Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A recently developed digital tonometer for transpalpebral intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, distributed by Corneal, Inc., allows the noninvasive measurement of IOP for screening purposes.

Method

We measured the IOP of 218 eyes in 109 patients of the Interdisciplinary Uveitis Center of the University of Heidelberg with intact corneal epithelium. IOPs were measured first with the TGDc-01 tonometer, and then by means of Goldmann tonometry. IOPs were recorded by two independent examiners. The mean of three measurements obtained with the TGDc-01 was taken, whereas only one measurement was performed with the Goldmann tonometer.

Results

The mean difference between the TGDc-01 and Goldmann measurements was 3.7 mmHg. The standard deviation of the differences was ±4.06 mmHg. Thus measurements acquired with the TGDc-01 may range 4.4 mmHg above or 11.8 mmHg below the values given by Goldmann tonometry.

Conclusion

The IOP values obtained with the TGDc-01 were in poor agreement with Goldmann tonometry. We found a higher variation as well as a bias towards lower IOP values with the TGDc-01. It is a question of clinical judgement as to how far these deviating measurements can be accepted for screening purposes. Because the IOPs obtained with the TGDc-01 are generally lower and less accurate than those obtained with the Goldmann tonometer we believe that the TGDc-01 is not a reliable tool for IOP measurement in clinical routine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Digital mobile tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure through the eyelid: TGDc-01 “PRA”. Instruction booklet, Rjazan State Toolmaking Plant, 32 Kaljaeva Street, 390000 Rjazan, Russia

  3. Draeger J, Stodtmeister R (2003) Ein “neues” Tonometer? Augenarzt 37:318–319

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J (2000) Comparing methods of clinical measurements: reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg 90:593–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin M, Pache M, Flammer J (2003) Der portable Tonometer TGDc-01 und die Goldmann- und Lufttonometrie im Vergleich - eine Pilotstudie. In: Auffarth GU, Welt R, Demeler U (eds) Transactions, 17th Congress of the German Society for Intraocular Lens Implantation and Refractive Surgery (DGII). Biermann, Cologne, pp 126–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette Lösch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lösch, A., Scheuerle, A., Rupp, V. et al. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 313–316 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0971-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0971-2

Keywords

Navigation