Abstract
Purpose
To assess whether the use of Orbscan pachymetry, as an alternative to ultrasound pachymetry, had an effect on the IOP-CCT relationship for Goldmann tonometry in normal human eyes.
Patients and methods
The right eye of 50 healthy subjects, aged 19 to 82 years, were assessed by Orbscan (three scans), and then central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by ultrasound pachymetry (three readings) and Goldmann tonometry performed (three readings).
Results
Goldmann tonometry indicated average IOP values from 9.7 to 20 mm Hg (group mean 14.3 ± 2.5 mm Hg) that were highly highly correlated with ultrasound pachymetry (r = 0.608, p < 0.001). Orbscan central zone pachymetry (2-mm sample zone) yielded higher values than ultrasound, averaging 0.591 ± 0.044 mm compared to 0.523 ± 0.037 mm (p < 0.001), with the differences between the instruments being proportional to the average thickness (p < 0.001; r = 0.461). Notwithstanding, the Goldmann tonometry values were still highly correlated with the Orbscan central zone thickness data (r = 0.595, p < 0.001); but, due to the difference in the thickness data generated by the two pachymeters, the absolute slope of the IOP–CCT relationship was slightly less if Orbscan measures were used, with or without use of the acoustic factor.
Conclusion
Orbscan measures of the thickness of a central corneal zone can be used to assess the impact of central corneal thickness on Goldmann tonometry data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134:221–242
European Glaucoma Society (2003) Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 11th Edn. EGS
Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30
Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measurements: A review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408
Doughty MJ, Laiquzzaman M, Muller A, Oblak E, Button NF (2002) Central corneal thickness in European (white) individuals, especially children and the elderly, and assessment of its possible importance in clinical measures of intra-ocular pressure. Ophthal Physiol Opt 22:491–504
Aakre BM, Doughty MJ, Dalane OV, Berg A, Aamodt O, Gangstad H (2003) Assessment of reproducibility of measures of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in young white adults over a 16-h time period. Ophthal Physiol Opt 23:271–283
Jordan JF, Joergens S, Dinslage S, Dietlein TS, Krieglstein GK (2006) Central and paracentral corneal pachymetry in patients with normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:177–182
Rask G, Behndig A (2006) Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmastism and direction of gaze on Goldmann tonometry readings. Ophthalmic Res 38:49–55
Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763–767
Cairns G, McGhee CNJ (2005) Orbscan computerized topography: Attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:205–220
Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ, Button NF (2007) On the use of Orbscan II to assess the peripheral corneal thickness in humans: a comparison with ultrasound pachometry measures. Ophthal Physiol Opt 27:179–189
Doughty MJ, Blades KA, Ibrahim N (2002) Assessment of the number of eye symptoms, and the impact of some confounding variables, for office staff in non-air-conditioned buildings. Ophthal Physiol Opt 22:143–155
Liu Z, Huang AJ, Pflugfelder SC (1999) Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan central topography system. Br J Ophthalmol 83:774–778
Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ (2007) Regional repeatability measures of corneal thickness: Orbscan II and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 84:52–58
Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF (2005) The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tomometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1572–1575
Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF (2006) Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5337–5347
Cronemberger S, Calixto N, Costa LT, Soares FM (2005) Corneal thickness and the daily curve of intraocular pressure in suspected and glaucomatous patients. Arq Bras Oftalmol 68:185–188
Von Eicken J, Kohlhaas M, Stodmeister R, Höh H (2006) Die Rolle der Pachymetrie in der täglichen Glaukomdiagnostik. Klin Monatsbl Augenheikd 223:117–130
Kawana K, Tokunaga T, Miyata K, Okamoto F, Kiuchi T, Oshika T (2004) Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. Br J Ophthalmol 88:466–468
Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, Banerjee S, Naroo SA, Shah S (2004) Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1272–1277
Huang RYC, Lam AKC, Chan R, Young S-M (2005) Should Orbscan pachomtery be performed before or after Goldmann applanation tonometry ? Ophthal Physiol Opt 25:441–445
Sabetti L, Renzetti A, D’Alessandri L (2000) Possibilita di errore da disidratazione nella pachimetria. Boll D’Oculist 79:221–228
Solomon OD (1999) Corneal indendation during ultrasonic pachometry. Cornea 18:214–215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Neither of the authors has any financial interest in the production or use of any device mentioned in this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doughty, M.J., Jonuscheit, S. Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures—a different result with different pachymeters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 1603–1610 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0601-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0601-x