Abstract
Purpose
Cognitive behavioural therapies (CBTs) are a standard of care for treatment of many ‘hidden symptoms’ in people with MS (PwMS), such as stress, depression, and fatigue. However, these interventions can vary widely in formatting and may not be tailored for PwMS. To optimize CBTs for MS, understanding the experiences of PwMS and clinicians is essential. This systematic review and meta-aggregation synthesizes existing qualitative data on stakeholder perspectives of CBTs for PwMS.
Methods
Systematic searches across five major electronic databases were conducted. Studies reporting qualitative data were identified. Two reviewers performed screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and certainty of evidence assessments. Meta-aggregation was performed as per the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, entailing qualitative data extraction, developing categories, and synthesizing overall findings.
Results
Twenty-eight studies were included in this review, comprising data from 653 PwMS and 47 clinicians. In the meta-aggregation, 122 qualitative results were extracted and grouped into nine categories. Categories were then combined into six synthesized findings: (1) setting the context–life with MS, (2) reasons for participating in CBTs, (3) acceptability of and experiences with participating in CBTs, (4) perceived benefits of CBTs, (5) perceived challenges with CBTs, and (6) suggestions to improve CBTs for PwMS.
Conclusions
A range of benefits including psychological, social, and lifestyle improvements were reported, but varied based on the design of the CBT intervention. Future CBT interventions should be tailored to participant needs, delivered in group settings, offer online options, and be delivered by a trained facilitator familiar with MS. Further exploration of the ideal CBT design for PwMS, as well as engagement with caregivers and clinicians treating MS, is warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Multiple Sclerosis International Federation [MSIF] (2020) Atlas of MS, 3rd edition
Buhse M (2015) The elderly person with multiple sclerosis: clinical implications for the increasing life-span. J Neurosci Nurs 47:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000172
Hanna M, Strober LB (2020) Anxiety and depression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): antecedents, consequences, and differential impact on well-being and quality of life. Multi Scler Relat Disord 44:102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102261
Oliva Ramirez A, Keenan A, Kalau O, Worthington E, Cohen L, Singh S (2021) Prevalence and burden of multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a systematic literature review. BMC Neurol 21:468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02396-1
Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J (2008) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 7:1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X
Boeschoten RE, Braamse AMJ, Beekman ATF, Cuijpers P, Van Oppen P, Dekker J et al (2017) Prevalence of depression and anxiety in Multiple Sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 372:331–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.067
Rieckmann P, Centonze D, Elovaara I, Giovannoni G, Havrdová E, Kesselring J et al (2018) Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: a combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group. Multi Scler Relat Disord 19:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.013
Parker L-S, Topcu G, De Boos D, Das NR (2021) The notion of “invisibility” in people’s experiences of the symptoms of multiple sclerosis: a systematic meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil 43:3276–3290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1741698
Fernández-Álvarez H, Fernández-Álvarez J (2019) Commentary: Why cognitive behavioral therapy is the current gold standard of psychotherapy. Front Psychiatry 10:123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00123
Fenn K, Byrne M (2013) The key principles of cognitive behavioural therapy. InnovAiT 6:579–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755738012471029
Kahl KG, Winter L, Schweiger U (2012) The third wave of cognitive behavioural therapies: what is new and what is effective? Curr Opin Psychiatry 25:522–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328358e531
Zarotti N, Eccles F, Broyd A, Longinotti C, Mobley A, Simpson J (2023) Third wave cognitive behavioural therapies for people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 45:1720–1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2069292
Patti F (2010) Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: the importance of treatment adherence. PPA. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S8230
Bruce JM, Hancock LM, Arnett P, Lynch S (2010) Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: association with emotional status, personality, and cognition. J Behav Med 33:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9247-y
Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K (2015) Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc 13:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
Hannes K, Lockwood C (2011) Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs 67:1632–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05636.x
Minden SL, Feinstein A, Kalb RC, Miller D, Mohr DC, Patten SB et al (2014) Evidence-based guideline: assessment and management of psychiatric disorders in individuals with MS: report of the guideline development subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 82:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000013
Bramer WM, Giustini D, De Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T (2016) De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. Jmla. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.24
Lockwood C, Porritt K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M et al (2020) Chapter 2: systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. JBI Manual Evid Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-03
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J (2012) Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 10:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Bogosian A, Hughes A, Norton S, Silber E, Moss-Morris R (2016) Potential treatment mechanisms in a mindfulness-based intervention for people with progressive multiple sclerosis. Br J Health Psychol 21:859–880
Dunne J, Chih HJ, Begley A, Daly A, Gerlach R, Schütze R et al (2021) A randomised controlled trial to test the feasibility of online mindfulness programs for people with multiple sclerosis. Multi Scler Relat Disord 48:102728
Fortune J, Norris M, Stennett A, Kilbride C, Lavelle G, Hendrie W et al (2020) ‘I can do this’: a qualitative exploration of acceptability and experiences of a physical activity behaviour change intervention in people with multiple sclerosis in the UK. BMJ Open 10:e029831
Giovannetti AM, Quintas R, Tramacere I, Giordano A, Confalonieri P, Messmer Uccelli M et al (2020) A resilience group training program for people with multiple sclerosis: results of a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial and nested qualitative study. PLoS One 15:e0231380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231380
Hersche R, Weise A, Michel G, Kesselring J, Della Bella S, Barbero M et al (2019) Three-week inpatient energy management education (IEME) for persons with multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: feasibility of a randomized clinical trial. Multi Scler Relat Disord 35:26–33
Holmes JM, Ford E, Yuill F, Drummond AE, Lincoln NB (2012) Attendance at a psychological support group for people with multiple sclerosis and low mood. Disabil Rehabil 34:1323–1327
Learmonth YC, Kinnett-Hopkins D, Motl RW (2019) Capitalising on the opinions of persons with multiple sclerosis to inform the main trial–participant opinions from participation in a feasibility study, a qualitative extension study. Disabil Rehabil 41:3071–3078
Meek C, Moghaddam NG, Evangelou N, Oates LL, Topcu G, Allen C et al (2021) Acceptance-based telephone support around the time of transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a feasibility randomised controlled trial. J Contextual Behav Sci 21:158–170
Moss-Morris R, McCrone P, Yardley L, van Kessel K, Wills G, Dennison L (2012) A pilot randomised controlled trial of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (MS Invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue. Behav Res Ther 50:415–421
Proctor BJ, Moghaddam NG, Evangelou N, das Nair R (2018) Telephone-supported acceptance and commitment bibliotherapy for people with multiple sclerosis and psychological distress: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Context Behav Sci 9:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.07.006
Ryan JM, Fortune J, Stennett A, Kilbride C, Lavelle G, Hendrie W et al (2020) Safety, feasibility, acceptability and effects of a behaviour-change intervention to change physical activity behaviour among people with multiple sclerosis: results from the iStep-MS randomised controlled trial. Mult Scler 26:1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458519886231
Borghi M, Bonino S, Graziano F, Calandri E (2018) Exploring change in a group-based psychological intervention for multiple sclerosis patients. Disabil Rehabil 40:1671–1678
Dennison L, Moss-Morris R, Yardley L, Kirby S, Chalder T (2013) Change and processes of change within interventions to promote adjustment to multiple sclerosis: learning from patient experiences. Psychol Health 28:973–992
Giovannetti AM, Solari A, Pakenham KI (2022) Effectiveness of a group resilience intervention for people with multiple sclerosis delivered via frontline services. Disabil Rehabil 44:6582–6592
Giovannetti AM, Messmer Uccelli M, Solari A, Pakenham KI (2022) Evaluation of a program for training psychologists in an acceptance and commitment therapy resilience intervention for people with multiple sclerosis: a single-arm longitudinal design with a nested qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 44:6926–6938. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2025926
Harrison AM, McCracken LM, Jones K, Norton S, Moss-Morris R (2017) Using mixed methods case-series evaluation in the development of a guided self-management hybrid CBT and ACT intervention for multiple sclerosis pain. Disabil Rehabil 39:1785–1798
Pakenham KI, Mawdsley M, Brown FL, Burton NW (2018) Pilot evaluation of a resilience training program for people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol 63:29–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000167
Pöttgen J, Lau S, Penner I, Heesen C, Moritz S (2015) Managing Neuropsychological Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care 17:130–137. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-015
Shevil E, Finlayson M (2009) Process evaluation of a self-management cognitive program for persons with multiple sclerosis. Patient Educ Couns 76:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.007
Thomas S, Thomas PW, Nock A, Slingsby V, Galvin K, Baker R et al (2010) Development and preliminary evaluation of a cognitive behavioural approach to fatigue management in people with multiple sclerosis. Patient Educ Couns 78:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.001
Thomas S, Pulman A, Dogan H, Jiang N, Passmore D, Pretty K et al (2021) Creating a digital toolkit to reduce fatigue and promote quality of life in multiple sclerosis: participatory design and usability study. JMIR Form Res 5:e19230. https://doi.org/10.2196/19230
Hind D, O’Cathain A, Cooper CL, Parry GD, Isaac CL, Rose A et al (2010) The acceptability of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of depression in people with chronic physical disease: a qualitative study of people with multiple sclerosis. Psychol Health 25:699–712
Gottberg K, Chruzander C, Backenroth G, Johansson S, Ahlström G, Ytterberg C (2016) Individual face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy in multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. J Clin Psychol 72:651–662
Russell N, Gallagher S, Msetfi RM, Hayes S, Motl RW, Coote S (2022) Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis participating in a social cognitive behavior change physical activity intervention. Physiother Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2022.2030828
Wendebourg MJ, Feddersen LK, Lau S, Köpke S, Moss-Morris R, Heesen C et al (2016) Development and feasibility of an evidence-based patient education program for managing fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care 18:129–137. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-105
Ytterberg C, Chruzander C, Backenroth G, Kierkegaard M, Ahlström G, Gottberg K (2017) A qualitative study of cognitive behavioural therapy in multiple sclerosis: experiences of psychotherapists. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 12:1325673. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2017.1325673
Brown CL, Colbeck M, Fogarty D, Funk S (2016) Learning to live with multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment and how it influences readiness for group cognitive intervention. Disabil Health J 9:638–645
Babbage DR, van Kessel K, Drown J, Thomas S, Sezier A, Thomas P et al (2019) MS Energize: field trial of an app for self-management of fatigue for people with multiple sclerosis. Internet Interv 18:100291
Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1444. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
Wampold BE (2015) How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry 14:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238
Kohlmann T, Wang C, Lipinski J, Hadker N, Caffrey E, Epstein M et al (2013) The impact of a patient support program for multiple sclerosis on patient satisfaction and subjective health status. J Neurosci Nurs 45:E3-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0b013e31828a4161
Palcu P, Munce S, Jaglal SB, Allin S, Chishtie JA, Silverstein A et al (2020) Understanding patient experiences and challenges to osteoporosis care delivered virtually by telemedicine: a mixed methods study. Osteoporos Int 31:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05182-5
Fragkiadaki E, Anagnostopoulos F, Triliva S (2023) The experience of psychological therapies for people with multiple sclerosis: a mixed-methods study towards a patient-centred approach to exploring processes of change. Couns Psychother Res 23:690–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12615
Morris-Bankole H, Ho Aileen K (2023) Psychotherapy and professional psychological support in multiple sclerosis: Uncovering patients’ patterns of access and preferences. Multi Scler Relat Disord 71:104562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2023.104562
Hossain SN, Jaglal SB, Shepherd J, Perrier L, Tomasone JR, Sweet SN et al (2021) Web-based peer support interventions for adults living with chronic conditions: scoping review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 8:e14321. https://doi.org/10.2196/14321
Simpson R, Simpson S, Wasilewski M, Mercer S, Lawrence M (2022) Mindfulness-based interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-aggregation of qualitative research studies. Disabil Rehabil 44:6179–6193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1964622
Karnoe A, Kayser L, Skovgaard L (2019) Identification of factors that motivate people with multiple sclerosis to participate in digital data collection in research: sequential mixed methods study. JMIR Hum Factors 6:e13295. https://doi.org/10.2196/13295
Pinto C, Geraghty AWA, McLoughlin C, Pagnini F, Yardley L, Dennison L (2023) Experiences of psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Health Psychol Rev 17:416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2073901
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: all authors. Data acquisition: SP, GF, RS. Data analysis and interpretation: GF, SP, AS, SM, RS. Manuscript writing: GF, SP, SM, RS. Manuscript revision: all authors. All authors have approved the final article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, G., Posa, S., Sureshkumar, A. et al. Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis and clinicians in using cognitive behavioural therapies for hidden symptoms: a systematic review and meta-aggregation. J Neurol 271, 1084–1107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12116-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12116-z