Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Acupuncture versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Propranolol is recommended as first-line treatment for preventing migraine attacks; acupuncture has not been compared with propranolol in a head-to-head trial.

Objective

To compare acupuncture with propranolol using indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Method

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture or propranolol with sham acupuncture, placebo, waiting-list control or usual care were included. We extracted information from the included trials using a standardized extraction form. The primary outcome was migraine episodes. The secondary outcomes included migraine days, migraine frequency, and adverse events.

Results

We included 19 RCTs (n = 3656) after screening 1078 articles. The analysis showed that acupuncture had a significant advantage over propranolol in reducing migraine episodes over a 4-week period (SMD − 0.74, 95% CI − 1.04 to − 0.44). Acupuncture also had a significant advantage over waiting-list control in decreasing migraine frequency (SMD − 1.57, 95% CI − 2.08 to − 1.06). Acupuncture caused fewer adverse events than propranolol (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.11–5.94).

Conclusions

Acupuncture had a better effect than propranolol in reducing migraine episodes in indirect comparison. The result should be confirmed in subsequent head-to-head studies.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018108585

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manack AN, Buse DC, Lipton RB (2011) Chronic migraine: epidemiology and disease burden. Curr Pain Headache Rep 15:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-010-0157-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buse DC, Lipton RB (2013) Global perspectives on the burden of episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 33:885–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413477736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vo P, Fang J, Bilitou A, Laflamme AK, Gupta S. Patients’ perspective on the burden of migraine in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. J Headache Pain 2018;19. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0907-6.

  4. Hawkins K, Wang S, Rupnow M (2010) Direct cost burden among insured US employees with migraine. Headache J Head Face Pain 48:553–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00990.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hazard E, Munakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB (2009) The burden of migraine in the United States: current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health 12:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00404.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carville S, Padhi S, Reason T, Underwood M, Guideline Development Group. Diagnosis and management of headaches in young people and adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2012;345:e5765. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rücker G, Schwarzer G (2015) Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nadelmann JW, Phil M, Stevens J, Saper JR (1986) Propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache 26:175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludin HP (1989) Flunarizine and propranolol in the treatment of migraine. Headache 29:219–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gawel MJ, Kreeft J, Nelson RF, Simard D, Arnott WS (1992) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of flunarizine to propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Can J Neurol Sci 19:340–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holroyd KA, Penzien DB, Cordingley GE (1991) Propranolol in the management of recurrent migraine: a meta-analytic review. Headache 31:333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kangasniemi P, Hedman C (1984) Metoprolol and propranolol in the prophylactic treatment of classical and common migraine. A double-blind study. Cephalalgia 4:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1984.0402091.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Fei Y, Mehring M, Vertosick EA, et al. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD001218. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3.

  14. Naderinabi B, Saberi A, Hashemi M, Haghighi M, Biazar G, Abolhasan Gharehdaghi F et al (2017) Acupuncture and botulinum toxin A injection in the treatment of chronic migraine: a randomized controlled study. Caspian J Intern Med 8:196–204. https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.8.3.196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L-P, Zhang X-Z, Guo J, Liu H-L, Zhang Y, Liu C-Z et al (2012) Efficacy of acupuncture for acute migraine attack: a multicenter single blinded, randomized controlled trial. Pain Med 13:623–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01376.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Musil F, Pokladnikova J, Pavelek Z, Wang B, Guan X, Valis M (2018) Acupuncture in migraine prophylaxis in Czech patients: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 14:1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S155119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu J, Zhang FQ, Pei J, Ji J. Acupuncture for migraine without aura: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med 2018.

  18. Zhao L, Chen J, Li Y, Sun X, Chang X, Zheng H et al (2017) The long-term effect of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 177:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Zheng H, Witt CM, Roll S, Yu SG, Yan J et al (2012) Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial. Can Med Assoc J. 184:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diener H-C, Kronfeld K, Boewing G, Lungenhausen M, Maier C, Molsberger A et al (2006) Efficacy of acupuncture for the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet Neurol 5:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70382-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, Lewith G, MacPherson H, Foster NE et al (2012) Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 172:1444–1453. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lillie EO, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ (2011) The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Per Med 8:161–173. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.11.7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C, Diener HC, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000;20:765–86. doi:10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00117.x.

  24. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1311–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rücker G (2012) Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Res Synth Methods 3:312–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JPA (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f2914. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Riley RD, Jackson D, Salanti G, Burke DL, Price M, Kirkham J et al (2017) Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples. BMJ 358:j3932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Krahn U, Binder H, König J (2013) A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao L, Liu J, Zhang F, Dong X, Peng Y, Qin W et al (2014) Effects of long-term acupuncture treatment on resting-state brain activity in migraine patients: a randomized controlled trial on active acupoints and inactive acupoints. PLoS ONE 9:e99538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Y, Xue CC, Helme R, Da Costa C, Zheng Z (2015) Acupuncture for frequent migraine: a randomized, patient/assessor blinded, controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Evidence-Based Complement Alter Med 2015:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/920353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vickers AJ, Rees RW, Zollman CE, McCarney R, Smith CM, Ellis N et al (2004) Acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care: large, pragmatic, randomised trial. BMJ 328:744. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38029.421863.EB

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Streng A, Linde K, Hoppe A, Pfaffenrath V, Hammes M, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of acupuncture compared with metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 2006;46:1492–502. doi:10.1111/j.1526–4610.2006.00598.x.

  33. Salviz M, Yuce T, Acar H, Karatas A, Acikalin RM (2016) Propranolol and venlafaxine for vestibular migraine prophylaxis: A randomized controlled trial. Laryngoscope 126:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Melchart D, Thormaehlen J, Hager S, Liao J, Linde K, Weidenhammer W (2003) Acupuncture versus placebo versus sumatriptan for early treatment of migraine attacks: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 253:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lücking CH, Oestreich W, Schmidt R, Soyka D. Flunarizine vs. propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: two double-blind comparative studies in more than 400 patients. Cephalalgia 1988;8 Suppl 8:21–6. doi:10.1177/03331024880080S805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Linde M, Fjell A, Carlsson J, Dahlöf C (2005) Role of the Needling per se in Acupuncture as Prophylaxis for Menstrually Related Migraine: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Cephalalgia 25:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00803.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Linde K, Streng A, Jürgens S, Hoppe A, Brinkhaus B, Witt C et al (2005) Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 293:2118–2125. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.17.2118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bordini CA, Arruda MA, Ciciarelli MC, Speciali JG (1997) Propranolol vs flunarizine vs flunarizine plus propranolol in migraine without aura prophylaxis. A double-blind trial Arq Neuropsiquiatr 55:536–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ashtari F, Shaygannejad V, Akbari M (2008) A double-blind, randomized trial of low-dose topiramate vs propranolol in migraine prophylaxis. Acta Neurol Scand 118:301–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01087.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Allais G, De Lorenzo C, Quirico PE, Airola G, Tolardo G, Mana O et al (2002) Acupuncture in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a comparison with flunarizine. Headache 42:855–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Alecrim-Andrade J, Maciel-Júnior JA, Carnè X, Severino Vasconcelos GM, Correa-Filho HR (2008) Acupuncture in migraine prevention: a randomized sham controlled study with 6-months posttreatment follow-up. Clin J Pain 24:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181590d66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alecrim-Andrade J, Maciel-Júnior J, Cladellas X, Correa-Filho H, Machado H (2006) Acupuncture in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Cephalalgia 26:520–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01062.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ialongo C (2016) Understanding the effect size and its measures. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 26:150–163. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meissner K, Fässler M, Rücker G, Kleijnen J, Hróbjartsson A, Schneider A et al (2013) Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med 173:1941–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang C, Liu B, Liu Y, He L, Li H, Liu J (2018) Analysis on the concepts related to adverse events and adverse reactions of acupuncture. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu 38:87–90. https://doi.org/10.13703/j.0255-2930.2018.01.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lin J-G, Chen W-L (2008) Acupuncture analgesia: a review of its mechanisms of actions. Am J Chin Med 36:635–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X08006107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng Y-Q, Wei W (2005) Total glucosides of paeony suppresses adjuvant arthritis in rats and intervenes cytokine-signaling between different types of synoviocytes. Int Immunopharmacol 5:1560–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2005.03.010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wickramasekera I (1980) A conditioned response model of the placebo effect predictions from the model. Biofeedback Self Regul 5:5–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The systematic review was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81774321 and no. 81473777) granted to Min Chen and Hui Zheng, respectively, and it was also supported by Innovation Team Project from Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (no. CXTD1701) granted to Hui Zheng.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yao-Yao Chen and Juan Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Acupuncture and Tuina, The Third Teaching Hospital/Institute of Acupuncture and Homeostasis Regulation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 61000, China

    Yao-Yao Chen, Ling Yue, Tian-Wei She & Hui Zheng

  2. College of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

    Juan Li

  3. Teaching Hospital/Clinical Medicine Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

    Min Chen

Authors
  1. Yao-Yao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ling Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tian-Wei She
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hui Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HZ conceived the study design. MC developed the search strategy and searched the electronic databases. YY Chen and Min Chen screened the retrieved RCTs. JL and LY extracted information from the included RCTs, and TWS evaluated the risk of bias. HZ performed data synthesis. YYC and JL wrote the first draft of this manuscript, and all authors revised the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare in this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YY., Li, J., Chen, M. et al. Acupuncture versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis. J Neurol 267, 14–25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09510-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09510-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation