Low intrathecal antibody production despite high seroprevalence of Epstein–Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature
- 421 Downloads
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently have an intrathecal production of antibodies to different common viruses, which can be detected by elevated antiviral antibody indices (AIs). There is a strong and consistent association of MS and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection.
To systematically compare the frequencies of intrathecal antibody production to EBV, measles virus, rubella virus, varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) in patients with MS.
Review of the English and German literature on the frequencies of intrathecal immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody production, as defined by an elevated AI, to EBV, measles virus, rubella virus, VZV and HSV in adult and pediatric patients with MS.
In nine original studies identified, the frequencies of an intrathecal production of antibodies to Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen-1 (33/340, 9.7%), EBV viral capsid antigen (12/279, 4.3%) and antigens from EBV-infected cell lines (14/90, 15.6%) in adult patients with MS were clearly lower (p ≤ 0.03 for all pairwise comparisons) than the frequencies of an intrathecal production of antibodies to measles virus (612/922, 66.4%), rubella virus (521/922, 56.5%), VZV (470/922, 51%; data from 17 original studies) and HSV (78/291, 26.8%; data from 6 original studies). Though based on a lower number of original studies and patients, findings in children with MS were essentially similar. As in adults and children with MS the seroprevalence of EBV is higher than the seroprevalences of the other investigated viruses, the lower frequency of elevated EBV AIs became even more pronounced after correction of the frequencies of elevated antiviral AIs for the seroprevalences of the respective viruses.
Given the very high seroprevalence of EBV in MS, the frequency of intrathecally produced antibodies to EBV in patients with MS is paradoxically low compared to that of other common viruses. These findings are compatible with the recently proposed hypothesis that in individuals going on to develop MS antiviral antibody-producing cells may invade the brain predominantly at the time of and triggered by acute primary EBV infection, before anti-EBV IgG producing cells have yet occurred.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Epstein–Barr virus Measles virus Rubella virus Varicella zoster virus Herpes simplex virus Antibodies Antibody index Cerebrospinal fluid Serum Seroprevalence Children
This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/KKNMS, Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis) and the Charité Research Fund. BW and SJ are thankful to the Dietmar Hopp Stiftung, Germany, and to Merck Serono, Germany, for funding research on the role of antibodies in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis at the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
KR conceived of the study, collected and analysed data, and wrote the manuscript. SJ and BW collected and analysed data and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
KR was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/KKNMS, Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis) and has received research support from Novartis and Merck Serono as well as speaking fees or travel grants from Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, sanofi-aventis/Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Roche and Novartis. BW received grants from the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/KKNMS, Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis), Dietmar Hopp Foundation and Klaus Tschira Foundation, grants and personal fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharma and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare. SJ reports no conflicts of interest.
- 7.Balfour HH Jr, Odumade OA, Schmeling DO, Mullan BD, Ed JA, Knight JA, Vezina HE, Thomas W, Hogquist KA (2013) Behavioral, virologic, and immunologic factors associated with acquisition and severity of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection in university students. J Infect Dis 207:80–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Banwell B, Krupp L, Kennedy J, Tellier R, Tenembaum S, Ness J, Belman A, Boiko A, Bykova O, Waubant E, Mah JK, Stoian C, Kremenchutzky M, Bardini MR, Ruggieri M, Rensel M, Hahn J, Weinstock-Guttman B, Yeh EA, Farrell K, Freedman M, Iivanainen M, Sevon M, Bhan V, Dilenge ME, Stephens D, Bar-Or A (2007) Clinical features and viral serologies in children with multiple sclerosis: a multinational observational study. Lancet Neurol 6:773–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Castellazzi M, Contini C, Tamborino C, Fasolo F, Roversi G, Seraceni S, Rizzo R, Baldi E, Tola MR, Bellini T, Granieri E, Fainardi E (2014) Epstein–Barr virus-specific intrathecal oligoclonal IgG production in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is limited to a subset of patients and is composed of low-affinity antibodies. J Neuroinflammation 11:188CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Jacobi C, Lange P, Reiber H (2007) Quantitation of intrathecal antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, herpes simplex encephalitis and multiple sclerosis: discrimination between microorganism-driven and polyspecific immune response. J Neuroimmunol 187:139–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jarius S, Franciotta D, Bergamaschi R, Rauer S, Wandinger KP, Petereit HF, Maurer M, Tumani H, Vincent A, Eichhorn P, Wildemann B, Wick M, Voltz R (2008) Polyspecific, antiviral immune response distinguishes multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:1134–1136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Otto C, Hofmann J, Ruprecht K (2016) Antibody producing B lineage cells invade the central nervous system predominantly at the time of and triggered by acute Epstein–Barr virus infection: a hypothesis on the origin of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis in multiple sclerosis. Med Hypotheses 91:109–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Pebody RG, Andrews N, Brown D, Gopal R, De Melker H, Francois G, Gatcheva N, Hellenbrand W, Jokinen S, Klavs I, Kojouharova M, Kortbeek T, Kriz B, Prosenc K, Roubalova K, Teocharov P, Thierfelder W, Valle M, Van Damme P, Vranckx R (2004) The seroepidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2 in Europe. Sex Transm Infect 80:185–191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Pfuhl C, Oechtering J, Rasche L, Giess RM, Behrens JR, Wakonig K, Freitag E, Pache FC, Otto C, Hofmann J, Eberspacher B, Bellmann-Strobl J, Paul F, Ruprecht K (2015) Association of serum Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen-1 antibodies and intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis in early multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 285:156–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Rickinson AB, Kieff E (2001) Epstein–Barr virus. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds) Virology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York, pp 2575–2627Google Scholar
- 54.Sisay S, Lopez-Lozano L, Mickunas M, Quiroga-Fernandez A, Palace J, Warnes G, Alvarez-Lafuente R, Dua P, Meier UC (2017) Untreated relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients show antibody production against latent Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) antigens mainly in the periphery and innate immune IL-8 responses preferentially in the CNS. J Neuroimmunol 306:40–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 56.Thorley-Lawson DA (2005) EBV persistence and latent infection in vivo. In: Robertson ES (ed) Epstein–Barr virus. Caister Academic Press, Wymondham, pp 309–358Google Scholar
- 58.Waubant E, Mowry EM, Krupp L, Chitnis T, Yeh EA, Kuntz N, Ness J, Chabas D, Strober J, McDonald J, Belman A, Milazzo M, Gorman M, Weinstock-Guttman B, Rodriguez M, Oksenberg JR, James JA (2011) Common viruses associated with lower pediatric multiple sclerosis risk. Neurology 76:1989–1995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar