Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The future role of wavefront-guided excimer ablation

  • Guest Editorial
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Aizawa D, Shimizu K, Komatsu M et al (2003) Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: 6-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1507–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Awwad ST, El-Kateb M, Bowman RW et al (2004) Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Alcon CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue: three-month results. J Refract Surg 20:S606–S613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bueeler M, Mrochen M, Seiler T (2003) Maximum permissible lateral decentration in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bueeler M, Mrochen M, Seiler T (2004) Maximum permissible torsional misalignment in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bühren J, Kohnen T (2006) Factors affecting the change of lower and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1166–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell CE (2004) Improving visual function diagnostics with the use of higher-order information from metrics. J Refract Surg 20:S495–S503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carones F, Vigo L, Scandola E, Sorace SG (2004) Expanded range CustomCornea algorithms for myopia and astigmatism: one-month results. J Refract Surg 20:S619–S623

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Castanera J, Serra A, Rios C (2004) Wavefront-guided ablation with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix for retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Refract Surg 20:439–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chalita MR, Xu M, Krueger RR (2004) Alcon CustomCornea wavefront-guided retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 20:S624–S630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cosar CB, Saltuk G, Sener AB (2004) Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix system. J Refract Surg 20:35–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Durrie DS, Kezirian GM (2005) Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Durrie DS, Stahl J (2004) Randomized comparison of custom laser in situ keratomileusis with the Alcon CustomCornea and the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix systems: one-month results. J Refract Surg 20:S614–S618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammer T, Duncker GI, Giessler S (2004) Results of wavefront-guided LASIK. Ophthalmologe 101:824–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hammond SD Jr, Puri AK, Ambati BK (2004) Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 15:328–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hersh PS, Fry K, Blaker JW (2003) Spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Clinical results and theoretical models of etiology. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2096–2104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jabbur NS, Kraff C (2005) Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using the WaveScan system for correction of low to moderate myopia with astigmatism: 6-month results in 277 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1493–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanjani N, Jacob S, Agarwal A et al (2004) Wavefront- and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:398–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG (2004) Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:804–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim TI, Yang SJ, Tchah H (2004) Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg 20:432–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koch DD, Kohnen T, Obstbaum SA, Rosen ES (1998) Format for reporting refractive surgical data (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg 24:285–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koh S, Maeda N, Kuroda T et al (2002) Effect of tear film break-up on higher-order aberrations measured with wavefront sensor. Am J Ophthalmol 134:115–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kohnen T (2001) Measuring vision in refractive surgery (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1897–1898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kasper T, Terzi E (2004) Quality of vision after refractive surgery. In: Kohnen T, Koch DD (eds) Cataract and refractive surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kühne C, Mirshahi A (2004) Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology 111:2175–2185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kohnen T, Mahmoud K, Bühren J (2005) Comparison of corneal higher-order aberrations induced by myopic and hyperopic LASIK. Ophthalmology 112:1692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohnen T, Steinkamp GW, Schnitzler EM et al (2001) LASIK with a superior hinge and scanning spot excimer laser ablation for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Results of a prospective study on 100 eyes with a 1-year follow-up. Ophthalmologe 98:1044–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kremer I, Bahar I, Hirsh A, Levinger S (2005) Clinical outcome of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with moderate to high myopia with thin corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1366–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawless MA, Hodge C, Rogers CM, Sutton GL (2003) Laser in situ keratomileusis with Alcon CustomCornea. J Refract Surg 19:S691–S696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang J, Grimm B, Goelz S, Bille JF (1994) Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 11:1949–1957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang J, Williams DR, Miller DT (1997) Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 14:2884–2892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin DY, Manche EE (2004) Custom-contoured ablation pattern method for the treatment of decentered laser ablations. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1675–1684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, Kohnen T (2003) In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2295–2301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T (2000) Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg 16:116–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T (2001) Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:201–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J (1988) Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 14:46–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Netto MV, Wilson SE (2004) Corneal wound healing relevance to wavefront guided laser treatments. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ninomiya S, Fujikado T, Kuroda T et al (2002) Changes of ocular aberration with accommodation. Am J Ophthalmol 134:924–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nuijts RM, Nabar VA, Hament WJ, Eggink FA (2002) Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1907–1913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pallikaris I, Kymionis G, Panagopoulou S et al (2002) Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1737–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ et al (1990) Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med 10:463–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pansell T, Schworm H, Ygge J (2003) Torsional and vertical eye movements during head tilt dynamic characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2986–2990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Phusitphoykai N, Tungsiripat T, Siriboonkoom J, Vongthongsri A (2003) Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Refract Surg 19:S217–S220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Porter J, MacRae S, Yoon G et al (2003) Separate effects of the microkeratome incision and laser ablation on the eye’s wave aberration. Am J Ophthalmol 136:327–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Porter J, Yoon G, Lozano D et al (2006) Aberrations induced in wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery due to shifts between natural and dilated pupil center locations. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:21–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Porter J, Yoon G, MacRae S et al (2005) Surgeon offsets and dynamic eye movements in laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2058–2066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roberts C (2000) The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg 16:407–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts C (2000) Future challenges to aberration-free ablative procedures. J Refract Surg 16:S623–S629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Roberts C (2002) Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 18:S589–S592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roberts C (2005) Biomechanical customization: the next generation of laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Seiler T, McDonnell PJ (1995) Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 40:89–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Smolek MK, Klyce SD (2005) Goodness-of-prediction of Zernike polynomial fitting to corneal surfaces. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2350–2355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z et al (2005) Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Williams D, Yoon GY, Porter J et al (2000) Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye. J Refract Surg 16:S554–S559

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang Y, Thompson K, Burns S (2002) Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2508–2512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yoon G, MacRae S, Williams DR, Cox IG (2005) Causes of spherical aberration induced by laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zadok D, Carrillo C, Missiroli F et al (2004) The effect of corneal flap on optical aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol 138:190–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kohnen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohnen, T., Kühne, C. & Bühren, J. The future role of wavefront-guided excimer ablation. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 189–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0422-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0422-3

Navigation