Skip to main content

Effect of diagnostic occlusion in acquired trochlear nerve palsy

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology volume 247, pages 253–259 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Monocular occlusion eliminates the stimulus for fusional vergence. Diagnostic occlusion may therefore be helpful in isolating the genuine profile of the fundamental ocular motility disorder, which may be an important finding regarding both differential diagnosis of strabismus and dosage of surgery. We investigated the effect of diagnostic occlusion on the motility pattern of acquired trochlear nerve palsy.

Patients and methods

Forty-eight patients aged between 6 and 78 years (median 49 years) with unilateral trochlear nerve palsy were first examined without patching, and then after 3 days of diagnostic occlusion. The onset of palsy was 1–35 years before (median 2 years). Squint angles localized with a dark red glass in front of the non-paretic eye were measured at a distance of 2.5 m, using the Harms tangent screen. Vertical and cyclotorsional angles in primary position (PP), 25° abduction of the non-paretic eye (adduction of the paretic eye), and 25° downgaze were measured.

Results

The relation between hyperdeviation of the paretic eye and excyclodeviation (medians of the angles in degrees, ranges in brackets) before and after diagnostic occlusion was 5/5 and 4/6 (0;14/-1;10 and 0;19/2;13) in PP. In contralateral gaze, the relation was 8/5 and 8/6 (0;21/0;10 and 1;24/1;15), and in downgaze, 10/7 and 8/8 (0;21/1;14 and 0;23/3;18). The increase in excyclodeviation, though statistically significant (in PP, p = 0.0002) was small, with a median of 1° and large variability. The decrease in hyperdeviation was statistically significant in downgaze. The head-tilt phenomenon remained unchanged.

Conclusions

In patients with trochlear nerve palsy, diagnostic occlusion regularly causes an increase in excyclodeviation. In 25% of patients, this increase exceeds 3°. The more variable change in vertical deviation, and the lack in change in the head-tilt phenomenon, can be explained by the fact that central gain-modulation causing an increase in both vertical deviation and the head-tilt phenomenon is not reversible within the relatively short time of 3 days. Diagnostic occlusion can eliminate compensatory innervation and may thereby release the genuine motility pattern, but the occlusion can also induce artificial squint angles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Bielschowsky A, Ludwig A (1906) Das Wesen und die Bedeutung latenter Gleichgewichtsstörungen der Augen, insbesondere der Vertikalablenkungen. Albrecht v Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 62:400–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bielschowsky A (1913) Über die relative Ruhelage der Augen. Ber 39. Bericht 39. Versammlung ophthalmologische Gesellschaft Heidelberg. JF Bergmann, Wiesbaden, pp. 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brodsky MC (2005) Marlow Occlusion: Does it create or eliminate artifact? Strabismus 13:149–150 (Letter to the editor; author reply 151–152)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Demer JL, Miller JM (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of the functional anatomy of the superior oblique muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:906–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dowley D (1990) Heterophoria and monocular occlusion. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 10:29–32

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duane A, Berens C Jr (1921) Ocular movements. Ophthalmol Lit 17:53–70

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fink WH (1962) Surgery of the Vertical Muscles of the Eye. Thomas, Springfield IL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gräf M, Krzizok T, Kaufmann H (2005) Das Kopfneigephänomen bei einseitigen und beidseitig symmetrischen Trochlearisparesen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 222:142–149, doi:10.1055/s-2005-857929

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gräf M, Weihs J (2008) Operative Behandlung der erworbenen Trochlearisparese. Ophthalmologe [in press]

  10. Harms H (1941) Über die Untersuchung von Augenmuskellähmungen. Albrecht v Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 144:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hofmann FB, Bielschowsky A (1900) Über die der Willkür entzogenen Fusionsbewegungen der Augen. Pflügers Arch ges Physiol 80:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmes JM, Kaz KM (1994) Recovery of phorias following monocular occlusion. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 31:110–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones R (1980) Fusional vergences, sustained and transient components. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57:640–644

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufmann H (1981) Indikation zur Operation an den schrägen Augenmuskeln. Orthoptik–Pleoptik 9:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann H (2004) Strabismus: Ergebnisse und Indikationen verschiedener Operationsverfahren. In: Kaufmann H (ed) Strabismus. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 524–558

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kolling G (1986) Diagnostik und operative Korrektur von Vertikal- und Zyklodeviationen bei Störungen schräger Augenmuskeln. Dosis-Wirkungsbeziehung verschiedener Eingriffe. Habilitation-thesis. Fachbereich Humanmedizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany

  17. Kolling G, Eisfeld K (1985) Differentialdiagnose zwischen ein- und beidseitigem Strabismus sursoadductorius und erworbener Trochlearisparese. Orthoptik-Pleoptik 12:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kolling G, Kaufmann H (1984) Concerning diagnosis and therapy of cyclovertical deviations. In: Gregersen E (ed) Transactions 14th Meeting European Strabismological Association. Kopenhagen, pp 131–137

  19. Kolling GH, Steffen H, Baader A, Unnebrink K (2005) Diagnostic occlusion test in cases of unilateral strabismus sursoadductorius. Strabismus 13:53–54, doi:10.1080/09273970500265470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolling GH (2005) Marlow occlusion: Reply to the letter by Michael Brodsky. Strabismus 13:151–152, doi:10.1080/09273970500265470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kommerell G (2004) Augenmuskellähmungen. In: Kaufmann H (ed) Strabismus. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 442–465

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kommerell G (2004) Supranukleäre Augenbewegungsstörungen. In: Kaufmann H (ed) Strabismus. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 465–482

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kommerell G (2005) Adaptation der Augenstellung bei Trochlearisparese. Vortrag, 11. Strabologische und Neuroophthalmologische Falldemonstrationen, St.Gallen

  24. Kommerell G (1990) Adaptation des okulomotorischen Systems. Zeitschr prakt Augenheilkd 11:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kono R, Demer JL (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the functional anatomy of the inferior oblique muscle in superior oblique palsy. Ophthalmology 110:1219–1229, doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00331-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kushner BJ (2004) Ocular torsion: Rotations around the “WHY” axis. J AAPOS 8:1–12, doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2003.09.004

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lancaster WB (1944) Personal contribution in Roper KN, Bannon RE. Diagnostic values of monocular occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 31:316

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (1999) The Neurology of Eye Movements. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 286–318

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liesch A, Simonsz HJ (1993) Up- and downshoot in adduction after monocular patching in normal individuals. Strabismus 1:25–36, doi:10.3109/09273979309033850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marlow FW (1920) The influence of prolonged monocular occlusion in revealing errors of the muscle balance. Br J Ophthalmol 4:145–155, doi:10.1136/bjo.4.4.145

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marlow FW (1920) Prolonged monocular occlusion as a test for the muscle balance. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 18:275–290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marlow FW (1930) The prolonged occlusion test. Br J Ophthalmol 14:385–393, doi:10.1136/bjo.14.8.385

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marlow FW (1933) Recent observations on the prolonged occlusion test. Am J Ophthalmol 16:519–527

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marlow FW (1921) Prolonged monocular occlusion as a test for muscle balance. Am J Ophthalmol 4:238–250

    Google Scholar 

  35. Neikter B (1994) Effects of monocular occlusion on ocular alignment in normal subjects. Strabismus 2:67–77, doi:10.3109/09273979409022743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. von Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Theory and management of strabismus. Mosby, St. Louis, p 180

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson DA (1985) Bielschowsky head-tilt test – II. Quantitative mechanics of the Bielschowsky head-tilt test. Vision Res 25:1983–1988, doi:10.1016/0042-6989(85)90023-9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Roper KN, Bannon RE (1944) Diagnostic values of monocular occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 31:316–320

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rüßmann W, Neugebauer A, Fricke J (2004) Heterophorie und Asthenopie. In: Kaufmann H (ed) Strabismus. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 159–188

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shan X, Tian J, Ying HS, Quaia C, Optican LM, Walker MF et al (2007) Acute superior oblique palsy in monkeys: I. Changes in static eye alignment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2602–2611, doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1316

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Simonsz HJ, Crone RA, van der Meer J, Merckel-Timmer CF, van Mourik-Noordenbos AM (1985) Bielschowsky head-tilt test – I. Ocular counterrolling and Bielschowsky head-tilt test in 23 cases of superior oblique palsy. Vision Res 25:1977–1982, doi:10.1016/0042-6989(85)90022-7

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Slavin ML, Potash SD, Rubin SE (1988) Asymptomatic physiologic hyperdeviation in peripheral gaze. Ophthalmology 95:778–781

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Surdacki M, Wick B (1991) Diagnostic occlusion and clinical management of latent hyperphoria. Optom Vis Sci 68:261–269, doi:10.1097/00006324-199104000-00002

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Rijn LJ, Ten Tusscher MPM, De Jong I, Hendrikse F (1998) Asymmetrical vertical phorias indicating dissociated vertical deviation in subjects with normal binocular vision. Vision Res 38:2973–2978, doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00079-0

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Friedrichstrasse 18, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Michael Gräf & Johannes Weihs

Authors
  1. Michael Gräf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johannes Weihs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Gräf.

Additional information

This study was presented as a poster at the 105th Jahrestagung der DOG in Berlin 2007

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gräf, M., Weihs, J. Effect of diagnostic occlusion in acquired trochlear nerve palsy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247, 253–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0950-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0950-0

Keywords

  • Prolonged monocular occlusion
  • Marlow
  • Diagnostic occlusion
  • Phoria