Journal of Neurology

, Volume 252, Issue 7, pp 814–819 | Cite as

The impact of inpatient neurorehabilitation on psychological well–being on discharge and at 3 month follow–up

  • R. J. O’Connor
  • S. J. Cano
  • A. J. Thompson
  • E. D. Playford
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Introduction

Neurological rehabilitation aims to improve quality of life of patients with acute and chronic neurological conditions. Much of the existing research focuses on the impact of rehabilitation on physical functioning, with less emphasis on emotional wellbeing. This study assessed changes in psychological functioning in patients on discharge from rehabilitation and three months after discharge.

Methods

Patients admitted over a six–month period to a neurological rehabilitation unit were recruited prospectively to this study. Psychological functioning was measured by the self–report General Health Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. In addition, physical functioning was measured by the Barthel index and Functional Independence Measure.

Results

Psychological functioning was found to be significantly improved with rehabilitation. However, after three months, patients’ scores returned to pre–treatment values. Anxiety was consistently elevated on admission, discharge and follow–up. In contrast, physical functioning improved from admission to discharge and was maintained at follow–up assessment.

Conclusion

Rehabilitation services need to focus more on psychological functioning after discharge and identify effective strategies to maintain wellbeing.

Key words

rehabilitation outcomes mood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andresen EM, Vahle VJ, Lollar D (2001) Proxy reliability: health–related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability. Qual Life Res 10:609–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bridges KW, Goldberg DP (1986) The validation of the GHQ–28 and the use of the MMSE in neurological in–patients. Br J Psychiatry 148:548–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen J (1992) A Power Primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V (1988) The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 10:61–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalos NP, Rabins PV, Brooks BR, O’Donnell P (1983) Disease activity and emotional state in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 13:573–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dillman DA (1978) Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feinstein A, O’Connor P, Gray T, Feinstein K (1999) The effects of anxiety on psychiatric morbidity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 5:323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ (1997) The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 42:236–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ (1999) Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: do the benefits carry over into the community? Neurology 52:50–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman JA, Playford ED,Nicholas RS, Thompson AJ (1996) A neurological rehabilitation unit: audit of activity and outcome. J R Coll Physicians Lond 30:21–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freeman JA, Thompson AJ (2000) Community services in multiple sclerosis: still a matter of chance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:728–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillen R, Tennen H, McKee TE, Gernert–Dott P, Affleck G (2001) Depressive symptoms and history of depression predict rehabilitation efficiency in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1645–1649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gold SM, Schulz H, Monch A, Schulz KH, Heesen C (2003) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis does not affect reliability and validity of selfreport health measures. Mult Scler 9:404–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldberg DP, Hillier VF (1979) A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 9:139–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S (1994) A postal version of the Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil 8:233–239Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS (1986) Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics Geriatr Rehabil 1:59–74Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health–related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hobart J, Lamping D, Thompson AJ (1996) Measuring disability in neurological disease: validity of the self–report version of the Barthel index. Eur J Neurol 3:122–123Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Lamping DL (1996) Physician and patient–oriented outcomes in progressive neurological disease: which to measure? Curr Opin Neurol 9:441–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, Langdon DW, McLellan DL, Greenwood RJ, Thompson AJ (2001) Evidence– based measurement. Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 57:639–644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hopman WM, Verner J (2003) Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 34:801–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson G, Burvill PW, Anderson CS, Jamrozik K, Stewart–Wynne EG, Chakera TM (1995) Screening instruments for depression and anxiety following stroke: experience in the Perth community stroke study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 91:252–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jorger M, Beer S, Kesselring J (2001) Impact of neurorehabilitation on disability in patients with acutely and chronically disabling diseases of the nervous system measured by the Extended Barthel Index. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 15:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178–S189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loong CK, Kenneth NK, Paulin ST (1995) Post–stroke depression: outcome following rehabilitation. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 29:609–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lykouras L, Adrachta D, Kalfakis N, Oulis P, Voulgari A, Christodoulou GN, Papageorgiou C, Stefanis C (1996) GHQ–28 as an aid to detect mental disorders in neurological inpatients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 93:212–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marks L, McLellan DL, Langton–Hewer R, Ward C (2000) Medical rehabilitation for people with physical and complex disabilities. In: Royal College of Physicians, London, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nicholas R, Playford ED, Thompson AJ (2000) A retrospective analysis of outcome in severe Guillain–Barré syndrome following combined neurological and rehabilitation management. Disabil Rehabil 22:451–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabins PV, Brooks BR (1981) Emotional disturbance in multiple sclerosis patients: validity of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Psychol Med 11:425–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rabins PV, Brooks BR, O’Donnell P, Pearlson GD, Moberg P, Jubelt B, Coyle P, Dalos N, Folstein MF (1986) Structural brain correlates of emotional disorder in multiple sclerosis. Brain 109(Pt 4):585–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ronning OM, Guldvog B (1998) Outcome of subacute stroke rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 29:779–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suenkeler IH, Nowak M, Misselwitz B, Kugler C, Schreiber W, Oertel WH, Back T (2002) Timecourse of health–related quality of life as determined 3, 6 and 12 months after stroke. Relationship to neurological deficit, disability and depression. J Neurol 249:1160–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB (2002) Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:S18–S25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tow AM, Kong KH (1998) Central cord syndrome: functional outcome after rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 36:156–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM (1996) Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthel index. J Clin Epidemiol 49:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van der Putten JJ, Stevenson VL, Playford ED, Thompson AJ (2001) Factors affecting functional outcome in patients with nontraumatic spinal cord lesions after inpatient rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 15:99–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. O’Connor
    • 1
  • S. J. Cano
    • 1
  • A. J. Thompson
    • 1
  • E. D. Playford
    • 1
  1. 1.Rehabilitation Group, Institute of NeurologyNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondon WC1N 3BGUK

Personalised recommendations