Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Topical pimecrolimus does not prolong clear graft survival in a rat keratoplasty model

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Long-term application of topical steroids following penetrating keratoplasty is disadvantageous due to side effects (steroid response, cataract, surface disorders). In this study we investigated the efficacy of topical pimecrolimus regarding clear graft survival following allogeneic orthotopic keratoplasty in rats.

Methods

A total of 46 penetrating keratoplasties were performed using Fisher rats (allogeneic groups) and Lewis rats (syngeneic group) as donors and Lewis rats as recipients: group 1 (n = 11), allogeneic control without therapy; group 2 (n = 12), syngeneic control; group 3 (n = 11), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 40 mg/kg body weight; group 4 (n = 12), pimecrolimus 1% ointment twice daily. Four animals of each group were sacrificed for immunohistological evaluation on day 14. Therapy was administered for 18 days. The grafts were evaluated once every 3 days regarding opacity, oedema and vascularisation. Graft rejection was defined as total graft opacity.

Results

Mean rejection-free graft survival was 11.4 days in group 1 (allogeneic control), 100 days (total follow-up time) in group 2 (syngeneic control), 24.0 days in group 3 (MMF 40 mg/kg) and 11.6 days in group 4 (topical pimecrolimus). The immunohistological evaluation showed no statistically significant difference in cell infiltration of the grafts comparing groups 1 and 4.

Conclusions

Topical immunosuppression with pimecrolimus does not prolong graft survival in the allogeneic keratoplasty rat model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birnbaum F, Böhringer D, Sokolovska Y et al (2005) Immunosuppression with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty: a retrospective study. Transplantation 79:964–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Birnbaum F, Reis A, Reinhard T (2007) Immunosuppression following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 104:371–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birnbaum F, Reis A, Reinhard T (2007) Topical immunosuppressives after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 104:381–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gisondi P, Ellis CN, Girolomoni G (2005) Pimecrolimus in dermatology: atopic dermatitis and beyond. Int J Clin Pract 59:969–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbort CP, Matsubara M, Nishi M et al (1989) Penetrating keratoplasty in the rat: a model for the study of immunosuppressive treatment of graft rejection. Jpn J Ophthalmol 33:212–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hikita N, Lopez JS, Chan CC et al (1997) Use of topical FK506 in a corneal graft rejection model in Lewis rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:901–909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ling M, Gottlieb A, Pariser D et al (2005) A randomized study of the safety, absorption and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% applied twice or four times daily in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Treat 16:142–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer K, Birnbaum F, Reinhard T et al (2004) FTY720 prolongs clear corneal allograft survival with a differential effect on different lymphocyte populations. Br J Ophthalmol 88:915–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nell B, Walde I, Billich A et al (2005) The effect of topical pimecrolimus on keratoconjunctivitis sicca and chronic superficial keratitis in dogs: results from an exploratory study. Vet Ophthalmol 8:39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinhard T, Mayweg S, Reis A et al (2005) Topical FK506 as immunoprophylaxis after allogeneic penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty: a randomized clinical pilot study. Transpl Int 18:193–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinhard T, Reis A, Mayweg S et al (2002) Topical Fk506 in inflammatory corneal and conjunctival diseases. A pilot study. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 219:125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reis A, Birnbaum F, Reinhard T (2007) Systemic immunosuppressives after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 104:373–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reis A, Megahed M, Reinhard T et al (2000) Coadministration of the new macrolide immunosuppressant RAD and mycophenolate mofetil in experimental corneal transplantation. Transplantation 70:1397–1401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reis A, Reinhard T, Sundmacher R et al (1998) Effect of mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporin A, and both in combination in a murine corneal graft rejection model. Br J Ophthalmol 82:700–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Birnbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birnbaum, F., Schwartzkopff, J., Scholz, C. et al. Topical pimecrolimus does not prolong clear graft survival in a rat keratoplasty model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 1717–1721 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0657-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0657-7

Keywords

Navigation