Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) carry a risk of hemorrhage. We aim to identify factors associated with subsequent hemorrhages.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted across the ScienceDirect, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Assessed risk factors included bAVM size, bAVM volume, hemorrhage and seizure presentations, presence of deep venous drainage, deep-seated bAVMs, associated aneurysms, and Spetzler–Martin grade. Subgroup analyses were conducted on prior treatments, hemorrhage presentation, AVM size, and type of management.

Results

The meta-analysis included 8 cohort studies and 2 trials, with 4,240 participants. Initial hemorrhage presentation (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.94–2.98; p < 0.001), any deep venous drainage (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.09–2.13; p = 0.01), and associated aneurysms (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.41–2.23; p < 0.001) increased secondary hemorrhage risk. Conversely, higher Spetzler–Martin grades (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.68–0.87; p < 0.001) and larger malformation volumes (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76–0.99; p = 0.04) reduced risk. Subgroups showed any deep venous drainage in patients without prior treatment (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25–2.15; p < 0.001), bAVM > 3 cm (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.15–2.78; p = 0.01), and multimodal interventions (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.12–2.53; p = 0.01) increased risk. The reverse effect was found for patients initially presented without hemorrhage (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67–0.93; p = 0.01). Deep bAVM was a risk factor in > 3 cm cases (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.61–4.59; p < 0.001) and multimodal management (HR 2.77; 95% CI 1.66–4.56; p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed increased hemorrhage risk for initial hemorrhage presentation, while cumulative survival was higher in intervened patients over 72 months.

Conclusion

Significant risk factors for bAVMs hemorrhage include initial hemorrhage, any deep venous drainage, and associated aneurysms. Deep venous drainage involvement is a risk factor in cases without prior treatment, those with bAVM > 3 cm, and cases managed with multimodal interventions. Deep bAVM involvement also emerges as a risk factor in cases > 3 cm and those managed with multimodal approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Abbreviations

ARUBA:

A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

bAVM:

Brain arteriovenous malformation

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

HRs:

Hazard ratios

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NOS:

Newcastle–Ottawa scale

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

REML:

Restricted maximum likelihood

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SIVMS:

Steering Committee and the Oxford Vascular Study

References

  1. Ozpinar A, Mendez G, Abla AA (2017) Epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, and prognostic classifications of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Handb Clin Neurol 143:5–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawton MT, Rutledge WC, Kim H, Stapf C, Whitehead KJ, Li DY et al (2015) Brain arteriovenous malformations. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:15008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaligram SS, Winkler E, Cooke D, Su H (2019) Risk factors for hemorrhage of brain arteriovenous malformation. CNS Neurosci Ther 25(10):1085–1095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Da Costa L, Wallace MC, Ter Brugge KG, O’Kelly C, Willinsky RA, Tymianski M (2009) The natural history and predictive features of hemorrhage from brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 40(1):100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuurbier SM, Al-Shahi SR (2019) Interventions for treating brain arteriovenous malformations in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9(9):CD003436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollock BE, Link MJ, Brown RD (2013) The risk of stroke or clinical impairment after stereotactic radiosurgery for ARUBA-eligible patients. Stroke 44(2):437–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C, Moquete E, Moy CS, Overbey JR et al (2014) Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): A multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. The Lancet 383(9917):614–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ding D, Yen CP, Xu Z, Starke RM, Sheehan JP (2013) Radiosurgery for patients with unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations: Clinical article. J Neurosurg 118(5):958–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halim AX, Johnston SC, Singh V, McCulloch CE, Bennett JP, Achrol AS et al (2004) Longitudinal risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with arteriovenous malformation of the brain within a defined population. Stroke 35(7):1697–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim H, Sidney S, McCulloch CE, Poon KYT, Singh V, Johnston SC et al (2007) Racial/ethnic differences in longitudinal risk of intracranial hemorrhage in brain arteriovenous malformation patients. Stroke 38(9):2430–2437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nerva JD, Barber J, Levitt MR, Rockhill JK, Hallam DK, Ghodke BV et al (2018) Onyx embolization prior to stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: a single-center treatment algorithm. J Neurointerv Surg 10(3):258–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Shahi Salman R, White PM, Counsell CE, Du PJ, Van Beijnum J, Josephson CB et al (2014) Outcome after conservative management or intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. JAMA 311(16):1661–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Shahi R, Bhattacharya JJ, Currie DG, Papanastassiou V, Ritchie V, Roberts RC et al (2003) Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS): evaluation of methods, ICD-10 coding, and potential sources of bias in a prospective, population-based cohort. Stroke 34(5):1156–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stapf C, Mast H, Sciacca RR, Choi JH, Khaw AV, Connolly ES, et al (2006) Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation [Internet]. Vol. 66, Neurology. www.neurology.org

  15. Thenier-Villa JL, Galárraga-Campoverde RA, Martínez Rolán RM, De La Lama Zaragoza AR, Martínez Cueto P, Muñoz Garzón V et al (2017) Linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery of central nervous system arteriovenous malformations: a 15-year analysis of outcome-related factors in a single tertiary center. World Neurosurg 1(103):291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamada S, Takagi Y, Nozaki K, Kikuta KI, Hashimoto N (2007) Risk factors for subsequent hemorrhage in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 107(5):965–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sterne J, Harbord R (2004) Funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata J 1(4):127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lv X, Hu X, Liu J, He H, Li Y (2016) The influence of age and the initial clinical presentations of patients with an arteriovenous malformation on the risk of hemorrhage. Neurol India 64(Suppl):S87-94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ogilvy CS, Stieg PE, Awad I, Brown J, Kondziolka D, Rosenwasser R et al (2001) Recommendations for the management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council. American Stroke Association Circulation 103(21):2644–2657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim H, Al-Shahi Salman R, McCulloch CE, Stapf C, Young WL (2014) Untreated brain arteriovenous malformation: patient-level meta-analysis of hemorrhage predictors. Neurology 83(7):590–597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tong X, Wu J, Lin F, Cao Y, Zhao Y, Wang S et al (2016) Risk factors for subsequent hemorrhage in patients with cerebellar arteriovenous malformations. World Neurosurg [Internet] 92:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin TM, Yang HC, Lee CC, Wu HM, Hu YS, Luo CB et al (2019) Stasis index from hemodynamic analysis using quantitative DSA correlates with hemorrhage of supratentorial arteriovenous malformation: a cross-sectional study. J Neurosurg 132(5):1574–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Y, Chen P, Li R, Han H, Li Z, Ma L et al (2023) Rupture-related quantitative hemodynamics of the supratentorial arteriovenous malformation nidus. J Neurosurg 138(3):740–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu H, Liu L, Chang Y, Song Y, Liang S, Ma C et al (2023) Quantitative evaluation of the subsequent hemorrhage with arteriography-derived hemodynamic features in patients with untreated cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Front Neurol 14:1174245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gross BA, Du R (2013) Natural history of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 118(2):437–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Platz J, Berkefeld J, Singer OC, Wolff R, Seifert V, Konczalla J et al (2014) Frequency, risk of hemorrhage and treatment considerations for cerebral arteriovenous malformations with associated aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(11):2025–2034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Aliberti G, Talamonti G, Cenzato M, La Camera A, Debernardi A, Valvassori L et al (2015) Arterial and venous aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformations. World Neurosurg 83(2):188–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryu B, Ishikawa T, Kawamata T (2017) Multimodal Treatment Strategy for Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations of the Brain. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 57(2):73–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Padilla-Vazquez F, Zenteno MA, Balderrama J, Escobar-de la Garma VH, Juan DS, Trenado C (2017) A proposed classification for assessing rupture risk in patients with intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Surg Neurol Int 8:303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tasic G, Jovanovic V, Djurovic B, Nikolic I, Janicijevic M, Samardzic M et al (2011) Natural course of the arteriovenous malformations of the brain initially presented by hemorrhage: analysis of a clinical series of 39 patients. Turk Neurosurg 21(3):280–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Subat YW, Dasenbrock HH, Gross BA, Patel NJ, Frerichs KU, Du R, et al (2020) Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage after embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg JNS [Internet] 133(5):1417–27. https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/133/5/article-p1417.xml

  32. Feghali J, Huang J (2019) Updates in arteriovenous malformation management: the post-Aruba Era. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 5:34–39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also acknowledge the contribution of the Department of Neurology, Universitas Udayana for the supports given.

Funding

The authors did not receive any grant or funding for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BGdL: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, wrote the first draft, study supervision. AAIKA: analysis and interpretation of data, wrote the first draft. CPK: wrote the first draft. NAKP: critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content. KT: critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content. IPEW: study concept and design, critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content. ISP: critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content. BGdL is the guarantor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Putu Eka Widyadharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 227 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Liyis, B.G., Arini, A.A.I.K., Karuniamaya, C.P. et al. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 271, 2274–2284 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12235-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12235-1

Keywords

Navigation