Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term prognosis of ischemic stroke in young adults

Study of 272 cases

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There have been few studies of the long-term prognosis of young adults with ischemic stroke. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome in a large series of young adults with ischemic stroke admitted to a tertiary medical center over the last 27 years, and to identify possible predictors for mortality, stroke recurrence and poor functional recovery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 272 young adults (15–45 years) with a first-ever ischemic stroke admitted to the Neurology Department of University Hospital “12 de Octubre” between 1974 and 2001. Follow-up assessments were performed by review of medical records and telephone interviews.

Results

Nine patients (3 %) died as the result of their initial stroke and follow-up information about the status of 23 (8%) patients was not available. The remaining 240 patients (89%) were followed. Two hundred and ten of them (88%) were alive with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years and 30 (12%) died during follow-up. The average annual mortality rate was 1.4%, being notably higher during the first (4.9%) than in the subsequent years (0.9 %) after the initial stroke. Ninety per cent of the followed patients were independent and 53% returned to work, although adjustments were necessary for 23% of them. The annual stroke recurrence rate during the first year was 3.6% dropping to 1.7 % in subsequent years. Age over 35 years, male gender, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and large-artery atherosclerosis in the carotid territory were predictors of negative long-term outcome after the initial stroke.

Conclusions

The long-term prognosis for the ischemic stroke in the young is better than in the elderly, but the risk of mortality in young adults with ischemic stroke is much higher than in the general population of the same age. A bad prognosis is associated with an atherosclerotic risk profile, with a higher mortality and recurrent stroke rates and poorer functional recovery. The main functional limitation in the young survivors of their initial ischemic stroke occurs in work activity, since most patients are independent but almost half of them do not return to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogousslavsky J, Pierre P (1992) Ischemic stroke in patients under age 45. Neurol Clin 10:113–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shriver ME, Prockop LD (1993) The economic approach to the stroke work-up. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg 6:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hart RG, Miller VT (1983) Cerebral infarction in young adults: a practical approach. Stroke 14:110–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lidegaard O, Sol M, Andersen MVN (1986) Cerebral thromboembolism among young women and men in Denmark 1977–1982. Stroke 17:670–675

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nencini P, Inzitari D, Baruffi MC, et al. (1988) Incidence of stroke in young adults in Florence, Italy. Stroke 19:977–981

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marini C, Totaro R, De Santis F, Ciancarelli I, Baldasarre M, Carolei A (2001) Stroke in young adults in the Community-Based L’Aquila registry. Incidence and prognosis. Stroke 32:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kappelle LJ, Adams HP Jr, Heffner NL, Torner JC, Gomez F, Biller J (1994) Prognosis of young adults with ischemic stroke. A long term follow-up study assessing recurrent vascular events and functional outcome in the Iowa registry of stroke in young adults. Stroke 25:1360–1365

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marini C, Totaro R, Carolei A (1999) Long-term prognosis of cerebral ischemia in young adults. Stroke 30:2320–2325

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leys D, Bandu L, Henon H, et al. (2002) Clinical outcome in 287 consecutive young adults (15 to 45 years) with ischemic stroke. Neurology 59:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1990) Classification of cerebrovascular disease III. Stroke 21:637–741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. (1993) Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke.Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical Trial. Stroke 23:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein LB, Jones MR, Matchar DB, et al. (2001) Improving the reliability of Stroke group Classification Using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Criteria. Stroke 32:1091–1097

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rankin J (1957) Cerebrovascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II: Prognosis. Scott Med J 2:200

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hindfelt B, Nilsson O (1977) The prognosis of ischaemic stroke in young adults. Acta Neurol Scand 55:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferro JM, Crespo M (1994) Prognosis after transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke in young adults. Stroke 25:1611–1616

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leno C, Berciano J, Combarros O, et al. (1993) A prospective study of Stroke in young adults in Cantabria, Spain. Stroke 24:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rozenthul-Sorokin N, Ronen R, Tamir A, Geva H, Eldar R (1996). Stroke in the young in Israel. Stroke 27:838–841

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qureshi AI, Safdar K, Patel M, Janssen RS, Frankel MR (1995) Stroke in young black patients. Risk factors, subtypes, and prognosis. Stroke 26:1995–1998

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bogousslavsky J, Regli F (1987) Ischemic stroke in adults younger than 30 years of age: cause and prognosis. Arch Neurol 44:479–482

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall J (1982) The cause and prognosis of strokes in people under 50 years. J Neurol Sci 53:473–488

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lanzino G, Andreoli A, Di Pasquale G, et al. (1991) Etiopathogenesis and prognosis of cerebral ischaemia in young adults. A survey of 155 treated patients. Acta Neurol Scand 84:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  23. Camerlingo M, Casto L, Censori B, et al. (2000) Recurrence after first cerebral infarction in young adults. Acta Neurol Scand 102:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matias-Guiu J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Falip R, Codina J (1991) Prognosis of ischaemic stroke in young adults. Presented at the ECST collaborators meeting; September 12–15; Edinburgh, Scotland

  25. Abraham J, Shetty G, Jose CJ (1971) Strokes in the young. Stroke 2:258–267

    Google Scholar 

  26. Haerer AF, Smith RR (1970) Cerebrovascular disease of young adults in a Mississippi Teaching Hospital. Stroke 1:466–476

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wells CE, Timberger RJ (1961) Cerebral thrombosis in patients under fifty years of age. Arch Neurol 4:268–271

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grindal AB, Cohen RJ, Saul RJ, Taylor JR (1978) Cerebral infarction in young adults. Stroke 9:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  29. Snyder BD, Ramirez-Lassepas M (1980) Cerebral infarction in young adults: long-term prognosis. Stroke 11(2):149–153

    Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasen K (1984) Ischemic cerebrovascular disease in the young: two common causes in India. Stroke 15:733–735

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chancellor AM, Glasgow GL, Ockelford PA, Johns A, Smith J (1989) Etiology, prognosis and haemostatic function after cerebral infarction in young adults. Stroke 20:477–482

    Google Scholar 

  32. Instituto de Estadística. Consejería de Economía e Innovación Tecnológica. Comunidad de Madrid. Estadísticas del movimiento natural de la población de la Comunidad de Madrid 1999. III. Defunciones. 3 [3105] p 178

  33. Censo de población. INE (MINECO). Padrón Municipal de habitantes. INE (MINECO).www. comadrid.es. May, 2003

  34. Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, et al. (2000) Five-years survival after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke 31:2080–2086

    Google Scholar 

  35. Carolei A, Candelise L, Fiorelli M, Francucci BM, Motolese M, Fieschi C (1992) Long-term prognosis of transient ischemic attacks and reversible ischemic neurological deficits: a hospital-based study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2:266–272

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vauthey C, de Freitas GR, van Melle G, Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J (2000) Better outcome after stroke with higher serum cholesterol levels. Neurology 54:1944–1949

    Google Scholar 

  37. Biller J, Adams Jr HP, Bruno A (1991) Mortality in acute cerebral infarction in young adults: a ten-year experience. Angiology 42:224–230

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dewey HM, Sturm J, Donnan GA, Macdonell RAL, McNeil JJ, Thrift AG (2003) Incidence and outcome of subtypes of ischaemic stroke: initial results from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Cerebrovasc Dis 15:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bath PMW, Lees K (2000) Acute stroke. BMJ 320:920–923

    Google Scholar 

  40. Adunsky A, Hershkowitz M, Rabbi R (1992). Functional recovery in young stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:859–862

    Google Scholar 

  41. Burn J, Dennis M, Bramford J, Sandercock P, Wade D, Warlow C (1994) Longterm risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke: the Oxfordshire community stroke project. Stroke 25:333–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. F. Varona MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varona, J.F., Bermejo, F., Guerra, J.M. et al. Long-term prognosis of ischemic stroke in young adults. J Neurol 251, 1507–1514 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0583-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0583-0

Key words

Navigation