Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reduction associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) is known to develop only when more than 25% of retinal ganglion cells are ablated in monkeys’ eyes. However, there was no prior study to estimate biometrically the degree of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness reduction leading to the development of RAPD in live human eyes. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between the amount of RNFL thickness reduction and the depth of a clinically detectable RAPD in patients with unilateral optic atrophy.

Methods

Enrolled were 20 patients with optic atrophy of various etiologies. We quantified RAPD by performing the swinging flashlight test with log-scaled neutral density filters placed over the unaffected eye. Average RNFL thickness was measured by OCT3000 with the average RNFL thickness program. Linear regression analysis was used in assessing the relationship between RAPD and the ratio of affected to unaffected average RNFL thickness.

Results

The mean of average RNFL thickness was 95.6±17.3 μm in the unaffected eyes and 50.7±19.3 μm in the affected eyes (P<0.001). Regression analysis between RAPD and the ratio of affected to unaffected average RNFL thickness revealed a correlation coefficient R2=0.48 (P=0.0007). The regression line intersected the y-axis at 0.77.

Conclusions

RAPD was not clinically detected until at least approximately 25% of the retinal nerve fibers were lost when compared with the unaffected eyes. Substantial retinal ganglion cell damage is required for the development of RAPD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujimoto JG, Hee MR, Huang D, Schuman JS, Puliafito CA, Swansom MS (2003) Principles of optical coherence tomography. In: Schuman JS, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG (eds) Optical coherence tomography of ocular diseases, 2nd edn. Slack, Thorofare, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178–1181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang JM, Kim C, Kim JY (2004) Relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with asymmetric cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J (2004) Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 137:156–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson LN, Hill RA, Bartholomew MJ (1988) Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 95:1649–1655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF, Seya R, Maeda H, Negi A (2003) Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 135:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Matsui N, Nagai A, Nakanishi Y, Kusuhara S, Yamada Y, Negi A (2004) Optical coherence tomography detects characteristic retinal nerve fiber layer thickness corresponding to band atrophy of the optic discs. Ophthalmology 111:2278–2283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thomson HS (1993) The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 115:351–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerrison JB, Buchanan K, Rosenberg ML, Clark R, Andreason K, Alfaro DV, Grossniklaus HE, Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Kerrigan DF, Miller NR, Quigley HA (2001) Quantification of optic nerve axon loss associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect in the monkey. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1333–1341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagreze WDA, Kardon RH (1998) Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:401–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam BL, Thompson HS (1990) A unilateral cataract produces a relative afferent pupillary defect in the contralateral eye. Ophthalmology 97:334–338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levin PS, Newman SA, Quigley HA, Miller NR (1983) A clinicopathologic study of optic neuropathies associated with intracranial mass lesions with quantification of remaining axons. Am J Ophthalmol 95:295–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quigley HA, Miller NR, Green WR (1985) The pattern of optic nerve fiber loss in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 100:769–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatsumi Y, Kanamori A, Kusuhara A, Nakanishi Y, Kusuhara S, Nakamura M (2005) Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optic tract syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol 49:294–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA (1981) How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 26:39–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, Corbett JJ (1982) The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 93:681–688

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Nakamura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakanishi, Y., Nakamura, M., Tatsumi, Y. et al. Quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reduction associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 1480–1484 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0327-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0327-1

Keywords

Navigation