Journal of Neurology

, Volume 254, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Psychosocial interventions in people with multiple sclerosis

A review
  • K.S. Malcomson
  • L. DunwoodyEmail author
  • A.S. Lowe-Strong



Upon diagnosis individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) must cope with both day to day and disease-related stressors in addition to unpredictable, fluctuating and confusing symptoms. Furthermore, disease progression may interfere with employment, family life, relationships and social activities. Psychosocial interventions aim to help individuals manage these psychological, social and emotional challenges. However, there are no specific guidelines available regarding the most effective intervention content, format or delivery. Therefore, a review of the research that has utilised these interventions, specifically those which, by definition, aimed to improve quality of life (QoL) and/or well-being in people with MS, was considered essential in order to identify which aspects of these interventions may help alleviate the psychosocial challenges associated with MS.


To identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, cohort, case control and case series studies that have investigated psychosocial interventions in people with MS which aimed to improve QoL and/or well-being, to establish the methodological quality of such studies, and to determine the effectiveness of the interventions.

Search strategy

Searches were carried out using computerised databases with predefined search terms; this was supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of all retrieved articles. Relevant journals were also hand searched.

Selection criteria

Studies written in English and published before January 2006, investigating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on QoL and/or well-being in people with MS, were eligible for inclusion.

Data collection and analysis

Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers using the Downs and Black quality scoring checklist. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of studies were extracted using a data extraction sheet.

Main results

Thirty-three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria; however, interventions varied widely in content, delivery and duration. Furthermore, failure to report full methodological details, as well as weaknesses in study design, reduced the strength of inferences that could be drawn from these studies. These notwithstanding, there were three studies of sufficient quality to provide some evidence regarding the value of education/information, goal setting, homework assignments, exercise, discussion forums and multidisciplinary team support. Thus, this review has identified the potential benefit of the aforementioned activities in the psychosocial management of this population. However, further well designed clinical trials are warranted to determine, definitively, the effectiveness, or otherwise, of these components.


Multiple sclerosis psychosocial interventions systematic review emotional well-being quality of life 


  1. 1.
    Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised controlled trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134(8):663–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonak RF, Livneh H (1995) Psychosocial adaptation to disability and its investigation among persons with multiple sclerosis. Social Sci Med 40(8):1099–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2001) Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd Edition)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haabr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG (2004) Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomised trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291(20):2457–2466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crawford JD, McIvor GP (1985) Group psychotherapy: benefits in multiple sclerosis. ArchPhys MedRehab 66(12):810–813Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crawford JD, McIvor GP (1987) Stress management for multiple sclerosis patients. PsycholReports 61(2):423–429Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Department of Health (2005) The National Service Framework for Long-term conditions. DH Long-term Conditions NSF team (ed). Crown Copyright, London, pp19–23Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Ridder, Schreurs K, Bensing J (2000) The relative benefits of being optimistic: optimism as a coping resource in multiple sclerosis and parkinson disease. Br J Health Psychol 5:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diener E and Lucas RE (2000) Subjective emotional well being in Lewis M and Haviland JM (eds) Handbook of emotions 2nd Ed, New York, Guilford, pp 325–337Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Fabio RP, Choi T, Soderberg J, Hansen CR (1997) Health related quality of life for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: influence of rehabilitation. Phy Therapy 77:1704–1716Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dix O, Glickman M (1997) Executive summary: Occasional paper 13. Working party on psychosocial care ISSN 1351–9941, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for both the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epedimiol Commun Health 52:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egner A, Phillips VL, Vora R, Wiggers E (2003) Depression fatigue and health related quality of life among people with advanced multiple sclerosis results from an exploratory telerehabilitation study. Neurorehabilitation 18:125–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eklund VA, MacDonald ML (1991) Descriptions of persons with multiple sclerosis, with an emphasis on what is needed from psychologists. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice 22(4):277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evers KJ, Karnilowicz W (1996) Patient attitude as a function of disease state in multiple sclerosis. Social Sci Med 43(8):1245–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foley FW, Bedell JR, LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC (1987) Efficacy of stress inoculation training in coping with multiple sclerosis. J Counsel Clin Psychol 55(6):919–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freeman J, Allison R (2004) Group exercise classes in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Physiother Res Int 9(2):104–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ (1999) Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 52:50–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenstein JI (2002) Problems in clinical trial design in multiple sclerosis. Int Jf MS Care 4(3):3–7Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammer A, Nilsagard Y, Forsberg A, Pepa H, Skargren E, Oberg B (2005) Evaluation of therapeutic riding (Sweden)/hippotherapy (United States). A single-subject experimental design replicated in eleven patients with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Theory Practice 21(1):51–77Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herbert RD, Bo K (2005) Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews. BMJ 331:507–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hernandez-Reif M, Field T, Field T, Theakston H (1998) Multiple Sclerosis patients benefit from massage therapy. J Bodywork Mov Ther 2(3):168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Husted C, Pham L, Hekking A, Niederman R (1999) Improving quality of life for people with chronic conditions: the example of T’ai Chi and multiple sclerosis. Altern Therapies 5(5):70–74Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jean VM, Paul RH, Beatty WW (1999) Psychological and neuropsychological predictors of coping patterns by patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Psychol 5(1):21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson SK, Frederick J, Kaufman M, Mountjoy B (1999) A controlled investigation of bodywork in multiple sclerosis. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 8(3):237–243Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Larcombe NA, Wilson PH (1984) An evaluation of CBT for depression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Br J Psychiatry 145:366–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lenth RV (2001) Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Department of Statistics, University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mackay-Lyons M, Conway C, Roberts W (1988) Effects of therapeutic riding on patients with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary trial. Physiother Can 40(2):104–109Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maguire BL (1996) The effects of imagery on attitudes and moods in multiple sclerosis. Alternative Therapies 2(5):75–79Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathiowetz VG, Finlayson ML, Matuska KM, Chen HY, Luo P (2005) Randomised controlled trial of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11:592–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mathiowetz V, Matuska K, Murphy M (2001) Efficacy of an energy conservation course in multiple sclerosis. Arc Phys Med Rehab 82:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Messmer Uccelli M, Mancuso Mohr L, Battaglia MA, Zagami P, Mohr DC (2004) Peer support groups in multiple sclerosis: current effectiveness and future directions. Mult Scler 10:80–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mills N, Allen J, Carey-Morgan S (2000) Does Tai Chi/Qi Gong help Multiple sclerosis? A pilot study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapy 4:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moher D (1998) CONSORT an evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials. JAMA 273:408–412Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moher D, Dullberg CS, Wells GS (1994) Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomised controlled trials. JAMA 272:122–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mohr DC, Boudewyn AC, Goodkin DE, Bostrom A, Epstein L (2001) Comparative outcomes for individual cognitive behaviour, supportive expressive group psychotherapy and sertraline for the treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis. JConsult Clin Psychol 39(6):942–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mohr DC, Hart SL, Julian L, Honos-Webb L, Vella L, Tasch ET (2005) Telephone administered psychotherapy for depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:1007–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mohr DC, Cox D (2001) Multiple sclerosis, empirical literature for the clinical health psychologist. J Clin Psych 57(4):479–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mohr DC, Likosky W, Bertagnolli A, Goodkin DE, van der Wende J, Dwyer P, Dick LP (2000) Telephone administered cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis. J Counsel Clin Psychol 68(2):356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mostert S, Kesselring J (2002) Effects of a short term exercise training programme on aerobic fitness, fatigue, health perception and activity levels of subjects with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 8(2):161–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    National MS Society Consortium of MS Centres (2000) Multiple Sclerosis in 2000, a model of psychosocial support. Available at date sourced: 19/05/05Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    National Multiple Sclerosis Society (2000) Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres, Multiple Sclerosis in 2000; a model of psychosocial support (AUTHOR PLEASE GIVE DETAILS FOR OBTAINING THIS)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    NICE (2003) Multiple Sclerosis: Management of multiple sclerosis in primary and secondary care. Clinical Guideline 8Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    O’Hara L, Cadbury H, De SL, Ide L (2002) Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: a randomised control trial. Clin Rehab 16(2):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Patti F, Ciancio MR, Reggio E, Lopes R, Palermo F, Cacopardo M, Reggio A (2002). The impact of outpatient rehabilitation on quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 249(8):1027–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Petajan JH, Gappmaier E, White A, Spencer MK, Mino L, Hicks R (1996) Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 39:432–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Visschedijk MA, Pfennings LE, Polman CH, Ploeg HK (2004) Development of a cognitive behavioural group intervention programme for patients with multiple sclerosis: an exploratory study. Psychol Rep 95:735–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pozzilli C, Brunetti N, Amicosante AMV, Gasperini E, Ristori G, Palmisono L, Battaglio M (2002) Home based management of multiple sclerosis: results of randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73(3):250–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pryse-Phillips W (2001) Twenty questions about Multiple Sclerosis clinical trial methodologies. Neurol Sci 22:187–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rao SM, Huber SJ, Bornstein RA (1992) Emotional changes with multiple sclerosis and parkinson’s disease. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 60(2):369–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Saunders LD, Mustafa Soomro G, Buckingham J, Jamtvedt G, Raina P (2003) Assessing the methodological quality of nonrandomised intervention studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research 25(2):223–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schmid W, Aldridge D (2004) Active music therapy in the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients: a matched control study. J Music Therapy 3:225–240Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schwartz CE (1999) Teaching coping skills enhances quality of life more than peer support: results of a randomised trial with multiple sclerosis patients. Health Psychology 18:211–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Solari A, Flippinni G, Gasco P, Colla L, Salmaggi A, La Mantia L, Farinotti M, Mendozzi L (1999) Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 52:57–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Somerset M, Peters TJ, Sharp DJ, Campbell R (2003) Factors that contribute to quality of life outcomes prioritised by people with multiple sclerosis. Quality of life Research 12(1):21–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stuifbergen AK, Becker H, Blozis S, Timmerman G, Kullberg V (2003) A randomised clinical trial of a wellness intervention for women with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84(4):467–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sullivan CL, Wilkin JA, Rabin BM, Demorest M, Bever C (2004) Psychosocial adjustment to Multiple Sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care 6:98–105Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sutherland G, Anderson MB, Stoove MA (2001) Can aerobic exercise training affect health related quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis? J Sport Exercise Psychol 23:122–135Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tesar N, Baumhackl U, Kopp M, Gunther V (2003) Effects of psychological group therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Scand 107(6):394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Institute, University of UlsterNewtownabbeyNorthern Ireland
  2. 2.School of Health Sciences, University of UlsterNewtownabbeyNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations