Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG)

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of unsteady fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) measurement in normal subjects.

Methods

The mfERGs of 20 subjects with normal vision (mean age=23.5 years) were recorded with different levels of voluntary eye movements made to mimic unsteady fixation. Subjects were required to move their fixation regularly every 2 s between the center and the ends of a fixation cross, so that 51.2% of the time fixation was at the center and 12.2% of the time it was at each end of the fixation cross. Four different conditions were performed: central fixation (without voluntary eye movements) and with 2°, 4° and 6° magnitude of unsteady fixation. First-order kernel mfERG findings are presented.

Results

Analysis of the ring responses indicated that the central mfERG amplitude was most affected by unsteady fixation. There was significantly reduced amplitude for 4° unsteady fixation and as expected, this reduction became larger with 6° unstable fixation. However, there was no significant effect on the center hexagon amplitude for 2° unsteady fixation. The amplitudes of the ring-2 responses were only affected in the 6° unsteady fixation condition. No significant change in implicit time was found for any level of unsteady fixation.

Conclusion

These results suggest that mfERG amplitude is not substantially affected if fixation is maintained within the central stimulus hexagon. We conclude that, for patients with poor fixation, the accuracy of mfERG results may be difficult to interpret and the use of a fixation-monitoring system is desirable for ideal measurement. The depth of depression at the blind spot area may be another useful parameter to interpret the accuracy of mfERG results in patients with poor fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan HH, Brown B (2000) Pilot study of the multifocal electroretinogram in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 84:1147–1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan HL, Brown B (1998) Investigation of retinitis pigmentosa using the multifocal electroretinogram. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18:335–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan HL, Brown B (1999) Multifocal ERG changes in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:306–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chisholm JA, Keating D, Parks S, Evans AL (2001) The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 102:131–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu HW, Chan HL, Brown B (2006) Glaucoma detection is facilitated by luminance modulation of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:929–937

    Google Scholar 

  6. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE (1990) Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 292:497–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Felius J, Hood DC, Swanson WH (1997) Photopic temporal processing in patients with retinitis pigmentosa studied with the multi-focal ERG and psychophysical techniques. Vision science and its applications, 1997 OSA Technical Digest Series, vol 1, Washington, D.C. Optical Society of America 1:276–279

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felius J, Swanson WH (1999) Photopic temporal processing in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2932–2944

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fortune B, Bearse MA Jr, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA (2002) Selective loss of an oscillatory component from temporal retinal multifocal ERG responses in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2638–2647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasegawa S, Takagi M, Usui T, Takada R, Abe H (2000) Waveform changes of the first-order multifocal electroretinogram in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1597–1603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Ruprecht KW (2001) Comparison of different high resolution multifocal electroretinogram recordings in patients with age-related maculopathy. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:556–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S (2002) Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1673–1685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hood DC, Holopigian K, Greenstein V, Seiple W, Li J, Sutter EE, Carr RE (1997) A comparison of visual field loss to multi-focal ERG changes in patients with RP. Vision science and its applications, 1997 OSA Technical Digest Series, vol 1, Washington, D.C. Optical Society of America 1:272–275

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hood DC, Holopigian K, Greenstein V, Seiple W, Li J, Sutter EE, Carr RE (1998) Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique. Vision Res 38:163–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hood DC, Li J (1997) A technique for measuring individual multifocal ERG records. In: Yager D (ed) Non-invasive assessment of the visual system. Trends in optics and photonics, vol 11, Washington, D.C. Optical Society of America 11:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hood DC, Odel JG, Chen CS, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neuroophthalmol 23:225–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang S, Wu D, Jiang F, Ma J, Wu L, Liang J, Luo G (2000) The multifocal electroretinogram in age-related maculopathies. Doc Ophthalmol 101:115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang F, Huang S, Luo G, Wu D, Liang J, Liu C (2001) The measurement of multifocal electroretinography. Yan Ke Xue Bao 17:217–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jurklies B, Weismann M, Husing J, Sutter EE, Bornfeld N (2002) Monitoring retinal function in neovascular maculopathy using multifocal electroretinography—early and long-term correlation with clinical findings. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:244–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Keating D, Parks S, Evans A (2000) Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 100:77–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Tanikawa A (1995) Clinical evaluation of multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:2146–2150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Tso MO, Lam TT (2001) Reduced amplitude and delayed latency in foveal response of multifocal electroretinogram in early age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 85:287–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Menz M, Sutter E (2004) The effect of fixation instability on the multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 109:147–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Ruprecht KW (2002) Multifocal electroretinogram with a multiflash stimulation technique in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res 34:83–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Palmowski AM, Sutter EE, Bearse MA Jr, Fung W (1999) Multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG) in diagnosis of macular changes. Example: senile macular degeneration. Ophthalmologe 96:166–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Poloschek CM, Rupp V, Krastel H, Holz FG (2003) Multifocal ERG recording with simultaneous fundus monitoring using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Eye 17:159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rudolph G, Kalpadakis P, Bechmann M, Haritoglou C, Kampik A (2003) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope-evoked multifocal ERG (SLO-mfERG) in patients with macular holes and normal individuals. Eye 17:801–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sasoh M, Yoshida S, Kuze M, Uji Y (1998) The multifocal electroretinogram in retinal detachment. Doc Ophthalmol 94:239–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schuchard RA, Naseer S, de Castro K (1999) Characteristics of AMD patients with low vision receiving visual rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 36:294–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Seeliger M, Kretschmann U, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Ruther K, Zrenner E (1998) Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 125:214–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Seeliger MW, Kretschmann UH, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E (1998) Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:718–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32:433–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vrabec TR, Affel EL, Gaughan JP, Foroozan R, Tennant MT, Klancnik JM Jr, Jordan CS, Savino PJ (2004) Voluntary suppression of the multifocal electroretinogram. Ophthalmology 111:169–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Associated Fund (Research Postgraduate) from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the Competitive Earmark Research Grant (PolyU 5384/04M) from The Research Grants Committee of the Hong Kong SAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry H. L. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chu, P.H.W., Chan, H.H.L. & Leat, S.J. Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 1273–1282 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0304-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0304-8

Keywords

Navigation