Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distance doubling visual acuity test: A reliable test for nonorganic visual loss

  • Neuro-ophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To determine the value of the distance doubling visual acuity test in the diagnosis of nonorganic visual loss in a comparative observational case series.

Methods

Twenty-one consecutive patients with nonorganic visual acuity loss and 21 subjects with organic visual loss as controls were included. Best corrected visual acuity was tested at the normal distance of 5 meters using Landolt Cs. The patient was then repositioned and best corrected visual acuity was tested with the previous optotypes at double the distance via a mirror.

Results

Nonorganic visual acuity loss was identified in 21 of 21 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of distance-doubling visual acuity test in functional visual loss were found to be 100% (CI; 83%–100%) and 100% (CI; 82%–100%), respectively.

Conclusion

Distance doubling visual acuity test is widely used to detect nonorganic visual loss. Our results show that this test has a high specificity and sensitivity to detect nonorganic visual impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kathol RG, Cox TA, Corbett JJ, Thompson HS (1983) Functional visual loss: follow-up of 42 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 101:729–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keltner JL, May WN, Johnson CA, Post RB (1985) The California syndrome: functional visual complaints with potential economic impact. Ophthalmology 92:427–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramke J, Palagyi A, Naduvilath T, du Toit R, Brian G (2007) Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision in Timor-Leste. Br J Ophthalmol 91(9):1117–1121, doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.106559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller BW (1973) A review of practical tests for ocular malingering and hysteria. Surv Ophthalmol 17:241–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller NR, Keane JR (1998) Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of nonorganic disease. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ (eds) Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology, vol. 1, 5th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1765–1786

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keane JR (1982) Neuro-ophthalmic signs and symptoms of hysteria. Neurology 32:757–762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Helmbold X (1896) Ueber simulation. Monatsbl Augenheilkd 34:217–218

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mojon DS, Flueckiger P (2002) A new optotype chart for detection of nonorganic visual loss. Ophthalmology 109(4):810–815, doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)01050-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bach M, Maurer JP, Wolf ME (2008) Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients. Br J Ophthalmol 92(3):396–403, doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.130245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was partly funded by the OPOS Foundation, Stiftung zugunsten von Wahrnehmungsbehinderten, St. Gallen, Switzerland

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Stephane Mojon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinkernagel, S.M., Mojon, D.S. Distance doubling visual acuity test: A reliable test for nonorganic visual loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247, 855–858 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1019-9

Keywords

Navigation