assessment of progressive PPA as identified by alternation flicker and digital photography inspection. Inter- and intra-observer agreement using each technique was assessed using the kappa statistic. A bootstrap method for comparing correlated kappa coefficients was used to assess statistical significance.

Results

Serial photographs from 131 eyes of 68 patients were evaluated. Both graders identified significantly more cases of PPA progression using flicker compared to photography (27–34% vs 8–13%; both p ≤ 0.003). Inter-observer agreement using flicker was better than using photographs (κ = 0.52 vs 0.18, p = 0.02). Intra-observer agreement was similar for both graders (photos: κ = 0.58 vs 0.57, p = 0.97; flicker: κ = 0.61 vs 0.70, p = 0.37). When progression was assessed by the number of progressive quadrants identified by each grader using a weighted kappa statistic, flicker inter-observer agreement was still moderate (κ = 0.45) and significantly better (p = 0.01) than photography, which showed poor agreement (κ = 0.15). Intra-observer agreement with a weighted kappa for quadrant progression was also similar for both graders (photos: grader 1 κ = 0.53 vs grader 2 κ = 0.52, p = 0.92; flickers: grader 1 κ = 0.58 vs grader 2 κ = 0.69, p = 0.22).

Conclusion

Flicker identified more cases of progressive PPA than photographic review. Agreement between observers was significantly higher when using the automated flicker technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 90(3):262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z, EMGT Group (2007) Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology 114:1965–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, Liu G, Li G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J (2004) Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study: Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology 111:1627–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group (1998) Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 126:487–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heijl M, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1268–1279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jonas JB, Naumann GO (1989) Parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy in normal and glaucoma eyes. II. Correlations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:919–926

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilensky JT, Kolker AE (1976) Peripapillary changes in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 81:341–345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Budde WM, Jonas JB (2004) Enlargement of parapapillary atrophy in follow-up of chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 137:646–654

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayakawa T, Sugiyama K, Tomita G, Kawase K, Onda E, Shinohara H, Tsuji A, Kitazawa Y (1998) Correlation of the peripapillary atrophy area with optic disc cupping and disc hemorrhage. J Glaucoma 7:306–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jonas JB (2005) Clinical implications of peripapillary atrophy in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:84–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uchida H, Ugurlu S, Caprioli J (1998) Increasing peripapillary atrophy is associated with progressive glaucoma. Ophthalmology 105:1541–1545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Radcliffe NM, Liebmann JM, Rozenbaum I, Sbeity Z, Sandler SF, Tello C, Ritch R (2008) Anatomic relationships between disc hemorrhage and parapapillary atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 146:735–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heltzer JM (1999) Progression of peripapillary atrophy. Ophthalmology 106:857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon, MO, Kass MA , The Ocular Hypertension Study Group (OHTS) (1997) Manual of Procedures, National Technical Information Service, Washington, DC. Publication PB97–148308NZ

  15. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B (1999) Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: Design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 106:2144–2153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, Cunha-Vaz J, Torri V, Adamsons I (2002) European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study: Design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 109:1612–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger JW, Patel TR, Shin DS, Piltz JR, Stone RA (2000) Computerized stereochronoscopy and alternation flicker to detect optic nerve head contour change. Ophthalmology 107:1316–1320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Funk J, Lagrèze W, Zeyen T, European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group (2002) [Flicker comparison of disc photographs: Sensitivity and specificity]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 219:862–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldmann H (1981) On sterochronoscopy. Doc Ophthalmol 51:269–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heijl A, Bengtsson B (1989) Diagnosis of early glaucoma with flicker comparisons of serial disc photographs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:2376–2384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cymbor M, Lear L, Mastrine M (2009) Concordance of flicker comparison versus side-by-side comparison in glaucoma. Optometry 80:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanbelle S, Albert A (2008) A bootstrap method for comparing correlated kappa coefficients. J Stat Comput Sim 78:1009–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bengtsson B, Krakau CE (1979) Flicker comparison of fundus photographs: A technical note. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:503–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1268–1279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ding Y, Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group (1999) Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 127:120, Erratum concerning: Am J Ophthalmol 127:487–497

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jampel HD, Friedman D, Quigley H, Vitale S, Miller R, Knezevich F, Ding Y (2009) Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 147:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK 2nd, Wilson MR, Gordon MO (2002) The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:701–713

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Greenberg Center, 1305 York Ave at East 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Brian L. VanderBeek & Nathan M. Radcliffe

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 635 West 165th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA

    Scott D. Smith

  3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, 1000 Wall St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA

    Brian L. VanderBeek

Authors
  1. Brian L. VanderBeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Scott D. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathan M. Radcliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian L. VanderBeek.

Additional information

Financial Statement

None of the authors have any financial conflicts with the material presented within this manuscript. No external funding was used for the conducting of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VanderBeek, B.L., Smith, S.D. & Radcliffe, N.M. Comparing the detection and agreement of parapapillary atrophy progression using digital optic disk photographs and alternation flicker. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 1313–1317 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1376-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1376-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation