Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic factor of poor outcome in anti-MAG neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological analysis of a French Cohort

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anti-MAG polyneuropathy (anti-MAG PN) is an immune-mediated peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy characterized by distal demyelination and ataxia. However, this disorder, unlike other immune-mediated neuropathies, is difficult to treat in most cases.

Method

We retrospectively collected all anti-MAG PN patients followed in two hospitals for a period of 12 years to determine prognostic factors, especially those that indicated a good response to the various therapeutic strategies used.

Results

Forty-seven patients were included in the study; of these, 61% had a classical ‘distal demyelinating pattern’, 34.2% had a ‘CIDP-like pattern’, and the others had an ‘axonal pattern’. The most commonly used treatments were intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as the first-line treatment and rituximab as the second- or third-line treatment. No prognostic factor was identified for IVIg, but electrophysiological parameters at onset were better in patients with a good response to rituximab than in non-responder patients, even though mild or high disability was observed in nearly half the patients at last examination.

Conclusion

Even though disability seems to progress in most cases despite the treatments used, our results suggest that an early electrophysiological reduction in sensory nerves could be considered a ‘red flag’ for the prompt initiation of rituximab to try to delay long-term disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Myeloma Working Group (2003) Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 121:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crow RS (1956) Peripheral neuritis in myelomatosis. Br Med J 2:802–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Victor M, Banker BQ, Adams RD (1955–1956) The neuropathy of multiple myeloma. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 99–102

  4. Garcin R, Mallarmé J, Rondot P (1958) Forme névritique de la macroglobulinémie de Waldenström. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris 74:562–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nobile-Orazio E, Casellato C, Di Troia A (2002) Neuropathies associated with IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathy. Rev Neurol (Paris) 158:979–987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Magy L, Kaboré R, Mathis S, Lebeau P, Ghorab K, Caudie C et al (2015) Heterogeneity of polyneuropathy associated with anti-MAG antibodies. J Immunol Res 2015:450391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Latov N, Sherman WH, Nemni R, Galassi G, Shyong JS, Penn AS et al (1980) Plasma-cell dyscrasia and peripheral neuropathy with a monoclonal antibody to peripheral-nerve myelin. N Engl J Med 303:618–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith IS, Kahn SN, Lacey BW, King RH, Eames RA, Whybrew DJ et al (1983) Chronic demyelinating neuropathy associated with benign IgM paraproteinaemia. Brain 106:169–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathis S, Magy L, Le Masson G, Richard L, Soulages A, Solé G et al (2018) Value of nerve biopsy in the management of peripheral neuropathies. Expert Rev Neurother 18:589–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quarles RH (2007) Myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG): past, present and beyond. J Neurochem 100:1431–1448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vallat JM, Magy L, Ciron J, Corcia P, Le Masson G, Mathis S (2016) Therapeutic options and management of polyneuropathy associated with anti-MAG antibodies. Expert Rev Neurother 16:1111–1119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Falzone YM, Campagnolo M, Bianco M, Dacci P, Martinelli D, Ruiz M et al (2018) Functioning and quality of life in patients with neuropathy associated with anti-MAG antibodies. J Neurol 265:2927–2933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caudie C, Kaygisiz F, Jaquet P, Petiot P, Gonnaud PM, Antoine JC et al (2006) Les autoanticorps IgM anti-MAG par Elisa Buhlmann: apport diagnostique dans 117 neuropathies périphériques auto-immunes associées à une IgM monoclonale à activité anti-SGPG/SGLPG. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 64:353–359

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, Warlow C (1991) The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54:1044–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cocito D, Isoardo G, Ciaramitaro P, Migliaretti G, Pipieri A, Barbero P et al (2001) Terminal latency index in polyneuropathy with IgM paraproteinemia and anti-MAG antibody. Muscle Nerve 24:1278–1282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Delmont E, Jeandel PY, Hubert AM, Marcq L, Boucraut J, Desnuelle C (2010) Successful treatment with rituximab of one patient with CANOMAD neuropathy. J Neurol 257:655–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Joint Task Force of the EFNS and the PNS (2010) European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of paraproteinemic demyelinating neuropathies. Report of a Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society—first revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst 15:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Joint Task Force of the EFNS and the PNS (2010) European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society—first revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst 15:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nobile-Orazio E, Meucci N, Baldini L, Di Troia A, Scarlato G (2000) Long-term prognosis of neuropathy associated with anti-MAG IgM M-proteins and its relationship to immune therapies. Brain 123:710–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellie E, Vital A, Steck A, Boiron JM, Vital C, Julien J (1996) Neuropathy associated with “benign” anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein IgM gammopathy: clinical, immunological, neurophysiological pathological findings and response to treatment in 33 cases. J Neurol 243:34–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Svahn J, Petiot P, Antoine JC, Vial C, Delmont E, Viala K et al (2018) Anti-MAG antibodies in 202 patients: clinicopathological and therapeutic features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 89:499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chassande B, Léger JM, Younes-Chennoufi AB, Bengoufa D, Maisonobe T, Bouche P et al (1998) Peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy: correlations between M-protein antibody activity and clinical/electrophysiological features in 40 cases. Muscle Nerve 21:55–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeung KB, Thomas PK, King RH, Waddy H, Will RG, Hughes RA et al (1991) The clinical spectrum of peripheral neuropathies associated with benign monoclonal IgM, IgG and IgA paraproteinaemia. Comparative clinical, immunological and nerve biopsy findings. J Neurol 238:383–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nobile-Orazio E, Manfredini E, Carpo M, Meucci N, Monaco S, Ferrari S et al (1994) Frequency and clinical correlates of anti-neural IgM antibodies in neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy. Ann Neurol 36:416–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Launay M, Delmont E, Benaim C, Sacconi S, Butori C, Desnuelle C (2009) Les polyneuropathies avec IgM monoclonale anti-MAG: étude descriptive clinique, biologique, électrophysiologique et anatomopathologique d’une cohorte de 13 patients. Rev Neurol (Paris) 165:1071–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajabally YA, Delmont E, Hiew FL, Aube-Nathier AC, Grapperon AM, Cassereau J et al (2018) Prevalence, correlates and impact of pain and cramps in anti-MAG neuropathy: a multicentre European study. Eur J Neurol 25:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boukhris S, Magy L, Khalil M, Sindou P, Vallat JM (2007) Pain as the presenting symptom of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). J Neurol Sci 254:33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Michaelides A, Hadden RDM, Sarrigiannis PG, Hadjivassiliou M, Zis P (2019) Pain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Ther. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-019-0128-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dalakas MC, Rakocevic G, Salajegheh M, Dambrosia JM, Hahn AF, Raju R et al (2009) Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy. Ann Neurol 65:286–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gazzola S, Delmont E, Franques J, Boucraut J, Salort-Campana E, Verschueren A et al (2017) Predictive factors of efficacy of rituximab in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. J Neurol Sci 377:144–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Léger JM, Viala K, Nicolas G, Créange A, Vallat JM, Pouget J et al (2013) Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Neurology 80:2217–2225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Comi G, Roveri L, Swan A, Willison H, Bojar M, Illa I et al (2002) A randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in IgM paraprotein associated demyelinating neuropathy. J Neurol 249:1370–1377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fatehi F, Delmont E, Grapperon AM, Salort-Campana E, Sevy A, Verschueren A et al (2017) Motor unit number index (MUNIX) in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol 128:1264–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Galassi G, Tondelli M, Ariatti A, Benuzzi F, Nichelli P, Valzania F (2017) Long-term disability and prognostic factors in polyneuropathy associated with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies. Int J Neurosci 127:439–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwendal Le Masson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical standards

This study was in compliance with the ethical principles of the conference of Helsinki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, MA.H., Mathis, S., Duffau, P. et al. Prognostic factor of poor outcome in anti-MAG neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological analysis of a French Cohort. J Neurol 267, 561–571 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09618-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09618-0

Keywords

Navigation