Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the recordings of scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) of the retina and the recordings of color Doppler imaging (CDI) of the retrobulbar circulatory parameters in diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy.
Methods
Twenty-three diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy were evaluated using SLDF for the apparent retinal circulation and using CDI for the apparent retrobulbar circulation in the central retinal artery, the central retinal vein and the short posterior ciliary artery. The circulatory parameters estimated in the retinal tissue using SLDF were velocity, volume and flow. The Circulatory parameters that were recorded using the CDI method were peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), mean velocity (MV), pulsatility (PI) and resistivity index (RI). We obtained the correlation coefficients between parameters of SLDF and CDI. Multiple regression analysis was performed with “flow” parameter of SLDF recordings as a dependent variable and all estimated CDI parameters as independent variables. Multiple linear regression was also performed, including the “flow” parameter of SLDF recordings as a dependent variable and PI of the CDI parameters of all the measured blood vessels as independent variables.
Results
The “velocity” parameter of SLDF was significantly correlated with the PI in the central retinal artery (P=0.02), PI and RI in the central retinal vein (P=0.01; P=0.01) and the PSV, MV, PI and RI in the short posterior ciliary artery, as recorded by CDI (P=0.003; P=0.02; P=0.002; P=0.01). The “volume” parameter of SLDF was significantly correlated with the PI and RI in the central retinal vein (P=0.03; P=0.03) and the PSV in the short posterior ciliary artery (P=0.03), as recorded by CDI. The “flow” parameter of SLDF was significantly correlated with the PI and RI in the central retinal vein (P=0.01; P=0.01) and the PSV, MV, PI and RI in the short posterior ciliary artery (P=0.003; P=0.03; P=0.002; P=0.01) as measured by CDI. The multiple regression analysis was statistically non-significant (P=0.86). The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that from among the PI of the evaluated blood vessels, the PI of the short posterior ciliary artery was the most significant predictor of the “flow” parameter of SLDF (P=0.01).
Conclusion
This study suggests a positive correlation between the recordings of SLDF of the retinal tissue and the retrobulbar circulatory parameters of the CDI in diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bohdanecka Z, Orgul S, Meyer AB, Prunte C, Flammer J (1999) Relationship between blood flow velocities in retrobulbar vessels and laser Doppler flowmetry at the optic disk in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmologica 213(3):145–149
Cuypers MHM, Kasanardjo JS, Polak BCP (2000) Retinal blood flow changes in diabetic retinopathy measured with the Heidelberg scanning laser Doppler flowmeter. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:935–941
Dimitrova G, Kato S, Tamaki Y et al. (2001) Choroidal circulation in diabetic patients. Eye 15:602–607
Dimitrova G, Tamaki Y, Kato S (2002) Retrobulbar circulation in patients with age-related maculopathy. Eye 16:580–586
Dimitrova G, Kato S, Yamashita H, et al (2003) Relation between retrobulbar circulation and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 87:622–625
Friedman E, Krupsky S, Lane AM et al. (1995) Ocular blood flow velocity in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 102:640–646
Goebel W, Lieb WE, Ho A (1995) Color Doppler imaging: a new technique to assess orbital blood flow in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:860–870
Grunwald JE, Brucker AJ, Braunstein SN et al. (1994) Strict metabolic control and retinal blood flow in diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol 78:598–604
Guthoff RF, Berger RW, Winkler P, Helmke K, Chumbley LC (1991) Doppler ultrasonography of the ophthalmic and central retinal vessels. Arch Ophthalmol 109:532–536
Harris A, Harris M, Biller J et al. (2000) Aging affects the retrobulbar circulation differently in women and men. Arch Ophthalmol 118:1076–1080
Hedges TR, Baron EM, Hedges TR, Sinclair SH (1994) The retinal venous pulse—its relation to optic disc characteristics and choroidal pulse. Ophthalmology 101:542–547
Hellstedt, R Kaaja, K Teramo, H Immonen (1996) Macular blood flow during pregnancy in patients with early DR measured by blue-light entoptic simulation. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234:659–663
Levine DN (1998) Spontaneous pulsation of the retinal veins. Microvasc Res 56:154–165
Kagemann L, Harris A, Chung HS, Evans D, Buck S, Martin B (1998) Heidelberg retinal flowmetry: factors affecting blood flow measurement. Br J Opthalmol 82:131–136
Kawagishi T, Nishizawa Y, Emoto M (1995) Impaired retinal artery blood flow in IDDM patients before clinical manifestation of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 18:1544–1549
Keiser HJ, Schotzau A, Flammer J (1996) Blood flow velocities in the extraocular vessels in normal volunteers. Am J Ophthalmol 122:364–370
Kiss B, Polska E, Dorner G et al. (2002) Retinal blood flow during hyperoxia revisited: concerted results using different measurement techniques. Microvasc Res 64:75–85
Kohner EM (1993) The retinal blood flow in diabetes. Diabetes Metab (Paris) 19:401–404
Michaelson G, Langhans MJ, Groh MJM (1995) Clinical investigation of the combination of a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and laser Doppler flowmeter. Ger J Ophthalmol 4:342–349
Michelson G, Langhans MJ, Groh MJM (1996) Perfusion of the juxtapapillary retina and the neuroretinal rim area in primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 5(2):91–98
Michelson G, Harazny J (1997) Relationship between ocular pulse pressures and retinal vessel velocities. Ophthalmology 104:664–671
Niwa Y, Yamamoto T, Kawakami H, Kitazawa Y (1998) Reproducibility of color Doppler imaging for orbital arteries in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 42:389–392
Polska E, Kircher K, Ehrlich P, Vecsei PV, Schmetterer L (2001) RI in central retinal artery as assessed by CDI does not correspond to retinal vascular resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280:H1442–H1447
Polska E, Luksch A, Ehrlich P, Sieder A, Schmetterer L (2002) Measurements in the peripheral retina using LDF and laser interferometry are mainly influenced by the choroidal circulation. Curr Eye Res 24(4):318–323
Remsch H, Spraul CW, Lang GK, Lang GE (2000) Changes of retinal capillary blood flow in age-related maculopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:960–964
Schmetterer L, Salomon A, Rheinberger A, Unfried C, Lexer F, Wolzt M (1996) Fundus pulsation measurements in diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:283–287
Snell RS, Lemp MA (1998) Clinical anatomy of the eye, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden, USA
Sullivan P, Cioffi GA, Wang L et al. (1999) The influence of ocular pulsatility on scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Am J Ophthalmol 128:81–87
Tsang AC, Harris A, Kagemann L et al. (1999) Brightness alters HRF measurements in an in vitro model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:795–799
Wolf S, Arend O, Toonen H, Bertram B, Jung F, Reim M (1991) Retinal capillary blood flow measurement with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 98:996–1000
Williamson TH, Baxter GM (1994) Central retinal vein occlusion, an investigation by color Doppler imaging. Ophthalmology 101:1362–1372
Zinser G (1999) Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry—principle and technique. In: Pillunat LE, Harris A, Anderson DR, Greve EL (eds) Current concepts on ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Kugler Publications, The Hague, Netherlands, pp 197–204
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by the Japanese Ministry for Science and Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dimitrova, G., Tomita, G. & Kato, S. Correlation between capillary blood flow of retina estimated by SLDF and circulatory parameters of retrobulbar blood vessels estimated by CDI in diabetic patients. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 653–658 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1070-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1070-0