Abstract
Background
Stickler syndrome is a hereditary oculo-systemic disorder where patients are predisposed to retinal detachments which are often complex and challenging to manage. Significant progress has been made regarding the molecular genetics of the condition; however, there is little recent literature on surgery for retinal detachment in Stickler syndrome. Our aim is to describe a population of Stickler patients presenting to Moorfields Eye Hospital with detachment from 1986 to 2003. We looked at patient characteristics, characteristics of detachment, management and anatomical and functional outcomes. We also aim to compare this group from 1986 to 2003 with a past group of Stickler patients treated at Moorfields between 1965 and 1985, reported by (Billington et al. in Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 104:875–879, 1985). This comparison of 20-year matched cohorts examined patient characteristics, features of detachment, management and anatomical outcome in the two groups using the same definitions as the earlier authors.
Results
In the Stickler group from 1986 to 2003, complete re-attachment rate was 67% for primary scleral-buckle surgery, 84.2% for primary vitrectomy and 78.57% for all surgery in 30 eyes of 23 patients. Overall in this group there was an average increase in Logmar visual acuity of 0.33 and 0.32 in patients undergoing primary cryo-buckle and primary vitrectomy surgery respectively. When comparing the two groups using Fisher’s exact test, we found that the group from 1986 to 2003 had significant improvement in re-attachment for detachments with multiple tears and for vitrectomy surgery, compared with the group from 1965 to 1985.
Conclusions
This study shows that despite complicated surgery and often multiple procedures, good anatomical outcomes were achieved as well as useful functional visual results after retinal detachment surgery in Stickler patients. It would also appear that when comparing the group of Stickler patients from 1986 to 2003 with the group from 1965 to 1985 improvements were seen in outcome from vitrectomy surgery and surgery for multiple breaks probably due to advances in technique and technology in vitreoretinal surgery, over the past 4 decades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad NN, McDonald-McGinn DM, Dixon P, Zackai EH, Tasman WS (1996) PCR assay confirms diagnosis in syndrome with variably expressed phenotype: mutation detection in Stickler syndrome. Journal of Medical Genetics 33:678–681
Ahmad N, Richards AJ, Murfett HC, Shapiro L, Scott JD, Yates JR, Norton J, Snead MP (2003) Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 116(3):234–237, Jan 30
Billington BM, Leaver PK, McLeod D (1985) Management of retinal detachment in the Wagner-Stickler syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 104:875–879
Hirose T, Lee KY, Schepens CL (1973) Wagners hereditary vitreoretinal degeneration and retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 89:176–185
Liberfarb RM, Hirose T, Holmes LB (1981) The Wagner-Stickler syndrome: a study of 22 families. The Journal of Paediatrics 99:394–399
Liberfarb RM, Levy HP, Roase PS, Wilkin DJ, Davis J, Balog JZ, Griffith AJ, Szymko-Bennet YM, Johnston JJ, Francomano CA (2003) The Stickler syndrome : genotype / phenotype correlation in 10 families with Stickler syndrome resulting from seven mutations in the type II collagen gene locus COL2A1. Genetics in Medicine 5(1):21–27
Parma ES, Korkko J, Hagler WS, Ala-Kokko L (2002) Radial perivascular retinal degeneration: a key to the clinical diagnosis of an ocular variant of Stickler syndrome with minimal or no systemic manifestations. Am J Ophthalmol 134:728–734
Robertson JE, Meyer SM (1989) Retina, vol 1. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 474–476
Sharma T, Gopal L, Shanmugam MP, Bhende PS, Agarwal R, Shetty N, Gopalkrishna M, Rao MK, Balusamy S (2002) Retinal detachment in Marfan syndrome; clinical characteristics and surgical outcome. Retina 22:423–428
Snead MP (1996) Hereditary vitreoretinopathy. Eye 10:653–663
Stickler GB, Hughes W, Houchin P (2001) Clinical features of hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy (Stickler syndrome): a survey. Genetics in Medicine 3(3):192–196
Thompson JA, Snead MP, Billington BM, Barrie T, Thompson JR, Sparrow JM (2002) National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. II Clinical outcomes. Eye 16:771–777
Van Camp G, Snoeckx RL, Hilgert N, van den Ende J, Fukuoka H, Wagatsuma M, Suzuki H, Smets RM, Vanhoenacker F, Declau F, Van de Heyning P, Usami S (2006) A new autosomal recessive form of Stickler syndrome is caused by a mutation in the COL9A1 gene. Am J Hum Genet 79(3):449–457
Vandenberg P (1993) Molecular basis of heritable connective tissue disease. Bioche Med Metabol Biol 49:1–12
Webb AC, Markus AF (2002) The diagnosis and consequences of Stickler syndrome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:49–51
Acknowledgements
Authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Ms Wen Xing, statistician Moorfields Eye Hospital.
All authors deny competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abeysiri, P., Bunce, C. & da Cruz, L. Outcomes of surgery for retinal detachment in patients with Stickler syndrome: a comparison of two sequential 20-year cohorts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 1633–1638 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0609-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0609-2