Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of endovascular treatment for in-hospital stroke vs. community-onset stroke: a propensity score-matched analysis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of endovascular treatment for in-hospital stroke remains debatable. We aimed to compare the outcomes between patients with in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke who received endovascular treatment.

Methods

This prospective registry-based cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment from January 2013 to December 2022 and were registered in the Selection Criteria in Endovascular Thrombectomy and Thrombolytic Therapy study and Yonsei Stroke Cohort. Functional outcomes at day 90, radiological outcomes, and safety outcomes were compared between the in-hospital and community-onset groups using logistic regression and propensity score-matched analysis.

Results

Of 1,219 patients who underwent endovascular treatment, 117 (9.6%) had in-hospital stroke. Patients with in-hospital onset were more likely to have a pre-stroke disability and active cancer than those with community-onset. The interval from the last known well to puncture was shorter in the in-hospital group than in the community-onset group (155 vs. 355 min, p<0.001). No significant differences in successful recanalization or safety outcomes were observed between the groups; however, the in-hospital group exhibited worse functional outcomes and higher mortality at day 90 than the community-onset group (all p<0.05). After propensity score matching including baseline characteristics, functional outcomes after endovascular treatment did not differ between the groups (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 0.78–1.83, p=0.4). Safety outcomes did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Endovascular treatment is a safe and effective treatment for eligible patients with in-hospital stroke. Our results will help physicians in making decisions when planning treatment and counseling caregivers or patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The supporting data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Cumbler E (2015) In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke. Neurohospitalist 5:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941874415588319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Saltman AP, Silver FL, Fang J et al (2015) Care and Outcomes of Patients With In-Hospital Stroke. JAMA Neurol 72:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al (2016) Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 387:1723–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00163-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S et al (2018) Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging. N Engl J Med 378:708–718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC et al (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. N Engl J Med 378:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Akbik F, Xu H, Xian Y et al (2020) Trends in Reperfusion Therapy for In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke in the Endovascular Therapy Era. JAMA Neurol 77:1486–1495. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu MY, Chen CH, Yeh SJ et al (2019) Comparison between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy. PLoS One 14:e0214883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulwa Z, Del Brutto VJ, Loggini A et al (2020) Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients with In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke: A Case-Control Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 29:104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monch S, Lehm M, Maegerlein C et al (2018) Worse endovascular mechanical recanalization results for patients with in-hospital onset acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol 265:2525–2530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9035-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nam HS, Kim YD, Yoo J et al (2021) Comorbidity index for predicting mortality at 6 months after reperfusion therapy. Sci Rep 11:5963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85390-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee BI, Nam HS, Heo JH et al (2001) Yonsei Stroke Registry. Analysis of 1,000 patients with acute cerebral infarctions. Cerebrovasc Dis 12:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park H, Kim YD, Nam HS et al (2022) Impact of Renal Function on Short-Term Outcome After Reperfusion Therapy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 53:3622–3632. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C et al (1995) Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 274:1017–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu K, Zu QQ, Zhao LB et al (2022) Outcomes between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke after thrombectomy: Propensity-score matching analysis. Interv Neuroradiol 28:296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199211030769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Almutairi S, Choudhury H, Najm M et al (2021) Workflow and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for In-Hospital Stroke a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 30:105937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim M, Yang PS, Yu HT et al (2021) Changes in Cardiovascular Health Status and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Older Adults. Yonsei Med J 62:298–305. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.4.298

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee MJ, Chung JW, Ahn MJ et al (2017) Hypercoagulability and Mortality of Patients with Stroke and Active Cancer: The OASIS-CANCER Study. J Stroke 19:77–87. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2016.00570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Navi BB, Kasner SE, Elkind MSV et al (2021) Cancer and Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. Stroke 52:1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.120.032002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dardiotis E, Aloizou AM, Markoula S et al (2019) Cancer-associated stroke: Pathophysiology, detection and management (Review). Int J Oncol 54:779–796. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Han KT, Kim DW, Kim W (2022) Impact of Cardiovascular Diseases on Mortality in Gastric Cancer Patients with Preexisting Chronic Disease. Yonsei Med J 63:1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.0273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoo J, Nam HS, Kim YD et al (2019) Short-Term Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Patients With Systemic Malignancy. Stroke 50:507–511. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sano T, Kobayashi K, Ichikawa T et al (2020) In-hospital Ischemic Stroke Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy. J Neuroendovasc Ther 14:133–140. https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsubara N, Hiramatsu R, Yagi R et al (2019) Characteristics and Treatment Results of In-hospital Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy. J Neuroendovasc Ther 13:281–287. https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2018-0134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heo JH, Kim YD, Nam HS et al (2010) A computerized in-hospital alert system for thrombolysis in acute stroke. Stroke 41:1978–1983. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.583591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Campos Carvalho, Martins E, de Melo Luiz, Bernardi F, Maia Junior OT et al (2020) Similarities and Differences Between Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Mechanical Thrombectomy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13:1683–1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aarnio K, Haapaniemi E, Melkas S et al (2014) Long-term mortality after first-ever and recurrent stroke in young adults. Stroke 45:2670–2676. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.005648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meinel T, Lerch C, Fischer U et al (2022) Multivariable Prediction Model for Futile Recanalization Therapies in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Neurology 99:e1009-1018. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a faculty research grant from the Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2022-0170) and grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (RS-2023-00265497).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

JWJ, KHK, JY, HSN, JHH, and YDK performed data analysis. JWJ, HSN, JHH, MB, JY, JK, HP, S-IS, J-HH, BMK, DJK, JNH, OYB, W-KS, J-WC, K-YL, YHJ, HSL, SHA, DHS, H-YC, H-JC, J-HB, GSK, K-DS, SHK, T-JS, SWH, JHP, JKC, and YDK obtained local data. JWJ, HSL, and YDK wrote the first draft of the manuscript or prepared the figures. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Dae Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System (approval no.: 4-2023-0896).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from prospectively enrolled patients included in the SECRET or Yonsei Stroke Cohort studies or their families, and the institutional review boards of the participating hospitals approved both studies.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 737 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, J.W., Kim, K.H., Yun, J. et al. Effectiveness of endovascular treatment for in-hospital stroke vs. community-onset stroke: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Neurol 271, 2684–2693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12232-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12232-4

Keywords

Navigation