Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carotid web: the challenging diagnosis of an under-recognized entity

  • Short Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Determining the cause of acute ischemic stroke is crucial for patient management, particularly for preventing future stroke. In recent years, carotid web (CW), a non-atherosclerotic disorder of the carotid wall, has been found to be an underestimated source of cerebral emboli.

Objective

The present study aimed to analyze the clinical, radiological, and pathological findings, along with the treatments performed in patients with CW and ipsilateral ischemic events.

Methods

Patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and ipsilateral CW were prospectively included from January 2019 to December 2021.

Results

Nine patients were enrolled. The median age was 55 (43–62) years, with a female-to-male ratio of 3.5:1. Of the total, seven patients (78%) consulted for recurrent ipsilateral ischemic events. Despite medical treatment, 44% of the patients experienced new episodes. Computed tomographic angiography was suggestive of CW in all cases in which it was performed. The interval between the first ischemic event and diagnosis of CW was of 13 (6–68) months. After ruling out any other possible etiology, every patient underwent carotid revascularization, one underwent stenting and eight underwent carotidectomy. No severe or long-term complications were noted. Histological studies confirmed the diagnosis of CW. There were no recurrences after carotid revascularization during a follow-up of 24 (13–35) months.

Conclusion

Knowledge of CW and differentiating it from atheroma plaques is essential, as medical management seems to be insufficient in many cases. Revascularization, which has been shown to be safe and effective, might be the best treatment modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

Anonymized data for this study are available from the corresponding author upon request from any qualified investigator.

References

  1. Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB et al (2014) Embolic strokes of undetermined source: The case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 13:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70310-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hart RG, Catanese L, Perera KS et al (2017) Embolic stroke of undetermined source: a systematic review and clinical update. Stroke 48:867–872. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ospel JM, Singh N, Marko M et al (2020) Prevalence of ipsilateral nonstenotic carotid plaques on computed tomography angiography in embolic stroke of undetermined source. Stroke 51:1743–1749. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamtchum-Tatuene J, Wilman A, Saqqur M et al (2020) Carotid plaque with high-risk features in embolic stroke of undetermined source: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 51:311–314. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coutinho JM, Derkatch S, Potvin ARJ et al (2016) Nonstenotic carotid plaque on CT angiography in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Neurology 87:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002978

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal M, Singh N, Marko M et al (2020) Embolic stroke of undetermined source and symptomatic nonstenotic carotid disease. Stroke 51:1321–1325. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coutinho JM, Derkatch S, Potvin ARJ et al (2017) Carotid artery web and ischemic stroke: A case-control study. Neurology 88:65–69. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003464

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rainer WG, Cramer GG, Newby JP et al (1968) Fibromuscular hyperplasia of the carotid artery causing positional cerebral ischemia. Ann Surg 167:444–446. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196803000-00021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SJ, Nogueira RG, Haussen DC (2019) Current understanding and gaps in research of carotid webs in ischemic strokes: a review. JAMA Neurol 76:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Touzé E, Southerland AM, Boulanger M et al (2019) Fibromuscular dysplasia and its neurologic manifestations: a systematic review. JAMA Neurol 76:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Joux J, Boulanger M, Jeannin S et al (2016) Association between carotid bulb diaphragm and ischemic stroke in young Afro-Caribbean patients: a population-based case-control study. Stroke 47:2641–2644. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sajedi PI, Gonzalez JN, Cronin CA et al (2017) Carotid bulb webs as a cause of “cryptogenic” ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1399–1404. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SJ, Allen JW, Bouslama M et al (2019) Carotid webs in cryptogenic ischemic strokes: a matched case-control study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 28:104402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park CC, el Sayed R, Risk BB, et al (2021) Carotid webs produce greater hemodynamic disturbances than atherosclerotic disease: a DSA time-density curve study. J Neurointerv Surg Published Online First: 27 July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/NEURINTSURG-2021-017588

  15. Zhang AJ, Dhruv P, Choi P et al (2018) A systematic literature review of patients with Carotid web and acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 49:2872–2876. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi PMC, Singh D, Trivedi A et al (2015) Carotid webs and recurrent ischemic strokes in the Era of CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2134–2139. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Compagne KCJ, Van Es ACGM, Berkhemer OA et al (2018) Prevalence of carotid web in patients with acute intracranial stroke due to intracranial large vessel occlusion. Radiology 286:1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoephoerster RT, Oynes F, Nunez G et al (1993) Effects of local geometry and fluid dynamics on regional platelet deposition on artificial surfaces. Arterioscler Thromb 13:1806–1813. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.13.12.1806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M et al (2007) Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2379–2393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Madaelil TP, Grossberg JA, Nogueira RG et al (2019) Multimodality imaging in carotid web. Front Neurol 10:220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mac Grory B, Emmer BJ, Roosendaal SD et al (2020) Carotid web: an occult mechanism of embolic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 91:1283–1289. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-323938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Joux J, Chausson N, Jeannin S et al (2014) Carotid-bulb atypical fibromuscular dysplasia in young Afro-Caribbean patients with stroke. Stroke 45:3711–3713. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sajedi P, Chelala L, Nunez-Gonalez J et al (2019) Carotid webs and ischemic stroke: Experiences in a comprehensive stroke center. J Neuroradiol 46:136–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu H, Zhang X, Zhao J et al (2019) Transient ischemic attack and carotid web. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:313–318. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Guglielmi V, Compagne KCJ, Sarrami AH et al (2021) Assessment of recurrent stroke risk in patients with a carotid web. JAMA Neurol 78:826–833. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haussen DC, Grossberg JA, Koch S et al (2018) Multicenter experience with stenting for symptomatic carotid web. Interv Neurol 7:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489710

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Haussen DC, Grossberg JA, Bouslama M et al (2017) Carotid web (intimal Fibromuscular Dysplasia) has high stroke recurrence risk and is amenable to stenting. Stroke 48:3134–3137. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodríguez-Castro E, Pumar JM, Arias-Rivas S (2020) Letter by Rodríguez-Castro et al Regarding Article, “Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Symptomatic Nonstenotic Carotid Disease.” Stroke 51:e318–e319. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors of this work met ICMJE criteria for authorship and made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting, critical revising, and final approval of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Rodríguez-Castro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

None declared.

Financial and non-financial interests

None to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by our Local Ethical Committee (ID 2022/131) and the authors certify that it was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to publish

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez-Castro, E., Arias-Rivas, S., Santamaría-Cadavid, M. et al. Carotid web: the challenging diagnosis of an under-recognized entity. J Neurol 269, 5629–5637 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11210-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11210-y

Keywords

Navigation