Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Angiographic findings in arteriovenous dissection (sheathotomy) for decompression of branch retinal vein occlusion

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Arteriovenous dissection (sheathotomy) is a new therapeutic option in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and macular involvement. We present an angiographic follow-up of 22 patients who underwent arteriovenous dissection (AVD).

Methods

Twenty-two patients (15 women; mean age 68.7±8.0 years) were examined preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after AVD. For assessment of retinal hemodynamics, arteriovenous passage time (AVP) of the affected and unaffected branches at first (AVPe) and at maximal (AVPmax) venous filling were measured. Changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were calculated to determine foveal structural changes. Visual acuity was assessed as functional parameter.

Results

The early AVP (AVPe) of the affected branch increased from 4.4±0.8 s preoperatively to 4.9±0.6 s 6 weeks after surgery and decreased to 2.7±0.4 s 1 year after surgery (p=0.05). When compared to the unaffected control branch, AVPe was significantly increased in the affected branch preoperatively (4.5±0.8 s versus 1.5±0.2 s, p<0.01), 6 weeks (4.9±0.6 s versus 2.1±0.3 s, p<0.01), 3 months (2.7±0.4 s versus 1.5±0.2 s, p<0.01), and 6 months (3.1±0.4 s versus 2.2±0.3 s, p=0.02) after AVD. After 1 year, AVPe no longer differed between the affected and the control branch (2.7±0.4 s versus 2.6± 0.3 s). AVPmax was significantly increased in the affected branch preoperatively (11.8±0.8 s versus 7.7±1.0 s, p<0.05). The AVPmax in the affected branch with the exception of 3 months after surgery (10.2±1.1 s, p<0.01) was no longer elevated when compared to preoperative values. The area of the FAZ did not change significantly but showed a trend for enlargement.

Conclusion

AVD for decompression of BRVO leads to a significant decrease of AVP and may ameliorate retinal perfusion in the affected branch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arend O, Wolf S, Remky A, Sponsel WE, Harris A, Bertram B, Reim M (1994) Perifoveal microcirculation with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232(4):225–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cahill MT, Fekrat S (2002) Arteriovenous sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 15(4):417–423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charbonnel J, Glacet-Bernard A, Korobelnik JF, Nyouma-Moune E, Pournaras CJ, Colin J, Coscas G, Soubrane G (2004) Management of branch retinal vein occlusion with vitrectomy and arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy, the possible role of surgical posterior vitreous detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242(3):223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen HC, Wiek J, Gupta A, Luckie A, Kohner EM (1998) Effect of isovolaemic haemodilution on visual outcome in branch retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 82(2):162–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dotrelova D, Dubska Z, Kuthan P, Stepankova J (2001) Initial experience with surgical decompression of the vein in branch retinal vein occlusion [Czech]. Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie 57(6):359–366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duker JS, Brown GC (1989) Anterior location of the crossing artery in branch retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 107:998–1000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Figueroa MS, Torres R, Alvarez MT (2004) Comparative study of vitrectomy with and without vein decompression for branch retinal vein occlusion: a pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol 14(1):40–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frangieh GT, Green R, Barraquer-Somers E, Finkelstein D (1982) Histopathologic study of nine branch retinal vein occlusions. Arch Ophthalmol 100:1132–1140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujii GY, de Juan E Jr, Humayun MS (2003) Improvements after sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion documented by optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 34(1):49–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujio N, Feke GT, Ogasawara H, Goger DG, Yoshida A, McMeel JW (1994) Quantitative circularory measurements in branch retinal vessel occlusion. Eye 8:324–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabel VP, Birngruber R, Nasemann J (1988) Fluorescein angiography with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). Lasers Light Ophthalmol 2(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Green WR, Chan CC, Hutchins GM, Terry JM (1981) Central retinal vein occlusion: a prospective histopathologic study of 29 eyes in 28 cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 79:371–421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen LL, Danisevskis P, Arntz HR, Hövener G, Wiederholt MA (1985) Randomised prospective study on treatment of central retinal vein occlusion by isovolaemic haemodilution and photocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol 69:108–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen LL, Wiek J, Arntz R (1988) Randomisierte Studie zur Wirkung der isovolämischen Hämodilution bei retinalen Venenastverschlüssen. Fortschr Ophthalmol 85:514–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayreh SS (1994) Retinal vein occlusion. Indian J Ophthalmol 42(3):109–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang G, Lee J (1995) Retinal circulation times in branch retinal vein occlusion. Korean J Ophthalmol 9(2):107–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar B, Yu DY, Morgan WH, Barry CJ, Constable IJ, McAllister IL (1998) The distribution of angioarchitectural changes within the vicinity of the arteriovenous crossing in branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 105(3):424–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Le Rouic JF, Bejjani RA, Rumen F, Caudron C, Bettembourg O, Renard G, Chauvaud D (2001) Adventitial sheathotomy for decompression of recent onset branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239(10):747–751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu L, Li Y, Yi C, Li M, Lu X, Zhang J (2003) Preliminary clinical observation of arteriovenous sheathotomy for treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion. Yan Ke Xue Bao 19(1):33–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason J, Swanner J, Feist RM, White M, McGwin G Jr, Emond T (2002) Arteriovenous sheathotomy to surgically decompress branch retinal vein occlusion: a matched control study, in ARVO. Edited by IOVS. Fort Lauderdale

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mester U, Dillinger P (2002) Vitrectomy with arteriovenous decompression and internal limiting membrane dissection in branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina 22(6):740–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Myers J, Akduman L (2002) Sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion, in ARVO. Edited by IOVS. Fort Lauderdale

  23. Opremcak EM, Bruce RA (1999) Surgical decompression of branch retinal vein occlusion via arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy: a prospective review of 15 cases. Retina 19(1):1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saika S, Tanaka T, Miyamoto T, Ohnishi Y (2001) Surgical posterior vitreous detachment combined with gas/air tamponade for treating macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion: retinal tomography and visual outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239(10):729–732

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah GK (2000) Adventitial sheathotomy for treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11(3):171–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah GK, Sharma S, Fineman MS, Federman J, Brown MM, Brown GC (2000) Arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 129(1):104–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Staurenghi G, Lonati C, Aschero M, Orzalesi N (1994) Arteriovenous crossing as a risk factor in branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 117:211–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf S, Bertram B, Reim M (1987) Measurement of retinal blood flow parameters in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wolf S, Arend O, Bertram B, Schulte K, Teping C, Reim M (1989) Hemodilution therapy in central retinal vein occlusion: a randomized placebo controlled study. Clin Hemorheology 9(6)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wolf S, Toonen H, Koyama T, Meyer-Ebrecht D, Reim M (1990) Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for the quantification of retinal blood-flow parameters: a new imaging technique. Quintessenz, München

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yamaji H, Shiraga F, Tsuchida Y, Yamamoto Y, Ohtsuki H (2004) Evaluation of arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion by fluorescein videoangiography and image analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 137(5):834–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kube.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kube, T., Feltgen, N., Pache, M. et al. Angiographic findings in arteriovenous dissection (sheathotomy) for decompression of branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 334–338 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0983-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0983-y

Keywords

Navigation