Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical results of topical fluconazole for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Fungal keratitis is a rare but serious condition that may result in loss of vision. The potentially poor prognosis might be due to a delay in diagnosis and/or to limited treatment options. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with topical fluconazole 0.2% for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis.

Methods

Retrospective case series. A chart review of all patients evaluated at the Ophthalmology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas in Paraguay from January 1997 to December 2000 identified 25 cases of fungal keratitis. Among these cases, one patient discontinued the treatment and another received amphotericin as the first line drug, resulting in 23 cases available for data analysis. Twelve patients were treated with topical fluconazole 0.2% alone (Group I) and 11 patients received a combination of topical fluconazole 0.2% and oral ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily (Group II).

Results

Sixteen of 23 cases showed resolution of the keratitis, 9/12 (75%) in Group I and 7/11 (64%) in Group II. Seven patients (30%) did not respond to medical treatment and required a surgical procedure to preserve eye integrity. Superficial and small ulcers have a significantly better prognosis than do lrge and deep ulcers. Concomitant oral ketoconazole (400 mg/day) did not improve the clinical results.

Conclusions

Our findings of study suggest that topical fluconazole 0.2% is a safe and effective antifungal drug for the management of filamentous mycotic keratitis, particularly in cases that are not severe. The addition of oral ketoconazole to topical fluconazole did not improve the clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfonso E, Rosa R (1998) Fungal keratitis. In: Krachmer J et al (ed) Text horns and color atlas (on CD-ROM). Mosby, St Louis

  2. Behrens-Baumann W (1997) Zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Pilzkeratitis. Eine Übersicht. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 210:a10–a13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chander J, Sharma A (1994) Prevalence of fungal corneal ulcers in northern India. Infection 22(3):207–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Erie JC, Nevitt MP, Hodge DO, Ballard DJ (1993) Incidence of ulcerative keratitis in a defined population from 1950 through 1988. Arch Ophthalmol 111:1665–1671

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Forster RK, Rebell G (1975) The diagnosis and management of keratomycosis. II. Medical and surgical management. Arch Ophthalmol 93:1134–1136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Freda R, Colombo TO, Acnes P, Freitas D (1998) Eficácia do fluconazol subconjuntival na ceratite experimental por Fusarium solani. Arq Bras Oftalmol 61(5):579–584

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzales CA, Srinivasan M, Whitcher JP, Smolin G (1996) Incidence of corneal ulceration in Madurai district, South India. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 3(3):159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones DB, Forster FK, Rebell G (1972) Fusarium solani keratitis treated with natamycin (pimaricin): eighteen consecutive cases. Arch Ophthalmol 88:147–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laspina F, Samudio M, Cibils D et al (2004) Epidemiological characteristics of microbiological results on patients with infectious corneal ulcers: a 13-year survey in Paraguay. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:204–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liesegang T (1999) Fungal keratitis. In: Kaufman HE, Barron B, McDonald M (eds) The horns (2nd ed. on CD-ROM). Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liesegang TJ, Forster RK (1980) Spectrum of microbial keratitis in South Florida. Am J Ophthalmol 90:38–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maia M, Yuso Fujii G, Mioshi C et al (1997) Ceratite fúngica: Aspectos etiológicos, epidemiológicos e diagnósticos. Arq Bras Oftalmol 60(4):354

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miño de Kaspar H, Zoulek G, Paredes ME et al (1991) Mycotic keratitis in Paraguay. Mycoses 34:251–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Day DM, Robinson R, Head WS (1983) Efficacy of antifungal agents in the cornea. I. A comparative study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:1098–1102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Day DM, Ray WA, Head WS, Robinson RD (1984) Influence of the corneal epithelium on the efficacy of topical antifungal agents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:855–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Day D, Head WS, Robinson RD, Clanton JA (1986) Corneal penetration of topical amphotericin B and natamycin. Curr Eye Res 5:877–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poole T, Hunter D, Maliwa E, Ramsay A (2002) Aetiology of microbial keratitis in northern Tanzania. Br J Ophthalmol 86:941–942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwab I, Epstein R, Harris D, Pflugfelder S, Wilhelums K, Perry P (eds) (1997) Fungal keratitis. In: Basic and clinical science course, external disease and horns. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, 1997, pp 125–126

  19. Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C et al (1997) Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India. Br J Ophthalmol 81:965–971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanure MA, Cohen EJ, Sudesh S, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR (2000) Spectrum of fungal keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cornea 19:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas P (2003) Current perspective on ophthalmic mycoses. Clin Microbiol Rev 16(4):730–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Urbak SF, Degn T (1994) Fluconazole in the management of fungal ocular infections. Ophthalmologica 208:147–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vemuganti GK, Garg P, Gopinathan U et al (2002) Evaluation of agent and host factors in progression of mycotic keratitis: a histologic and microbiologic study of 167 corneal buttons. Ophthalmology 109:1538–1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson THE, Ajello L (1998) Agents of oculomycoses: fungal infections of the eye. In: Topley & Wilson’s microbiology and microbial infections, 9th edn. Arnold, London, pp 525–567

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xie L, Dong X, Shi W (2001) Treatment of fungal keratitis by penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1070–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Georg and Hannelore Zimmermann Foundation, Munich, Germany and the Department of Ophthalmology at the Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany for financial and technical support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Sonego-Krone.

Additional information

None of the authors has any financial interest in the materials used on this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonego-Krone, S., Sanchez-Di Martino, D., Ayala-Lugo, R. et al. Clinical results of topical fluconazole for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 782–787 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-1127-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-1127-8

Keywords

Navigation