Abstract
Physicians have been increasingly relying on noninvasive imaging methods to grade carotid stenosis. The accuracy of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and CT angiography (CTA) versus intra-arterial angiography (IA) has been assessed in many studies and at least two meta-analyses. Here, we performed a systematic review of studies that compared DUS to CTA. In a PubMed review of the literature from 2000 to 2009, we found 12 studies that compared DUS and CTA-based grading of carotid stenosis. Only 4 of them included at least 20 patients and provided data to classify the diseased arteries into the following categories: mild, moderate or severe NASCET stenosis or occlusion. We extracted 431 arteries from 244 patients (range per study: 48–164). It was not possible to distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic stenoses. Nearly half arteries had severe stenosis (46% based on DUS and 43% based on CTA). The weighted kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.76–0.94), and the accuracy was 0.78. When the arteries were classified into medical and potentially surgical groups, the kappa was 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.83), and the accuracy was 0.89. Overall, 17% of the stenoses classified as medical based on DUS were reclassified as surgical based on CTA and 14% of the stenoses classified as medical based on CTA were reclassified as surgical based on DUS. The sparse available data comparing DUS and CTA suggest that the grading of a carotid stenosis as medical or potentially surgical remains uncertain in a relatively high proportion of patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116
U-King-Im JM, Young V, Gillard JH (2009) Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol 8:569–580
Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, Wartolowska K, Berry E, NHS Research Development Health Technology Assessment Carotid Stenosis Imaging Group (2006) Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 367:1503–1512
Chappell FM, Wardlaw JM, Young GR et al (2009) Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of non-invasive tests-individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiology 251:493–502
Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM et al (2002) Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:21–28
Shaalan WE, Wahlgren CM, Desai T, Piano G, Skelly C, Bassiouny HS (2008) Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg 48:104–112
De Monti M, Ghilardi G, Caverni L et al (2003) Multidetector helical angio CT oblique reconstructions orthogonal to internal carotid artery for preoperative evaluation of stenosis. A prospective study of comparison with color Doppler US, digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative data. Minerva Cardioangiol 51:373–385
Tiev KP, Sevestre MA, Reix T et al (2000) Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography. J Mal Vasc 25:325–331
Vit A, De Candia A, Piccoli G, Como G, Pelizzo F, Bazzaocchi M (2003) Color-Doppler sonography vs CT-angiography in discriminating carotid atherosclerotic plaques for surgical treatment. A prospective study. Radiol Med 106:382–390
Clevert DA, Johnson T, Jung EM et al (2007) Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography. Eur Radiol 17:2149–2159
Titi M, George C, Bhattacharya D, Rahi A, Woodhead PM, Stevenson WJ, Pillai A, Al-Khaffaf H (2007) Comparison of carotid Doppler ultrasound and computerised tomographic angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Surgeon 5:132–136
Van Prehn J, Muhs BE, Pramanik B et al (2008) Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:267–272
Belsky M, Gaitini D, Goldsher D, Hoffman A, Daitzchman M (2000) Color-coded duplex ultrasound compared to CT angiography for detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Ultrasound 12:49–60
Debernardi S, Martincich L, Lazzaro D, Comelli S, Raso AM, Regge D (2004) CT angiography in the assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease: results of more than 2 years’ experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 108:116–127
Bucek RA, Puchner S, Haumer M, Rand T, Sabeti S, Minar E, Lammer J (2006) Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria and multidetector computed tomographic angiography. J Endovasc Ther 13:182–189
Nonent M, Serfaty JM, Nighoghossian N et al (2004) Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of the CARMEDAS multicenter study. Stroke 35:682–686
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zavanone, C., Ragone, E. & Samson, Y. Concordance rates of Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography in the grading of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic literature review. J Neurol 259, 1015–1018 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6265-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6265-9