Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proven beneficial in myasthenic crisis, but their role as maintenance therapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if maintenance therapy with low-dose IVIg improves clinical outcome and may be used as a steroid-sparing agent in myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed charts of all MG patients treated with IVIg from January 2006 to December 2019. Long-term treatment response to IVIg was assessed by improvement in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification scale as primary end point, as well as the ability to reduce the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone as secondary end-point, in a follow-up period of 36 months.

Results

109 patients were treated with IVIg. The mean follow-up time was 34.03 ± 5.5 months. Sixty-seven patients (61.4%) responded to therapy with at least one-point improvement of the MGFA scale. There was no statistical difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between IVIg responders and non-responders. The mean prednisone dose decreased significantly from 33.1 ± 14.5 mg at baseline to 7.2 ± 7.8 mg after 36 months of IVIg treatment (P < 0.0001), with the greatest effect after 6 months (33.1 ± 14.5 mg Vs. 17.9 ± 11.7 mg; P < 0.0001). In the follow-up period of 36 months, most patients (92.5%) remained clinically and pharmacologically stable under chronic IVIg treatment.

Conclusion

This retrospective study demonstrates that chronic low-dose IVIg treatment in patients with MG improves clinical outcomes and has a prolonged and significant steroid-sparing effect over a period of 3 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data presented in this report will be made available to bona fide investigators upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Berrih-Aknin S, Frenkian-Cuvelier M, Eymard B (2014) Diagnostic and clinical classification of autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Autoimmun 48–49:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilhus NE (2016) Myasthenia Gravis. N Engl J Med 375:2570–2581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ (2015) Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol 14:1023–1036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vincent A, Newsom-Davis J (1985) Acetylcholine receptor antibody as a diagnostic test for myasthenia gravis: results in 153 validated cases and 2967 diagnostic assays. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48:1246–1252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Evoli A, Tonali PA, Padua L et al (2003) Clinical correlates with anti-MuSK antibodies in generalized seronegative myasthenia gravis. Brain J Neurol 126:2304–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zisimopoulou P, Evangelakou P, Tzartos J et al (2014) A comprehensive analysis of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of anti-LRP4 in myasthenia gravis. J Autoimmun 52:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Souto EB, Lima B, Campos JR, Martins-Gomes C, Souto SB, Silva AM (2019) Myasthenia gravis: State of the art and new therapeutic strategies. J Neuroimmunol 337:577080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrugia ME, Goodfellow JA (2020) A practical approach to managing patients with myasthenia gravis-opinions and a review of the literature. Front Neurol 11:604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Engel-Nitz NM, Boscoe A, Wolbeck R, Johnson J, Silvestri NJ (2018) Burden of illness in patients with treatment refractory myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 58(1):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silvestri NJ, Wolfe GI (2014) Treatment-refractory myasthenia gravis. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 15:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beecher G, Anderson D, Siddiqi ZA (2018) Rituximab in refractory myasthenia gravis: Extended prospective study results. Muscle Nerve 58:452–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muppidi S, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M et al (2019) Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 60:14–24

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gajdos P, Chevret S (2008) Treatment of myasthenia gravis acute exacerbations with intravenous immunoglobulin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1132:271–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gajdos P, Chevret S, Toyka KV (2012) Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:Cd002277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karelis G, Balasa R, De Bleecker JL et al (2019) A phase 3 multicenter, prospective, open-label efficacy and safety study of immune globulin (human) 10% caprylate/chromatography purified in patients with myasthenia gravis exacerbations. Eur Neurol 81:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V (2007) IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 68:837–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalakas MC (2019) Immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis in the era of biologics. Nat Rev Neurol 15:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen RJ, Balthasar JP (2002) Intravenous immunoglobulin mediates an increase in anti-platelet antibody clearance via the FcRn receptor. Thromb Haemost 88:898–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Norris PAA, Kaur G, Lazarus AH (2020) New insights into IVIg mechanisms and alternatives in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Curr Opin Hematol 27:392–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Achiron A, Barak Y, Miron S, Sarova-Pinhas I (2000) Immunoglobulin treatment in refractory Myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 23:551–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alcantara M, Sarpong E, Barnett C, Katzberg H, Bril V (2020) Chronic immunoglobulin maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis. Eur J Neurol 28(2):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hellmann MA, Mosberg-Galili R, Lotan I, Steiner I (2014) Maintenance IVIg therapy in myasthenia gravis does not affect disease activity. J Neurol Sci 338:39–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hilkevich O, Drory VE, Chapman J, Korczyn AD (2001) The use of intravenous immunoglobulin as maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis. Clin Neuropharmacol 24:173–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaretzki A, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM et al (2000) Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task force of the medical scientific advisory board of the myasthenia gravis foundation of america. Neurology 55:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roda RH, Doherty L, Corse AM (2019) Stopping oral steroid-sparing agents at initiation of rituximab in myasthenia gravis. Neuromuscul Disord 29:554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilhus NE, Tzartos S, Evoli A, Palace J, Burns TM, Verschuuren J (2019) Myasthenia gravis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hughes RA, Donofrio P, Bril V et al (2008) Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 7:136–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuitwaard K, van Doorn PA (2009) Newer therapeutic options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Drugs 69:987–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dolezal O (2014) Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic neurological diseases: do we have maintenance dose right? Autoimmune Dis 2014:962530

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hehir MK, Hobson-Webb LD, Benatar M et al (2017) Rituximab as treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis: Multicenter blinded prospective review. Neurology 89:1069–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Howard JF Jr, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 16:976–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Adi Wilf-Yarkoni and Mark A. Hellmann contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Adi Wilf-Yarkoni and Mark A. Hellmann. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Adi Wilf-Yarkoni and Mark A. Hellmann. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adi Wilf-Yarkoni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All data gathered after approval by the Ethics Committee of Rabin Medical Center and therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board for human experiments waived informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilf-Yarkoni, A., Lotan, I., Steiner, I. et al. Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol 268, 3871–3877 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10544-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10544-3

Keywords

Navigation