Skip to main content
Log in

Does normal substantia nigra echogenicity make a difference in Parkinson’s disease diagnosis? A real clinical practice follow-up study

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SN+) detected by transcranial ultrasound (TUS) is useful for Parkinson’s disease (PD) diagnosis. Approximately 15% false negative results of unknown significance are reported. However, most TUS studies are transversal, and diagnosis of PD may change during follow-up.

Methods

Analysis of our prospective registry of TUS in clinical practice, selecting patients with sufficient bone window, to whom TUS was performed because of suspected PD, and a minimum of 3-year follow-up. Subjects were classified regarding SN echogenicity (SN+/SN−).

Results

172 patients (122 SN+, 50 SN−), mean age 71 years (25–90), were included. At the end of follow-up, PD diagnosis was retained by 91% SN+ vs. 54% SN− subjects (p < 0.0001), while final diagnosis of atypical parkinsonism (3%SN+ vs. 16%SN−, p:0.0059) was more frequent in SN−. Dopaminergic therapy response was associated with SN+ (88% SN+ vs. 50% SN−, p < 0.0001), as were abnormal DaTSCANs (90%SN+ vs. 56%SN−, p 0.0027). SN echogenicity had 80% sensitivity and 68% specificity for PD diagnosis, while SPECT had 91% and 73%, respectively. SN+ was the only baseline predictor of keeping PD diagnosis at the end of follow-up, with an odds ratio of 12 (95% CI 3–42) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our sample of patients with suspected PD, SN hyperechogenicity predicted PD diagnosis in the long term with a high odds ratio. Conversely, a baseline normal SN echogenicity was associated with a poorer response to PD therapy and change to a different diagnosis from PD. Normal SN appears to be a caveat for clinicians to check for atypical parkinsonism features during follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berardelli A, Wenning GK, Antonini A, Berg D, Bloem BR, Bonifati V, Brooks D, Burn DJ, Colosimo C, Fanciulli A, Ferreira J, Gasser T, Grandas F, Kanovsky P, Kostic V, Kulisevsky J, Oertel W, Poewe W, Reese JP, Relja M, Ruzicka E, Schrag A, Seppi K, Taba P, Vidailhet M (2013) EFNS/MDS-ES recommendations for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 20:16–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jankovic J, Rajput AH, Mcdermott MP, Perl DP (2000) The evolution of diagnosis in early Parkinson disease. Parkinson Study Group. Arch Neurol 57:369–372. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.57.3.369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, Obeso J, Marek K, Litvan I, Lang AE, Halliday G, Goetz CG, Gasser T, Dubois B, Chan P, Bloem BR, Adler CH, Deuschl G (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30:1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suwijn SR, van Boheemen CJ, de Haan RJ, Tissingh G, Booij J, de Bie RM (2015) The diagnostic accuracy of dopamine transporter SPECT imaging to detect nigrostriatal cell loss in patients with Parkinson’s disease or clinically uncertain parkinsonism: a systematic review. EJNMMI Res 5:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0087-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li DH, He YC, Liu J, Chen SD (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial sonography of the substantia nigra in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 6:20863. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Berg D, Godau J, Walter U (2008) Transcranial sonography in movement disorders. Lancet Neurol 7:1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70239-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walter U (2013) How to measure substantia nigra hyperechogenicity in Parkinson disease: detailed guide with video. J Ultrasound Med 32:1837–1843. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.10.1837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alonso-Cánovas A, López-Sendón JL, Buisán J, deFelipe-Mimbrera A, Guillán M, García-Barragán N, Corral I, Matute-Lozano MC, Masjuan J, Martínez-Castrillo JC, Walter U (2014) Sonography for diagnosis of Parkinson disease-from theory to practice: a study on 300 participants. J Ultrasound Med 33:2069–2074. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.12.2069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehnert S, Reuter I, Schepp K, Maaser P, Stolz E, Kaps M (2010) Transcranial sonography for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurol 10:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-10-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaenslen A, Unmuth B, Godau J, Liepelt I, Di Santo A, Schweitzer KJ, Gasser T, Machulla HJ, Reimold M, Marek K, Berg D (2008) The specificity and sensitivity of transcranial ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: a prospective blinded study. Lancet Neurol 7:417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70067-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Busse K, Heilmann R, Kleinschmidt S, Abu-Mugheisib M, Höppner J, Wunderlich C, Gemende I, Kaulitz L, Wolters A, Benecke R, Walter U (2012) Value of combined midbrain sonography, olfactory and motor function assessment in the differential diagnosis of early Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83:441–447. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-301719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahlknecht P, Stockner H, Nocker M, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Scherfler C, Sojer M, Gasperi A, Rungger G, Poewe W, Seppi K (2012) A follow-up study of substantia nigra echogenicity in healthy adults. Mov Disord 27:1196–1197. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerche S, Seppi K, Behnke S, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Godau J, Mahlknecht P, Gaenslen A, Brockmann K, Srulijes K, Huber H, Wurster I, Stockner H, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Gasperi A, Fassbender K, Poewe W, Berg D (2014) Risk factors and prodromal markers and the development of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 261:180–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7171-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouwmans AE, Vlaar AM, Mess WH, Kessels A, Weber WE (2013) Specificity and sensitivity of transcranial sonography of the substantia nigra in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: prospective cohort study in 196 patients. BMJ Open 3(4) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujita H, Suzuki K, Numao A, Watanabe Y, Uchiyama T, Miyamoto T, Miyamoto M, Hirata K (2016) Usefulness of cardiac MIBG scintigraphy, olfactory testing and substantia nigra hyperechogenicity as additional diagnostic markers for distinguishing between Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. PLoS One 11:e0165869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Turcano P, Mielke MM, Josephs KA, Bower JH, Parisi JE, Boeve BF, Savica R (2017) Clinicopathologic discrepancies in a population-based incidence study of parkinsonism in olmsted county: 1991–2010. Mov Disord 32:1439–1446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Araceli Alonso-Canovas.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

Approval of the institution Ethics Committee was obtained, as it was written informed consent from participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alonso-Canovas, A., Lopez-Sendon Moreno, J., Buisan, J. et al. Does normal substantia nigra echogenicity make a difference in Parkinson’s disease diagnosis? A real clinical practice follow-up study. J Neurol 265, 2363–2369 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9006-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9006-5

Keywords

Navigation