Abstract
Shared decision making is increasingly recognised as the ideal model of patient-physician communication especially in chronic diseases with partially effective treatments such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Since 2001, we studied prerequisites for patient participation in decision making as well as the effects of evidence-based patient information on decision making processes in MS. In pre-studies we found that 80% of MS patients demand autonomous roles in treatment decisions which contrasts to a poor knowledge of risks. On the other hand MS patients are not disturbed by evidence-based, balanced complex information. MS patients can understand this kind of information and are able to transfer new abilities to other situations. Major information interests were related to symptom alleviation, diagnostic procedures and prognosis. Currently, we study the effects of a 4 hour education programme on relapse management versus an information leaflet as controls in 150 RR MS patients in a randomised-controlled trial. In a second trial including 280 MS patients we study the effects of an evidence-based decision aid on immunotherapy on decisional role preference and performance in the patient physician encounter. Results at the end of 2006 will show to which extent patient education with a focus on evidence-based patient information influences participation in the decision making process. Assuming that patient education programmes will enhance self-management abilities and the sense of control over the disease with enhanced quality of life and well-being, further modules covering all aspects of MS are to be developed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson RM, Funnell MM (2005) Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Pat Ed Counsel 57:53–57
Bekker H, Lilleyman J, Thornton JG et al. (1999) Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 3:1–158
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692
Clerico M, Barbero P, Contessa G, Durelli L (2007) Is it possible to stop treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and to improve treatment compliance? J Neurol Sci (in press)
Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D (1999) Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 318:318–322
Filippini G, Munari L, Incorvaia B, Ebers GC, Polman C, D'Amico R, Rice GP (2003) Interferons in multiple sclerosis. a systematic review. Lancet 61:45–52
Heesen C, Kolbeck J, Gold SM, Schulz H, Schulz KH (2003) Delivering the diagnosis of MS – results of a survey among patients and neurologists. Acta Neurol Scand 107:363–368
Kasper J, Köpke S, Mühlhauser I, Heesen C (2006) Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis – a phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses. Patient Educ Couns 62:56–63
Köpke S, Heesen C, Kasper J, Mühlhauser I (2004) Steroid treatment for relapses in multiple sclerosis – the evidence urges shared decision making. Acta Neurol Scand 110:1–5
Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB (2005) How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Exp 7:317–326
National Institute for Clinical Exellence (2003) Multiple sclerosis. Management of multiple sclerosis in primary and secondary care. Clinical Guideline 8. 2003, November 8, available at the NICE Website: www.nice.org.uk
O'Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V et al. (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 319:731–734
Rothwell PM, McDowell D, Wong CK, Dorman PJ (1997) Doctors and patients don’t agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 314:1580–1583
Steckelberg A, Berger B, Kopke S, Heesen C, Muhlhauser I (2005) Criteria for evidence-based patient information. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 99:343–351
United Kingdom Medical Research Council Health Services and Public Health Research Board (2000) A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-mrc_cpr.pdf.24-05-2005
Vickrey BG, Shatin D, Wolf SM et al. (2000) Management of multiple sclerosis across managed care and fee-forservice systems. Neurology 55:1341–1349
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0901-z.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Richter, T. et al. Shared decision making and selfmanagement in multiple sclerosis – a consequence of evidence. J Neurol 254 (Suppl 2), II116–II121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-007-2028-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-007-2028-z