Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Amplitude calculation in multifocal ERG: comparison of repeatability in 30 Hz flicker and first order kernel stimulation

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In multifocal flicker stimulation, each step of the M-sequence consists of four consecutive flashes with a frequency of 30 Hz. The resulting amplitudes can be calculated by means of a discrete fourier transformation (DFT). With this method, amplitudes can be calculated without having to localise peaks and troughs and set cursors. The purpose of this study is to compare the re-test stability of this method to conventional mfERG stimulation.

Methods

We examined 27 healthy subjects using a RETI-scan device (Roland Consult, Wiesbaden). We used 61 hexagons within a 30 deg. visual field. We compared the classic first order kernel (FOK) stimulation with the multifocal 30 Hz Flicker (mfFlicker-ERG) stimulation. Repeatability was calculated using coefficients of variation.

Results

Both methods had coefficients of 15% for the sum P1-amplitude and the DFT results, respectively. The amplitudes calculated by flicker and DFT were approximately 25% smaller than the FOK amplitudes.

Conclusions

This study showed no difference of re-test repeatability between the mfFlicker-ERG and the conventional first order kernel method. Since the mfFlicker-ERG method does not require a definition of peaks and troughs in order to calculate the amplitudes, we believe that a common source of error is eradicated, especially when dealing with distorted or atypical curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE (1996) Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A 13:634–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Birch DG, Anderson JL (1992) Standardized full-field electroretinography. Normal values and their variation with age. Arch Ophthalmol 10:1571–1576

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bush RA, Sieving PA (1996) Inner retinal contributions to the primate photopic fast flicker electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 13(3):557–565. Mar

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE (1990) Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 292:497–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hare WA, Ton H (2002) Effects of APB, PDA, and TTX on ERG responses recorded using both multifocal and conventional methods in monkey. Effects of APB, PDA, and TTX on monkey ERG responses. Doc Ophthalmol 105(2):189–222. Sep

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hood DC, Greenstein V, Frishman L, Holopigian K, Viswanathan S, Seiple W, Ahmed J, Robson JG (1999) Identifying inner retinal contributions to the human multifocal ERG. Vision Res 39(13):2285–2291. Jun

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein V (1997) A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs. Vis Neurosci 14:533–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hood DC (2000) Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Retin Eye Res 19(5):607–646. Review. Sep

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobi PC, Miliczek KD, Zrenner E (1993) Experiences with the international standard for clinical electroretinography: normative values for clinical practice, interindividual and intraindividual variations and possible extensions. Doc Ophthalmol 85(2):95–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Tanikawa (1995) Clinical evaluation of multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:2146–2150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parks S, Keating D, Williamson TH, Evans AL, Elliott AT, Jay JL (1996) Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal electroretinograph: a control study. Br J Ophthalmol 80:831–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man–I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32:433–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Velten IM, Horn FK, Korth M (2002) [Multifocal ERG with 30 Hz flicker stimulation in glaucoma patients and normal probands]. Ophthalmologe 99(6):432–437. Jun

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057, Aachen, Germany

    Babac A. E. Mazinani, Thorsten Repas, Andreas W. A. Weinberger, Michael A. Vobig & Peter Walter

Authors
  1. Babac A. E. Mazinani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thorsten Repas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas W. A. Weinberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael A. Vobig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Walter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babac A. E. Mazinani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazinani, B.A.E., Repas, T., Weinberger, A.W.A. et al. Amplitude calculation in multifocal ERG: comparison of repeatability in 30 Hz flicker and first order kernel stimulation. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 338–344 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0423-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0423-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation