Abstract
Background
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has become an increasingly popular alternative to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with stromal corneal pathologies. The main advantages of DALK are: prevention of long-term endothelial loss, elimination of allograft reaction and short topical steroid treatment with lower risks of glaucoma, cataract and infection. Because this technique enables surgeons to use corneal grafts with low endothelial density, the aim of this paper was to determine whether this type of innovation has had a significant impact on eye bank activity.
Methods
We reviewed our corneal graft activity over a 40-month period and assessed the proportion of deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. During the same period, we also evaluated our eye bank activity and recorded the utilisation of grafts with endothelium abnormalities, which were only suitable for lamellar techniques.
Results
Deep lamellar keratoplasty represented 29.8% (85 out of 285) of corneal transplantations. Forty-eight percent of all corneas stored at the local eye bank were unsuitable for penetrating keratoplasty; 36.6% of those were not suitable for endothelial deficiencies. Among these, 72.7% were used for DALK and 27.3% were rejected. This permitted a 24.5% increase in corneal grafting activity. In contrast, Descemet’s membrane was removed at the time of surgery in 12% of corneas with healthy endothelium, which was used for deep lamellar keratoplasty.
Conclusions
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty development and close collaboration between eye banks and surgeons can induce a significant increase in corneal grafting. This could be a partial solution in countries confronted with corneal graft shortages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Yousuf N, Mavrikakis I, Mavrikakis E, Daya SM (2004) Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period. Br J Ophthalmol 88:998–1001
Amayem AF, Anwar M (2000) Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 107:76–79
Anwar M, Teichmann KD (2002) Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:398–403
Anwar M, Teichmann KD (2002) Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet’s membrane. Cornea 21:374–383
Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Sosa JA, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR (2002) Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: identifying opportunities for intervention. Transplantation 73:1683–1691
Caporossi A, Simi C, Licignano R, Traversi C, Balestrazzi A (2004) Air-guided manual deep lamellar keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol 14:55–58
Coombes AG, Kirwan JF, Rostron CK (2001) Deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue in the management of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 85:788–791
Dobbins KR, Price FW Jr, Whitson WE (2000) Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea 19:813–816
European Eye Bank Association (2005) European Eye Bank Association directory, 13th edn. European Eye Bank Assocation
French Eye Bank Association (2003) French Eye Bank Association directory, 11th edn. French Eye Bank Association
Gain P, Thuret G, Loup Pugniet J, Rizzi P, Acquart S, Le Petit JC, Maugery J (2002) Obtaining cornea donation consent by telephone. Transplantation 73:926–929
Higaki S, Maeda N, Watanabe H, Kiritoshi A, Inoue Y, Shimomura Y (1999) Double anterior chamber deep lamellar keratoplasty: case report. Cornea 18:240–242
Hirano K, Sugita J, Kobayashi M (2002) Separation of corneal stroma and Descemet’s membrane during deep lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 21:196–199
Jendrisak MD, Hruska K, Wagner J, Chandler D, Kappel D (2002) Cadaveric-donor organ recovery at a hospital-independent facility. Transplantation 74:978–982
Krieglstein TR, Welge-Lussen UC, Priglinger S, Kampik A, Priemer F, Neubauer AS (2002) Consenting to cornea donation: influencing factors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:816–821
Legeais JM, Parc C, d’Hermies F, Pouliquen Y, Renard G (2001) Nineteen years of penetrating keratoplasty in the Hotel-Dieu Hospital in Paris. Cornea 20:603–606
Maeno A, Naor J, Lee HM, Hunter WS, Rootman DS (2000) Three decades of corneal transplantation: indications and patient characteristics. Cornea 19:7–11
Mamalis N, Anderson CW, Kreisler KR, Lundergan MK, Olson RJ (1992) Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1409–1411
Manche EE, Holland GN, Maloney RK (1999) Deep lamellar keratoplasty using viscoelastic dissection. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1561–1565
Melles GR, Lander F, Rietveld FJ, Remeijer L, Beekhuis WH, Binder PS (1999) A new surgical technique for deep stromal, anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 83:327–333
Melles GR, Remeijer L, Geerards AJ, Beekhuis WH (2000) A quick surgical technique for deep, anterior lamellar keratoplasty using visco-dissection. Cornea 19:427–432
Muraine M (2002) Logistical problems have a tendency to hinder cornea procurement. Transplantation 73:839–840
Muraine M, Collet A, Brasseur G (2001) Deep lamellar keratoplasty as surgical management of anterior and posterior segment injuries to the eye. Cornea 20:897–901
Panda A, Bageshwar LM, Ray M, Singh JP, Kumar A (1999) Deep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesions. Cornea 18:172–175
Patel NP, Kim T, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR (2000) Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, 1989–1995. Ophthalmology 107:719–724
Ploeg RJ, Niesing J, Sieber-Rasch MH, Willems L, Kranenburg K, Geertsma A (2003) Shortage of donation despite an adequate number of donors: a professional attitude? Transplantation 76:948–955
Poinard C, Tuppin P, Loty B, Delbosc B (2003) The French national waiting list for keratoplasty created in 1999: patient registration, indications, characteristics, and turnover. J Fr Ophthalmol 26:911–919
Randleman JB, Song CD, Palay DA (2003) Indications for and outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty performed by resident surgeons. Am J Ophthalmol 136:68–75
Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, Tsubota K (2002) Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 134:159–165
Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Omoto M, Teruya A, Ishioka M, Tsubota K (2005) Deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLKP) in keratoconus patients using viscoadaptive viscoelastics. Cornea 24:178–181
Sugita J, Kondo J (1997) Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement. Br J Ophthalmol 81:184–188
Thuret G, Manissolle C, Acquart S, Le Petit JC, Maugery J, Campos-Guyotat L, Doughty MJ, Gain P (2003) Is manual counting of corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks still acceptable? The French experience. Br J Ophthalmol 87:1481–1486
Tsubota K, Kaido M, Monden Y, Satake Y, Bissen-Miyajima H, Shimazaki J (1998) A new surgical technique for deep lamellar keratoplasty with single running suture adjustment. Am J Ophthalmol 126:1–8
Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, Bunce C, Craig E (2004) Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 111:1676–1682
Yahalom C, Mechoulam H, Solomon A, Raiskup FD, Peer J, Frucht-Pery J (2005) Forty years of changing indications in penetrating keratoplasty in Israel. Cornea 24:256–258
Acknowledgements
English translation and proofreading by Philip Rousseau-Cunningham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper obtained the Best Presentation Award from the XVII EEBA Awards Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muraine, M., Toubeau, D., Gueudry, J. et al. Impact of new lamellar techniques of keratoplasty on eye bank activity. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245, 32–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0390-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0390-7