Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bilateral canaliculitis following SmartPLUG insertion for dry eye syndrome post LASIK surgery

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dry eyes are a common symptom following LASIK corneal refractive surgery. Treatments include topical lubricants to supplement the tear film, and punctal occlusion to reduce tear outflow. Canaliculitis is a recognised complication of punctal plugs, but has not previously been described following insertion of newer generation semi-permanent intra-canalicular plugs, such as the SmartPLUG.

Methods

Case report.

Results

We describe a 60-year-old female who underwent bilateral LASIK surgery leading to aggravation of her dry eye syndrome. She was managed with the insertion of semi-permanent intra-canalicular moldable silicone SmartPLUGs. She subsequently developed bilateral canaliculitis requiring bilateral canaliculotomy.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of bilateral canaliculitis following intra-canalicular SmartPLUG insertion. This case illustrates that punctal occlusion with the newer generation intra-canalicular plugs carries a risk of canaliculitis and that irrigation is not always effective in removing these devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melki SA, Azar DT (2001) LASIK complications: etiology, management, and prevention. Surv Ophthalmol 46:95–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jabbur NS, Sakatani K, O’Brien TP (2004) Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1867–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Brien PD, Collum LM (2004) Dry eye: diagnosis and current treatment strategies. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 4:314–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calonge M (2001) The treatment of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol 45:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murube J, Murube E (1996) Treatment of dry eye by blocking the lacrimal canaliculi. Surv Ophthalmol 40:463–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamano T (2005) Lacrimal duct occlusion for the treatment of dry eye. Semin Ophthalmol 20:71–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rumelt S, Remulla H, Rubin PA (1997) Silicone punctal plug migration resulting in dacryocystitis and canaliculitis. Cornea 16:377–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Takemura M, Yokoi N, Nakamura Y et al (2002) Canaliculitis caused by Actinomyces in a case of dry eye with punctal plug occlusion. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 106:416–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sugita J, Yokoi N, Fullwood NJ et al (2001) The detection of bacteria and bacterial biofilms in punctal plug holes. Cornea 20:362–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. SmartPlug Study Group (2006) Management of complications after insertion of the SmartPlug punctal plug: a study of 28 patients. Ophthalmology (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Michaelides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheepers, M., Pearson, A. & Michaelides, M. Bilateral canaliculitis following SmartPLUG insertion for dry eye syndrome post LASIK surgery. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 895–897 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0462-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0462-8

Keywords

Navigation