Abstract
Cases of monkeypox (MPV) are sharply rising around the world. While most efforts are being focused on the management of the first symptoms of monkeypox, such as cutaneous lesions and flu-like symptoms, the effect of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) on multiple organs still remains unclear. Recently, several neurological manifestations, such as headache, myalgia, malaise, fatigue, altered consciousness, agitation, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting, have been reported in patients with MPV. In addition, data from experimental studies have indicated that MPXV can gain access to the central nervous system (CNS) through the olfactory epithelium and infected circulatory monocytes/macrophages as two probable neuroinvasive mechanisms. Therefore, there are growing concerns about the long-term effect of MPXV on the CNS and subsequent neurological complications. This paper highlights the importance of the neuroinvasive potential of MPXV, coupled with neurological manifestations.
Introduction
Monkeypox virus (MPXV), a double-helix DNA virus, causes zoonotic monkeypox disease that belongs to the family of Poxviridae, a subfamily of Chordopoxvirinae and Orthopoxvirus genera [1, 2]. This genu induces cutaneous manifestation in diseases, such as smallpox (caused by variola virus), cowpox (caused by cowpox virus), camelpox (caused by camelpox virus), and monkeypox in humans [3, 4]. The most common symptoms of monkeypox infection in humans are fever, swollen lymph nodes, exhaustion, chills, back pain, and skin rashes [5, 6]. Furthermore, some neurological complications, such as headache, malaise, myalgia, anorexia, and altered consciousness have been sporadically reported in MPXV patients [7,8,9]. These neurological manifestations may be related to the invasive potential of MPXV to the brain tissue that has been elucidated in some infected animals [10,11,12]. There are very few studies in the literature addressing the neuroinvasive potential of MPVX. It is thus crucial to have a mechanistic view on this topic based on the current evidence. Therefore, we highlighted the range of neurological complications associated with MPXV infection in humans. Furthermore, we determined some possible neuroinvasive properties of MPXV from experimental data.
A brief history of geographical aspects of the monkeypox virus
The MPX was named for the first time when the virus was discovered in monkeys at the State Serum Institute of Copenhagen in 1958 [13]. In August 1970, the first human case of MPX infection was identified in a 9-year-old boy that was admitted with fever to Basankusu Hospital in the Democratic Republic of Congo [14]. Wild animals including primates (mangabey monkeys), Gambian pouched rats, and squirrels are considered as the main reservoirs for MPXV [15]. Direct contact with infected animals' body fluids, touch, bite, scratch, hunting, and cooking are major transmission ways of MPXV from animal to human [16, 17]. Up to now, two clades of MPXV were phylogenetically identified. One strain originated from Central Africa–Congo Basin [strain Zaire-96 (ZAI-96)] that is more virulent than other strains derived from Western Africa (SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61) [18, 19]. Between 1970 and 1986 about 404 new cases of MPX had been reported in Central Africa and Western African countries, especially in tropical rainforest areas like Zaire, where cases had direct contact with infected animals [20]. The first outbreak of MPXV in a country outside of Africa was reported in the Midwestern United States in 2003 [9, 21, 22]. In this outbreak, the reservoirs were changed from monkeys and squirrels to prairie dogs which are native animals of the United States (Fig. 1). The source of MPXV in the prairie dogs was imported infected Gambian pouched rats from Ghana into the United States [10, 23]. During the next outbreak, the first case of MPX was confirmed on May 7, 2022, in a British person who travelled to Nigeria and then returned to the United Kingdom [24]. As of 22 June 2022, 3413 confirmed cases of MPX have been reported from 50 countries. From 17 to 22 June, about 1310 new confirmed cases have been added. The United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, and Portugal with totally of 793, 521, 520, and 317 cases, respectively, had more confirmed cases of MPX worldwide until 22 June 2022 [25].
Schematic overview of initiation, spreading, and distribution of MPXV. MPXV appears mainly in tropical rainforest areas of Central and Western Africa where MPXV reservoirs, such as monkeys, squirrels, and other rodents have a habit. Prairie dogs have been recognized as the main animal reservoirs for transmitting MPV to human during the 2003 outbreak in the U.S.A. Recently, the first confirmed case of MPX was identified in a British person who travelled to Nigeria and returned to the United Kingdom (UK). MPXV: Monkeypox virus; WHO: World Health Organization
Detection of MPXV at a glance
Poxviruses have a large linear double-stranded DNA that encodes all enzymes to replicate and assembly, but they use the host cell's ribosomes to conduct translation process in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Morphologically in MPXV, the virions are ovoid or brick-shaped that are covered by a lipoprotein outer membrane about 200 by 250 nm in size in electron micrograph examinations [26, 27]. MPXV is resistant to heat and cold as heating until 40 °C had no strong effect on its infectivity [28], while some chemical agents, such as chloroform, methanol, formaldehyde, and phenol significantly inactivate its pathogenesis [13, 28]. Host infection is mediated through the interaction of viral proteins to host glycosaminoglycans that subsequently initiate the cellular endocytosis process and virus entry. In most poxviruses infection, two types of morphologically different virions, such as intracellular mature virus and extracellular-enveloped virus spread infectious into the host [26]. MPXV transmits from animals to human and human to human. Animal to human transmission (zoonotic transmission) mainly takes place in direct contact with body fluids, touch, bite and scratch of infected live/dead animals [29, 30], just like what happened in the initiation of MPX endemic in Central and Western Africa in 1970. The second form of transmission is human to human which maybe the route responsible for raising the cases of MPXV worldwide. The main human-to-human transmission routes are close contact with a MPX positive or symptomatic person, especially in health workers, sexual partners, and household members. Furthermore, respiratory droplets, contaminated materials, mouth ulcers and lesions as well as other mucosal secretions are considered transmission routes for human-to-human spread [31,32,33,34]. MPXV is diagnosed using a set of genetic, phenotypic, immunologic, and electron microscopic methods [26]. For example, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is used to detect the MPX-specific DNA in the skin biopsy specimens [35]. Moreover, immunohistochemistry is applied to reveal the virus antigens in specific tissues and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is utilized to detect IgG and IgM antibodies against MPXV in the blood samples. In some cases, electron microscopy may be used to identify poxvirus virions in tissue specimens [36]. It should be noted that MPXV can be identified if the characteristic skin lesions are present and there is a history of exposure with suspected cases of MPXV [37]. Despite the precise detection of MPXV, the invasiveness and complications of MPXV on the second organs, such as CNS are crucial for basic scientists and clinicians. The CNS infection of MPXV not only can cause long-lasting brain injury but also can induce other neurological manifestations as we reported for SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, presenting current evidence of the neuroinvasive property of MPXV can inform us to focus on this aspect of the virus and make a better decision on clinical management. In the next outlines, we present evidence of neurological manifestations and neuroinvasive properties of MPXV.
Neurological manifestations of MPXV
The preliminary data showed a wide range of neurological manifestations from less serious and nonspecific symptoms including headache, myalgia and fatigue to more severe complications like seizure and encephalitis. The symptoms varied broadly, but the most prevalent were headache, myalgia, fatigue, photophobia, pain and fewer cases of encephalitis and seizure (Table 1). Data for psychiatric symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety, and suicide) were not included in the current study. Here are brief reviews of published reports on neurological manifestations after MPXV. For example, a severe case of MPXV, who suffered from headache, and myalgia was reported in The United States of America (USA). She was the third reported child there who exposed to an infected prairie dog before admission [38]. In addition, headache, fatigue and myalgia were frequent neurological symptoms in seven other confirmed MPXV patients in the Western hemisphere [9]. A family cluster with MPXV was also reported in the Midwestern USA that had been exposed with prairie dogs. Of three family members infected, two showed mild skin rash only and one presented with severe encephalitis which required hospitalization. The two milder forms had been previously vaccinated with smallpox vaccine. A wide range of neurological manifestations including headache, fatigue, myalgia, confusion and seizure were seen in the severe case. Neurological examination revealed decreased level of consciousness, pupillary dilatation, optic disc edema, loss of corneal reflexes and reduced deep tendon reflexes. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed hyperintensity in thalamus, brainstem and right posterior parietal cortex consistent with mixed cytotoxic and vasogenic brain edema. Pleocytosis was also detected in the analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [7]. In another study, seizure and confusion accompanied other neurological manifestations such as headache and myalgia in the USA [6]. Furthermore, a variety of neurological complications such as headache, myalgia, pain and photophobia were reported in MPXV confirmed cases in the Bayelsa State of Nigeria in a cross-sectional study [39]. Taken together all previous reports we can conclude that currently, the development of CNS and peripheral nervous system complications in MPX patients has not been well established, but there are at least scattered case reports of patients with neurological features and those with severe complications, in particular, require emergent treatments. It is thus imperative to start treatment as quickly as possible while the pathogen spread is mitigated at the population level. To this point, we highlighted available evidence of the neuroinvasive potential of MPXV from experimental data.
Neuroinvasive propensity of MPXV
The neurotropic feature of MPXV on human subjects has not been fully understood, while data from animal studies (i.e., on rodents) have revealed that MPXV can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and showed neuroinvasive capacity as summarized in Table 2. Intranasal and intraperitoneal administration of MPXV strain of 2003 is a well-established disease and caused animal death in ground squirrels after about 1 week. Necropsy findings indicated high titers of MPXV, using the number of plaque-forming units (PFU) per millimeter of homogenized tissue, in the brain tissues of animals [52]. Furthermore, during the 2003 outbreak, results of MPXV-specific PCR assay of four MPXV suspected rodents (i.e., a prairie dog, a hamster, and two gerbils) showed that the virus penetrated into the brain tissue [53]. Similar findings were reported in rope squirrel, pouched rat, dormice, and again prairie dogs in which MPXV DNA was detected in the brain tissues [10]. As can be seen from Table 2, MPXV can reach the brain parenchyma in animal models; however, considerably more work will need to be done to detect the neuroinvasive and neurotropism of MPXV in human subjects. It is also important to figure out the transmission routes of MPXV to the CNS. Currently, the exact transmission routes of MPXV are not clearly defined; however, previous studies on animal subjects have suggested two probable different routes: (i) olfactory epithelium route and (ii) infected monocytes/macrophages transmission way (Fig. 2).
Probable transmission routes for entry of MPXV into the brain tissue. MPXV can reach the brain tissue through two probable routes, such as olfactory epithelium and infected monocytes/macrophages. After intranasal inoculation, the virus rapidly is replicated in the nasal septum and mucosa and detected in the brain parenchyma. Data also showed that infected monocytes in circulation may cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and reach the brain tissue. MPXV can rapidly replicate into the macrophages and release from these cells into the brain. MPXV Monkeypox virus
For instance, the accumulation of MPXV was significantly increased in the nasal septum mucosa and brain tissue after intranasal inoculation of Congo Basin MPXV strain in ground squirrels [59]. Furthermore, intranasal inoculation of MPXV showed that the virus had more replication in the intranasal and brain areas of animals assessed by bioluminescence imaging [60]. Coupled with, the main organs for viral load were the brain, nasal septum, and nasal mucosa after intranasal inoculation of MPXV in mice. These findings represented that the nasal cavity and olfactory epithelium may act as a major route for transmission of MPXV into the brain parenchyma (Fig. 2). MPXV may gain access to the CNS by infecting circulating leukocytes, e.g., monocytes/macrophages as a second route (Fig. 2). As an example, specific antigens of MPXV-Zaire 79 were identified in circulatory monocytes of macaques after intravenous injection of the virus [62]. Additionally, subcutaneously injection of MPXV in cynomolgus monkeys strongly increased viral particles in the alveolar and mediastinal lymph node macrophages detected by electron microscopy, indicating a high replication process in these cells [63, 64]. Also, the viral particles have been obviously detected after intranasal inoculation of MPXV in activated alveolar macrophages of ground squirrels, mice, and prairie dogs as shown by electron microscopy images [16, 59, 61]. It should be mentioned that the current data suggest the possible neuroinvasive potential of MPXV; however, more broadly, research is also needed to determine the exact invasion routes.
Conclusion remarks and future perspectives
To sum up, MPXV may enter the brain parenchyma and show neuroinvasive propensity. This potential can be mediated via two suggested routes, such as olfactory epithelium and hematogenous penetration through infected monocytes/macrophages. In light of the MPXV neuroinvasiveness, it can be explained the onset of neurological manifestations and brain damage in MPX patients. A special focus on the long-term effects of MPXV on CNS using in vitro, in vivo, and postmortem analyses can be helpful to reveal the exact mechanisms of neuroinvasion and even neurotropism induced by MPXV. Finally, neurologists and physicians should be aware of the possible incidence of neurological complications caused by MPXV.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- BBB:
-
Blood–brain barrier
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- ELISA:
-
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- MPX:
-
Monkeypox
- MPXV:
-
Monkeypox virus
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PFU:
-
Plaque-forming unit
- RT-PCR:
-
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
- UK:
-
United Kingdom
- U.S.A:
-
United States of America
- ZAI-96:
-
Strain Zaire-96
References
Petersen E, Kantele A, Koopmans M, Asogun D, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Ihekweazu C et al (2019) Human monkeypox: epidemiologic and clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin N Am 33:1027–1043
Hraib M, Jouni S, Albitar MM, Alaidi S, Alshehabi Z (2022) The outbreak of monkeypox 2022: an overview. Ann Med Surg 79:104069
Petersen BW, Damon IK (2014) Orthopoxviruses: vaccinia (smallpox vaccine), variola (smallpox), monkeypox, and cowpox. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases, 8th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia
Diaz JH (2021) The disease ecology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, management, prevention, and control of increasing human infections with animal orthopoxviruses. Wild Environ Med 32:528–536
Formenty P, Muntasir MO, Damon I, Chowdhary V, Opoka ML, Monimart C et al (2010) Human monkeypox outbreak caused by novel virus belonging to Congo Basin clade, Sudan, 2005. Emerg Infect Dis 16:1539–1545
Huhn GD, Bauer AM, Yorita K, Graham MB, Sejvar J, Likos A et al (2005) Clinical characteristics of human monkeypox, and risk factors for severe disease. Clin Infect Dis 41:1742–1751
Sejvar JJ, Chowdary Y, Schomogyi M, Stevens J, Patel J, Karem K et al (2004) Human monkeypox infection: a family cluster in the midwestern United States. J Infect Dis 190:1833–1840
Adler H, Gould S, Hine P, Snell LB, Wong W, Houlihan CF et al (2022) Clinical features and management of human monkeypox: a retrospective observational study in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis 22:1153–1162
Reed KD, Melski JW, Graham MB, Regnery RL, Sotir MJ, Wegner MV et al (2004) The detection of monkeypox in humans in the Western Hemisphere. N Engl J Med 350:342–350
Hutson CL, Lee KN, Abel J, Carroll DS, Montgomery JM, Olson VA et al (2007) Monkeypox zoonotic associations: insights from laboratory evaluation of animals associated with the multi-state US outbreak. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 76:757–768
Hutson CL, Carroll DS, Gallardo-Romero N, Weiss S, Clemmons C, Hughes CM et al (2011) Monkeypox disease transmission in an experimental setting: prairie dog animal model. PLoS ONE 6:e28295
Falendysz EA, Londoño-Navas AM, Meteyer CU, Pussini N, Lopera JG, Osorio JE et al (2014) Evaluation of monkeypox virus infection of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) using in vivo bioluminescent imaging. J Wildl Dis 50:524–536
Magnus Pv, Andersen EK, Petersen KB, Birch-Andersen A (1959) A pox-like disease in cynomolgus monkeys. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 46:156–176
Marennikova SS, Seluhina EM, Mal’ceva NN, Cimiskjan KL, Macevic GR (1972) Isolation and properties of the causal agent of a new variola-like disease (monkeypox) in man. Bull World Health Org 46:599–611
Brown K, Leggat PA (2016) Human monkeypox: current state of knowledge and implications for the future. Trop Med Infect Dis 1:8
Guarner J, Johnson BJ, Paddock CD, Shieh WJ, Goldsmith CS, Reynolds MG et al (2004) Monkeypox transmission and pathogenesis in prairie dogs. Emerg Infect Dis 10:426–431
Petersen B, Damon I (2020) Smallpox, monkeypox, and other poxvirus infections. Goldman-Cecil Medicine, 26th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia
Chen N, Li G, Liszewski MK, Atkinson JP, Jahrling PB, Feng Z et al (2005) Virulence differences between monkeypox virus isolates from West Africa and the Congo basin. Virology 340:46–63
Likos AM, Sammons SA, Olson VA, Frace AM, Li Y, Olsen-Rasmussen M et al (2005) A tale of two clades: monkeypox viruses. J Gener Virol 86:2661–2672
Ježek Z, Fenner F (1988) Human monkeypox: S. Karger Ag
Reynolds MG, Davidson WB, Curns AT, Conover CS, Huhn G, Davis JP et al (2007) Spectrum of infection and risk factors for human monkeypox, United States, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1332–1339
Charatan F (2003) US doctors investigate more than 50 possible cases of monkeypox. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 326:1350
Enserink M (2003) US monkeypox outbreak traced to Wisconsin pet dealer. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Berlin
World Health Organization (2022) Disease outbreak news; monkeypox– United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON381
World Health Organization (2022) Disease outbreak news; multi-country monkeypox outbreak in non-endemic countries: Update. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON396
Alakunle E, Moens U, Nchinda G, Okeke MI (2020) Monkeypox virus in Nigeria: infection biology, epidemiology, and evolution. Viruses 12:1257
Cho CT, Wenner HA (1973) Monkeypox virus. Bacteriol Rev 37:1–18
Rouhandeh H, Engler R, Taher M, Fouad A, Sells L (1967) Properties of monkey pox virus. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 20:363–373
Nworuh B, Iwuoha GN (2019) Factors associated with the practice of monkey pox preventive behaviours among health workers in Yenagoa LGA, Bayelsa state, Nigeria. IOSR-JNHS 8:75–85
Ihekweazu C, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Lule S, Ibrahim A (2020) Importance of epidemiological research of monkeypox: is incidence increasing? Expert Rev Anti-Infect Therapy 18:389–392
Hutin YJ, Williams RJ, Malfait P, Pebody R, Loparev VN, Ropp SL et al (2001) Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg Infect Dis 7:434–438
Learned LA, Reynolds MG, Wassa DW, Li Y, Olson VA, Karem K et al (2005) Extended interhuman transmission of monkeypox in a hospital community in the Republic of the Congo, 2003. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73:428–434
Jezek Z, Arita I, Mutombo M, Dunn C, Nakano JH, Szczeniowski M (1986) Four generations of probable person-to-person transmission of human monkeypox. Am J Epidemiol 123:1004–1012
McMullen CL, Mulembekani P, Hoff NA, Doshi RH, Mukadi P, Shongo R et al (2015) Human monkeypox transmission dynamics thirty years after smallpox eradication in the Sankuru district, democratic republic of Congo. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 93:341
Costello V, Sowash M, Gaur A, Cardis M, Pasieka H, Wortmann G et al (2022) Imported Monkeypox from International Traveler, Maryland, USA, 2021. Emerg Infect Dis 28:1002–1005
Bayer-Garner IB (2005) Monkeypox virus: histologic, immunohistochemical and electron-microscopic findings. J Cutaneous Pathol 32:28–34
McCollum AM, Damon IK (2014) Human monkeypox. Clin Infect Dis 58:260–267
Anderson MG, Frenkel LD, Homann S, Guffey J (2003) A case of severe monkeypox virus disease in an American child: emerging infections and changing professional values. Pediatric Infect Dis J 22:1093–1096
Ogoina D, Izibewule JH, Ogunleye A, Ederiane E, Anebonam U, Neni A et al (2019) The 2017 human monkeypox outbreak in Nigeria—report of outbreak experience and response in the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. PLoS ONE 14:e0214229
Ježek Z, Szczeniowski M, Paluku K, Mutombo M (1987) Human monkeypox: clinical features of 282 patients. J Infect Dis 156:293–298
Croft DR, Sotir MJ, Williams CJ, Kazmierczak JJ, Wegner MV, Rausch D et al (2007) Occupational risks during a monkeypox outbreak, Wisconsin, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1150
Reynolds MG, Yorita KL, Kuehnert MJ, Davidson WB, Huhn GD, Holman RC et al (2006) Clinical manifestations of human monkeypox influenced by route of infection. J Infect Dis 194:773–780
Yinka-Ogunleye A, Aruna O, Ogoina D, Aworabhi N, Eteng W, Badaru S et al (2018) Reemergence of human monkeypox in Nigeria, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis 24:1149
Kalthan E, Tenguere J, Ndjapou S, Koyazengbe T, Mbomba J, Marada R et al (2018) Investigation of an outbreak of monkeypox in an area occupied by armed groups, Central African Republic. Med Malad Infect 48:263–268
Ng OT, Lee V, Marimuthu K, Vasoo S, Chan G, Lin RTP et al (2019) A case of imported Monkeypox in Singapore. Lancet Infect Dis 19:1166
Yinka-Ogunleye A, Aruna O, Dalhat M, Ogoina D, McCollum A, Disu Y et al (2019) Outbreak of human monkeypox in Nigeria in 2017–18: a clinical and epidemiological report. Lancet Infect Dis 19:872–879
Ogoina D, Iroezindu M, James HI, Oladokun R, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Wakama P et al (2020) Clinical course and outcome of human monkeypox in Nigeria. Clin Infect Dis 71:e210–e214
Hughes CM, Liu L, Davidson WB, Radford KW, Wilkins K, Monroe B et al (2020) A tale of two viruses: coinfections of monkeypox and varicella zoster virus in the democratic Republic of Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg 104:604–611
Eseigbe EE, Akude C, Osagie IA, Eseigbe P (2021) Human monkey pox virus infection in Plateau State, North Central Nigeria: a report of two cases. West Afr J Med 38:1242–1246
Charniga K, Masters NB, Slayton RB, Gosdin L, Minhaj FS, Philpott D et al (2022) Estimating the incubation period of monkeypox virus during the 2022 multi-national outbreak. medRxiv. 2022:2022.06.23
Pittman PR, Martin JW, Kingebeni PM, Tamfum J-JM, Wan Q, Reynolds MG et al (2022) Clinical characterization of human monkeypox infections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. medRxiv. 2022:2022.05.26.22273379
Tesh RB, Watts DM, Sbrana E, Siirin M, Popov VL, Xiao SY (2004) Experimental infection of ground squirrels (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus) with monkeypox virus. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1563–1567
Kulesh DA, Loveless BM, Norwood D, Garrison J, Whitehouse CA, Hartmann C et al (2004) Monkeypox virus detection in rodents using real-time 3’-minor groove binder TaqMan assays on the Roche LightCycler. Lab Investig 84:1200–1208
Xiao SY, Sbrana E, Watts DM, Siirin M, da Rosa AP, Tesh RB (2005) Experimental infection of prairie dogs with monkeypox virus. Emerg Infect Dis 11:539–545
Falendysz EA, Lopera JG, Lorenzsonn F, Salzer JS, Hutson CL, Doty J et al (2015) Further assessment of monkeypox virus infection in gambian pouched rats (Cricetomys gambianus) using in vivo bioluminescent imaging. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0004130
Falendysz EA, Lopera JG, Doty JB, Nakazawa Y, Crill C, Lorenzsonn F et al (2017) Characterization of Monkeypox virus infection in African rope squirrels (Funisciurus sp.). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11:809
Hutson CL, Gallardo-Romero N, Carroll DS, Salzer JS, Ayers JD, Doty JB et al (2019) Analgesia during monkeypox virus experimental challenge studies in prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci JAALAS 58:485–500
Earl PL, Americo JL, Moss B (2012) Lethal monkeypox virus infection of CAST/EiJ mice is associated with a deficient gamma interferon response. J Virol 86:9105–9112
Sergeev AA, Kabanov AS, Bulychev LE, Sergeev AA, Pyankov OV, Bodnev SA et al (2017) Using the ground squirrel (Marmota bobak) as an animal model to assess monkeypox drug efficacy. Transbound Emerg Dis 64:226–236
Earl PL, Americo JL, Cotter CA, Moss B (2015) Comparative live bioluminescence imaging of monkeypox virus dissemination in a wild-derived inbred mouse (Musmusculus castaneus) and outbred African dormouse (Graphiurus kelleni). Virology 475:150–158
Sergeev AA, Kabanov AS, Bulychev LE, Sergeev AA, Pyankov OV, Bodnev SA et al (2016) The possibility of using the ICR mouse as an animal model to assess antimonkeypox drug efficacy. Transbound Emerg Dis 63:e419–e430
Song H, Janosko K, Johnson RF, Qin J, Josleyn N, Jett C et al (2013) Poxvirus antigen staining of immune cells as a biomarker to predict disease outcome in monkeypox and cowpox virus infection in non-human primates. PLoS ONE 8:e60533
Nagata N, Saijo M, Kataoka M, Ami Y, Suzaki Y, Sato Y et al (2014) Pathogenesis of fulminant monkeypox with bacterial sepsis after experimental infection with West African monkeypox virus in a cynomolgus monkey. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7:4359
Zaucha GM, Jahrling PB, Geisbert TW, Swearengen JR, Hensley L (2001) The pathology of experimental aerosolized monkeypox virus infection in Cynomolgus Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Lab Invest 81:1581–1600
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS designed the study, performed the literature review, drafted the manuscript and drew and prepared the figures. SSN performed the literature review, supervised the work, corrected grammatical errors, and drafted the manuscript. RAA scientifically edited the chapter of neurological manifestations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sepehrinezhad, A., Ashayeri Ahmadabad, R. & Sahab-Negah, S. Monkeypox virus from neurological complications to neuroinvasive properties: current status and future perspectives. J Neurol 270, 101–108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11339-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11339-w
Keywords
- Monkeypox virus
- Neuroinvasion
- Neurological complications
- Orthopoxvirus