Skip to main content
Log in

The course of epiphora after failure of silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

One of the indications for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is failure of silicone intubation. We evaluated the course of epiphora after failure of silicone intubation for CNLDO when DCR was not performed.

Methods

In a comparative cohort study carried out at a tertiary referral center, ten eyes of seven consecutive children who had failure of silicone intubation manifested as persistent epiphora over 2 months and whose parents refused DCR were followed up for an average of 50.4 months (range 33–70 months). Three lacrimal drainage systems of three other children who had failure of silicone intubation underwent uneventful DCR.

Results

In eight (80%) of the ten consecutive eyes with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (six of the seven children, 86%), there was spontaneous complete resolution of the epiphora and normal dye disappearance test (DDT) at the end of the follow-up period. One child with Down’s syndrome, allergic rhinitis, asthma and multiple site obstructions had improvement of symptoms but abnormal DDT. The epiphora in all three children who underwent DCR had disappeared by 6 months after surgery when the silicone tube was removed. No complications were noted during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Epiphora can spontaneously resolve after failure of silicone intubation in CNLDO, and DCR should no longer considered be compulsory in such cases unless complications evolve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal RK, Misson GP, Donaldson I, Willshaw HE (1993) The role of nasolacrimal intubation in the management of childhood epiphora. Eye 7:760–762

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JD (1985) Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct system obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 22:34–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dortzbach RK, France TD, Kushner BJ, Gonnering RS (1982) Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. Am J Ophthalmol 94:585–590

    Google Scholar 

  4. El-Mansoury J, Calhoun JH, Nelson LB, Harley RD (1986) Results of late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 93:1052–1054

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gunton KB, Chung CW, Schnall BM et al (2001) Comparison of balloon dacryocystoplasty to probing as a primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J AAPOS 5:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hakin KN, Sullivan TJ, Sharma A, Welham RAN (1994) Pediatric dacryocystorhinostomy. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 22:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katowitz JA, Welsh MG (1997) Timing of initial probing and irrigation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 94:698–705

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leone CR, Van Gemert JV (1989) The success rate of the silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Surg 5:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacCwen GJ, Young JDH (1991) Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye 5:596–600

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maini R, MacEwen CJ, Young JDH (1998) The natural history of epiphora in childhood. Eye 12:669–671

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mannor GE, Frimpong-Ansah K, Ezra E (1999) Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 127:616–617

    Google Scholar 

  12. Migliori ME, Putterman AM (1988) Silicone intubation for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: successful results removing the tubes after six weeks. Ophthalmology 95:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  13. Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC (1990) Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 177:687–690

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Donnell BA, Adenis JP, Linberg JV, Rose GE, Sullivan TJ, Wobig JL (2001) The failed probing. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 29:276–280

    Google Scholar 

  15. Older J (1988) Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. In: Linberg J (ed) Lacrimal surgery. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paul TO (1985) Medical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 22:68–70

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robb RM (1998) Success rates of nasolacrimal duct probing at intervals after 1 year of age. Ophthalmology 105:1307–1310

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robb RM (2001) Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 14:443–446

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stager D, Baker JD, Frey T et al (1992) Office probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Surg 23:482–484

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tan AD, Rubin PAD, Sutula FC, Remulla HD (2001) Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int Ophthalmol Clin 41:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner RS (2001) Management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Pediatr Ann 30:481–488

    Google Scholar 

  22. Welham RAN, Henderson RH (1973) Results of dacryocystorhinostomy analysis of cases for failure. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 93:601–609

    Google Scholar 

  23. Welham RAN, Hughes SM (1985) Lacrimal surgery in children. Am J Ophthalmol 99:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  24. Welsh MG, Katowitz JA (1989) Timing of silastic tubing removal after intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstr Surg 5:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wesley RE (1985) Inferior turbinate fracture in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and congenital nasolacrimal duct anomaly. Ophthalmic Surg 16:368–371

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zappia RJ, Milder B (1972) Lacrimal drainage function. 2. The fluorescence dye disappearance test. Am J Ophthalmol 74:160–162

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zwaan J (1997) Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction before and after the age of 1 year. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 28:932–936

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any of the products mentioned in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kassif, Y., Rehany, U., David, M. et al. The course of epiphora after failure of silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 758–762 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1115-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1115-4

Keywords

Navigation