Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in a real-life cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

No postmarketing randomised clinical trials are available about alemtuzumab, and real-world data are limited. We aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in a single-centre cohort of patients with relapsing–remitting MS.

Methods

Patients who took alemtuzumab were enrolled. We collected the following data: age, sex, MS history, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), relapses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters after alemtuzumab, and adverse events. EDSS scores before alemtuzumab and at the last follow-up were compared by Wilcoxon test. Time to first relapse was analysed after dividing the cohort on the basis of previous treatment.

Results

Ninety patients were enrolled [women 74.4%; naïve 7; mean follow-up 27 months (SD 23)]. The EDSS was reduced from a median of 2.5 (IQR 1.5–4) before alemtuzumab to 2.0 (IQR 1.5–3.5) after (p = 0.025). The time to first relapse was shorter in patients shifting from a second-line therapy (p = 0.011). Over 2 years, 43.7% had no evidence of disease activity. We observed infusion-related reactions in 95.5% patients, including 11.1% with pneumonitis, thyroiditis in 11%, and thrombocytopenia in 3.3%.

Conclusions

We confirmed the clinical and MRI efficacy of alemtuzumab in the clinical setting and the frequency of infusion-related reactions. Compared with that in clinical trials, higher number of patients developed pneumonitis during infusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J et al (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 391(10130):1622–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Montalban X, Belachew S, Wolinsky JS (2017) Ocrelizumab in primary progressive and relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376(17):1694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CAMMS223 Trial Investigators, Coles AJ, Compston DA, Selmaj KW et al. Alemtuzumab vs. interferon beta-1a in early multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1786–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen JA, Coles AJ, Arnold DL et al (2012) Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 380(9856):1819–1828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coles AJ, Twyman CL, Arnold DL et al (2012) Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 380(9856):1829–1839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Havrdova E, Arnold DL, Cohen JA et al (2017) Alemtuzumab CARE-MS I 5-year follow-up: durable efficacy in the absence of continuous MS therapy. Neurology 89(11):1107–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Coles AJ, Cohen JA, Fox EJ et al (2017) Alemtuzumab CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up: efficacy and safety findings. Neurology 89(11):1117–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Willis MD, Robertson NP (2016) Alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 16(9):84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerardi C, Bertele’ V, Rossi S et al (2018) Preapproval and postapproval evidence on drugs for multiple sclerosis. Neurology 90(21):964–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ziemssen T, Thomas K (2017) Alemtuzumab in the long-term treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an update on the clinical trial evidence and data from the real world. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 10(10):343–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Maniscalco GT, Cerillo I, Servillo G et al (2018) Early neutropenia with thrombocytopenia following alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: case report and review of literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 175:134–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman BM, Zeid NA, Alam U et al (2019) Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome associated with alemtuzumab administration. Mult Scler Relat Disord 27:131–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranganathan U, Kaunzner U, Foster S et al (2018) Immediate transient thrombocytopenia at the time of alemtuzumab infusion in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 24(4):540–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Madeley J, Hodges G, Birchley A. Development of acquired haemophilia A in a patient treated with alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018: bcr-2018

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haghikia A, Dendrou CA, Schneider R et al (2017) Severe B-cell-mediated CNS disease secondary to alemtuzumab therapy. Lancet Neurol 16(2):104–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wehrum T, Beume LA, Stich O et al (2018) Activation of disease during therapy with alemtuzumab in 3 patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 90(7):e601–e605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernard-Valnet R, Pignolet B, Biotti D et al (2018) Unexpected high multiple sclerosis activity after switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab. Mult Scler Relat Disord 25:216–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Willis M, Pearson O, Illes Z et al (2017) An observational study of alemtuzumab following fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 4(2):e320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tuohy O, Costelloe L, Hill-Cawthorne G et al (2015) Alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis: long-term safety and efficacy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(2):208–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prosperini L, Annovazzi P, Boffa L et al (2018) No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) and disability improvement after alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: a 36-month real-world study. J Neurol 265(12):2851–2860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huhn K, Bayas A, Doerck S et al (2018) Alemtuzumab as rescue therapy in a cohort of 50 relapsing-remitting MS patients with breakthrough disease on fingolimod: a multi-center observational study. J Neurol 265(7):1521–1527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parks NE, Flanagan EP, Lucchinetti CF et al (2017) NEDA treatment target? No evident disease activity as an actionable outcome in practice. J Neurol Sci 383:31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clerico M, De Mercanti S, Artusi CA et al (2017) Active CMV infection in two patients with multiple sclerosis treated with alemtuzumab. Mult Scler 23(6):874–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatcher SE, Waubant E, Nourbakhsh B et al (2016) Rebound syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis after cessation of fingolimod treatment. JAMA Neurol 73(7):790–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Frau J, Sormani MP, Signori A et al (2018) Clinical activity after fingolimod cessation: disease reactivation or rebound? Eur J Neurol 25(10):1270–1275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiendl H, Calabresi PA, Meuth SG (2018) Defining response profiles after alemtuzumab: rare paradoxical disease exacerbation. Neurology 90(7):309–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheikh-Taha M, Corman LC (2017) Pulmonary Nocardia beijingensis infection associated with the use of alemtuzumab in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 23(6):872–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blasco MR, Ramos A, Malo CG et al (2017) Acute pneumonitis and pericarditis related to alemtuzumab therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 264(1):168–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sardu C, Cocco E, Mereu A et al (2012) Population based study of 12 autoimmune diseases in Sardinia, Italy: prevalence and comorbidity. PLoS One 7(3):e32487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Devonshire V, Phillips R, Wass H et al (2018) Monitoring and management of autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with alemtuzumab: practical recommendations. J Neurol 265(11):2494–2505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalincik T, Brown JWL, Robertson N et al (2017) Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Lancet Neurol 16(4):271–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Frau.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests about this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frau, J., Coghe, G., Lorefice, L. et al. Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in a real-life cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 266, 1405–1411 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09272-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09272-6

Keywords

Navigation