Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abstract

Purpose

To review the epidemiology of serious ocular trauma presenting to Kasr El Aini Hospital, Cairo University.

Methods

This is a prospective epidemiological and clinical study of ocular trauma patients admitted to Kasr El Aini hospital during a 6-month period; January–June 2000. Cases were analyzed with respect to: (1) demographics, (2) time, place and nature of trauma, (3) type of injury, (4) time to receive care, and (5) management and visual outcomes following primary repair.

Results

One hundred and fifty three eyes of 147 patients (six bilateral injuries) sustaining serious ocular injury requiring hospitalization were included during the study period. Eighty percent of ocular trauma occurred in men (P < 0.001 chi-square test) with an average age of 22 years (ranging from 2 months to 76 years). There were 123 (80.4%) open globe injuries and 30 (19.6%) closed globe injuries. Of the open globe injuries, 48 eyes (31.4% of all eyes) were ruptured globes and 75 eyes (49% of all eyes) were lacerated globes (37 intraocular foreign bodies, 35 penetrating injuries and three perforating injuries, that is 24%, 23%, and 2% respectively of all injured eyes). Of the closed globe injuries, 5.9% had hyphema (33% of all patients), 4% lamellar lacerations, and 2.5% vitreous hemorrhage with retinal detachment. Most of the injuries occurred (39.5%) and presented (36.7%) between 12:00–5:59 pm. Eighteen patients (12%) presented after 24 hours, and nine patients (6%) 1 week after the time of trauma. Presenting visual acuity in 123 patients (123 eyes) was as follows: 98 (80%), ten (8%) and 15 (12%) patients had poor, moderate and good visual acuity respectively. Ten eyes developed posttraumatic endophthalmitis (8% of open globe injuries). On leaving the hospital, 77.1% eyes had a visual acuity of less then 1/60 (poor), 3.9% were between 1/60 and 6/60 (moderate), and 19% were 6/36 and/or better (good). Fifty-two (35%) patients were lost in follow-up: at 1 month, 60%, 7% and 33% of the rest had poor, moderate and good visual acuity respectively.

Conclusion

The majority of ocular trauma in our population was due to assaultive injuries occurring mainly in males. Open globe injuries were more common than closed globe injuries, and globe lacerations were more common than ruptured globes. Open globe injuries, especially ruptured globes, had the worst visual outcomes. The initial visual acuity correlated well with the final visual acuity. Immediate and comprehensive medical care is mandatory for ocular trauma patients. Educating the public is essential if we wish to prevent eye injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinton GS, Aaberg TM, Reeser FH, Topping TM, Abrams GW (1982) Surgical results in ocular trauma involving the posterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol 93(3):271–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Juan E, Sternberg P, Michels RG (1983) Penetrating ocular injuries, types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology 90:1318–1322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Esmaeli B, Elner SG, Schork MA, Elner VM (1995) Visual outcome after penetrating trauma, a clinicopathological study. Ophthalmology 102:393–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Groessl S, Nanda SK, Mieler WF (1993) Assault-related penetrating ocular injury. Am J Ophthalmol 116(1):26–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JH, Yang SJ, Kim DS, Kim JG, Yoon YH (2007) Fourteen-year review of open globe injuries in an urban Korean population. J Trauma 62(3):746–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JK, Kim JW, Lee J (1992) Clinical evaluation of penetration ocular injuries. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 33:919–924

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G (1996) A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 103(2):240–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G (1996) A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234(6):399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. May DR, Kuhn FP, Morris RE, et al. (2000) The epidemiology of serious eye injuries from the United States Eye Injury Registry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:153–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarty CA, Fu CL, Taylor HR (1999) Epidemiology of ocular trauma in Australia. Ophthalmology 106:1847–1852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Negrel AD, Thylefors B (1998) The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 5:143–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pieramici DJ, MacCumber MW, Humayun MU, Marsh MJ, de Juan E Jr (1996) Open-globe injury. Update on types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology 103(11):1798–1803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pieramici DJ, Au Eong KG, Sternberg P Jr, Marsh MJ (2003) The prognostic significance of a system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe) in open-globe injuries. J Trauma 54(4):750–754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman I, Maino A, Devadason D, Leatherbarrow B (2006) Open globe injuries: factors predictive of poor outcome. Eye 20(12):1336–1341. Epub 2005 Sep 23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rofail M, Lee GA, O’Rourke P (2006) Prognostic indicators for open globe injury. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34(8):783–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith AR, O’Hagan SB, Gole GA (2006) Epidemiology of open- and closed-globe trauma Presenting to Cairns Base Hospital, Queensland. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34(3):252–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sternberg Jr P, de Juan Jr E, Michels RG, Auer C (1984) Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol 98(4):467–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson CG, Kumar N, Billson FA, Martin F (2002) The etiology of perforating ocular injuries in children. Br J Ophthalmol 86(8):920–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thylefors B (1992) Epidemiological patters of ocular trauma. Aust NZ Ophthalmol 20:95–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong TY, Tielsch JM (1999) A population-based study on the incidence of severe ocular trauma in Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol 128:345–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zagelbaum BM, Tostanoski JR, Kerner DJ, Hersh PS (1993) Urban eye trauma. A one-year prospective study. Ophthalmology 100(6):851–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

No acknowledgment is disclosed. This work has not been sponsored by any institution.

Competing interest statement

The Authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any product mentioned in this paper.

Ethical approval

Approval for the study was obtained from the hospital’s ethical committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamer A. Macky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soliman, M.M., Macky, T.A. Pattern of ocular trauma in Egypt. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246, 205–212 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0720-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0720-4

Keywords

Navigation