Skip to main content

Dynamics of saccade parameters in multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue

Journal of Neurology volume 259, pages 2656–2663 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Fatigue is one of the most frequent and disabling symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS). Its pathophysiology remains poorly understood and objective measures to quantify fatigue are unavailable to date. To investigate whether analysis of ocular motor movements can provide diagnostic information in MS patients with fatigue, 37 MS patients (21 female, age 44 ± 9 years) and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were prospectively recruited. Fatigue was assessed with the fatigue severity scale (FSS). Twenty-five MS patients were fatigued (defined as FSS ≥4) and 12 MS patients were not. Subjects performed a saccadic fatigue task that required execution of uniform saccades over a period of 10 min. Saccadic amplitude, latency and peak velocities during the task were analysed and selected parameters were tested in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Fatigued patients showed a significantly larger decrease of saccadic peak velocity and amplitude when compared to patients without fatigue and healthy controls. Furthermore, fatigued patients showed significantly longer latencies compared to non-fatigued patients and healthy controls. Peak velocity change over time and latencies correlated with FSS scores. The best parameter to discriminate between fatigued and non-fatigued patients was peak velocity change over time (ROC; area under the curve = 0.857). Assessment of peak velocity, amplitude and latency in a saccade fatigue task is a promising approach for quantifying fatigue in MS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Minden S, Frankel D, Hadden L et al (2006) The Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study: methods and sample characteristics. Mult Scler 12(1):24–38

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lerdal A, Celius E, Moum T (2003) Fatigue and its association with sociodemographic variables among multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 9(5):509–514

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakshi R (2003) Fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, impact and management. Mult Scler 9(3):219–227

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krupp L (2006) Editorial. Mult Scler 12(4):367–368

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patrick E, Christodoulou C, Krupp LB (2009) Longitudinal correlates of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 15(2):258–261

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith MM, Arnett Pa (2005) Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11(5):602–609

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Téllez N, Río J, Tintoré M et al (2005) Does the modified fatigue impact scale offer a more comprehensive assessment of fatigue in MS? Mult Scler 11(2):198–202

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD (1989) The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 46(10):1121–1123

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Comi G, Leocani L, Rossi P, Colombo B (2001) Physiopathology and treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 248(3):174–179

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Krupp LB, Elkins LE (2000) Fatigue and declines in cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 55(7):934–939

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Flachenecker P, Kümpfel T, Kallmann B et al (2002) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of different rating scales and correlation to clinical parameters. Mult Scler 8(6):523–526

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinges-Evers N, Brandt AU, Bock M et al (2010) Correlation of self-assessed fatigue and alertness in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 16(9):1134–1140

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrow SA, Weinstock-Guttman B, Munschauer FE, Hojnacki D, Benedict RHB (2009) Subjective fatigue is not associated with cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Mult Scler 15(8):998–1005

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey A, Channon S, Beaumont JG (2007) The relationship between subjective fatigue and cognitive fatigue in advanced multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13(1):73–80

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwid SR, Thornton CA, Pandya S et al (1999) Quantitative assessment of motor fatigue and strength in MS. Neurology 53(4):743–750

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matta M, Leigh RJ, Pugliatti M, Aiello I, Serra A (2009) Using fast eye movements to study fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 73(10):798–804

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis : 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 11:840–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cutter GR, Baier ML, Rudick RA et al (1999) Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain 122(5):871–882

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kos D, Nagels G, D’Hooghe MB, Duportail M, Kerckhofs E (2006) A rapid screening tool for fatigue impact in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 6:27

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beck AT, Steer RA (1984) Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. J Clin Psychol 40(6):1365–1367

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (2006) The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F (2002) Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. R Development Core Team RFFSC (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. 1(10): ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at: http://www.r-project.org

  25. Frohman EM, Frohman TC, Zee DS, McColl R, Galetta S (2005) The neuro-ophthalmology of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 4(2):111–121

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Downey DL, Stahl JS, Bhidayasiri R et al (2002) Saccadic and vestibular abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: sensitive clinical signs of brainstem and cerebellar involvement. Ann NY Acad Sci 956(4):438–440

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Straube A, Robinson FR, Fuchs AF (1997) Decrease in saccadic performance after many visually guided saccadic eye movements in monkeys. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(13):2810–2816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Prsa M, Dicke PW, Thier P (2010) The absence of eye muscle fatigue indicates that the nervous system compensates for non-motor disturbances of oculomotor function. J Neurosci 30(47):15834–15842

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Flachenecker P, Meissner H (2008) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis presenting as acute relapse: subjective and objective assessment. Mult scler 14(2):274–277

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bo J, Block HJ, Clark JE, Bastian AJ (2008) A cerebellar deficit in sensorimotor prediction explains movement timing variability. J Neurophysiol 100(5):2825–2832

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bares M, Lungu O, Liu T et al (2007) Impaired predictive motor timing in patients with cerebellar disorders. Exp Brain Res 180(2):355–365

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmermann P, Fimm B (2002) A test battery for attentional performance. In: Leclercq M, Zimmermann P (eds) Applied neuropsychology of attention: theory, diagnosis and rehabilitation. Psychology Press, London, pp 110–151

    Google Scholar 

  33. Möller F, Poettgen J, Broemel F et al (2011) HAGIL (Hamburg Vigil Study): a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study with modafinil for treatment of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult scler 17(8):1002–1009

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stankoff B, Waubant E, Confavreux C et al (2005) Modafinil for fatigue in MS: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Neurology 64(7):1139–1143

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rammohan KW, Rosenberg JH, Lynn DJ et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of modafinil (Provigil) for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a two centre phase 2 study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(2):179–183

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Prins JB, van der Meer JWM, Bleijenberg G (2006) Chronic fatigue syndrome. Lancet 367(9507):346–355

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Frohman TC, Frohman EM, O’Suilleabhain P et al (2003) Accuracy of clinical detection of INO in MS: corroboration with quantitative infrared oculography. Neurology 61(6):848–850

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from German Research Foundation (DFG Exc. 257).

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest from any author regarding this study.

Ethical standard

This study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Carsten Finke, Sarah Stricker, Matthias Endres, Florian Ostendorf & Christoph J. Ploner

  2. NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Luisa Maria Pech, Carina Sömmer, Jeremias Schlichting, Matthias Endres, Alexander U. Brandt & Friedemann Paul

  3. Center for Stroke Research, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Matthias Endres

  4. Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Florian Ostendorf

  5. Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Sarah Stricker & Friedemann Paul

  6. Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Friedemann Paul

  7. Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany

    Friedemann Paul

Authors
  1. Carsten Finke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luisa Maria Pech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carina Sömmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeremias Schlichting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sarah Stricker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthias Endres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Florian Ostendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christoph J. Ploner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alexander U. Brandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Friedemann Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander U. Brandt.

Additional information

C. Finke and L. M. Pech are equally contributing first authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finke, C., Pech, L.M., Sömmer, C. et al. Dynamics of saccade parameters in multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue. J Neurol 259, 2656–2663 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6565-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6565-8

Keywords

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Fatigue
  • Neuro-ophthalmology
  • Assessment of cognitive disorders
  • Diagnostic test assessment