Skip to main content

Quantitative assessment of visual behavior in disorders of consciousness

Abstract

The study of eye behavior is of paramount importance in the differential diagnosis of disorders of consciousness (DoC). In spite of this, assessment of eye movement patterns in patients with vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) only relies on clinical evaluation. In this study we aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of visual tracking behavior in response to moving stimuli in DoC patients. Nine VS patients and nine MCS patients were recruited in a Neurorehabilitation Unit for patients with chronic DoC; 11 matched healthy subjects were tested as the control group. All participants underwent a quantitative evaluation of eye-tracking pattern by means of a computerized infrared eye-tracker system; stimuli were represented by a red circle or a small color picture slowly moving on a PC monitor. The proportion of on- or off-target fixations differed significantly between MCS and VS. Most importantly, the distribution of fixations on or off the target in all VS patients was at or below the chance level, whereas in the MCS group seven out of nine patients showed a proportion of on-target fixations significantly higher than the chance level. Fixation length did not differ among the three groups significantly. The present quantitative assessment of visual behaviour in a tracking task demonstrated that MCS and VS patients differ in the proportion of on-target fixations. These results could have important clinical implications since the quantitative analysis of visual behavior might provide additional elements in the differential diagnosis of DoC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 330:1499–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Royal College of Physicians (2003) The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med 3:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F et al (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 8:68

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N et al (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58:349–353

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giacino JT, Trott CT (2004) Rehabilitative management of patients with disorders of consciousness: grand rounds. J Head Trauma Rehabil 19:254–265

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giacino JT (2004) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. Neurorehabilitation 19:293–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giacino JT, Zasler ND, Katz DI et al (1997) Development of practice guidelines for assessment and management of the vegetative and minimally conscious states. J Head Trauma Rehabil 12:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lammi MH, Smith VH, Tate RL, Taylor CM (2005) The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: a follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:746–754

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Voss HU, Uluç AM, Dyke JP et al (2006) Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 116:2005–2011

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V et al (2010) Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorragic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology 75:239–245

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Majerus S, Gill-Thwaites H, Andrews K, Laureys S (2005) Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. Prog Brain Res 150:397–413

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9:35

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobylarz EJ, Schiff ND (2004) Functional imaging of severely brain-injured patients: progress, challenges, and limitations. Arch Neurol 61:1357–1360

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laureys S, Giacino JT, Schiff ND et al (2006) How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs? Curr Opin Neurol 19:520–527

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fins JJ, Master MJ, Gerber LM, Giacino JT (2007) The minimally conscious state: a diagnosis in search of an epidemiology. Arch Neurol 64:1400–1405

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D et al (2009) Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1–4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res 177:73–88

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luauté J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L et al (2010) Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 75:246–252

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Brédart S, Laureys S (2008) Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose state: use a mirror. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:223

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C et al (2010) Visual fixation in the vegetative state: an observational case series PET study. BMC Neurol 10:35

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giacino J, Whyte J (2005) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: current knowledge and remaining questions. J Head Trauma Rehabil 20:30–50

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2004) The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:229–240

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagel M, Sprenger A, Hohagen F et al (2008) Cortical mechanisms of retinal and extraretinal smooth pursuit eye movements to different target velocities. NeuroImage 41:483–492

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020–2029

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ansell BJ, Keenan JE (1989) The western neuro sensory stimulation profile: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:104–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiel A, Horn SA, Wilson BA et al (2000) The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: a preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury. Clin Rehabil 14:408–416

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rappaport M, Dougherty AM, Kelting DL (1992) Evaluation of coma and vegetative states. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:623–638

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gill-Thwaites H (1997) The sensory modality assessment rehabilitation technique—a tool for assessment and treatment of patients with severe brain injury in a vegetative state. Brain Inj 11:723–734

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV et al (2005) Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol 58:585–593

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lombardi F, Gatta G, Sacco S et al (2007) The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Funct Neurol 22:47–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sacco S, Altobelli E, Pistarini C et al (2011) Validation of the Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 25:488–495

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force, Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J et al (2010) Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1795–1813

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leigh IL, Zee DS (1983) The neurology of eye movements. Davis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  33. Naccache L (2009) Visual consciousness: an updated neurological tour. In: Laureys S, Tononi G (eds) The neurology of consciousness. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 271–281

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Milea D, Muri RM (2004) Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurol 17:17–25

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trojano L, Moretta P, Estraneo A, Santoro L (2010) Neuropsychologic assessment and cognitive rehabilitation in a patient with locked-in syndrome and left neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:498–502

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharpe JA (2008) Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of smooth pursuit: lesion studies. Brain Cogn 68:241–254

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1994) Saccade and smooth-pursuit impairment after cerebral hemispheric lesions. Eur Neurol 34:121–134

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tollner T, Zehetleitner M, Gramann K, Muller H (2011) Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex. PLoS One 6(1):e16276

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372–422

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Andrews K, Murphy L, Munday R, Littlewood C (1996) Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ 313:13–16

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Giacino JT, Schnakers C, Rodriguez-Moreno D et al (2009) Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool’s gold? Prog Brain Res 177:33–48

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bernat JL (2010) Current controversies in states of chronic unconsciousness. Neurology 75(Suppl 1):S33–S38

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C et al (2009) The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 177:49–61

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are profoundly indebted to Tullio Furlan and all the other patients’ relatives for their participation in the project; the authors thank Annamaria Saltalamacchia from the Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Telese, Italy, for her support in collecting data.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. Trojano or A. Estraneo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trojano, L., Moretta, P., Loreto, V. et al. Quantitative assessment of visual behavior in disorders of consciousness. J Neurol 259, 1888–1895 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6435-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6435-4

Keywords

  • Visual behavior
  • Visual tracking
  • Disorders of consciousness
  • Eye-tracker